The Effect of Rebozo Technique on Perceived Support and Control in Childbirth

February 25, 2025 updated by: Ayça Demir Yıldırım, PhD, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
This study was designed as a randomized controlled, 2-group, experimental study to measure the levels of perceived birth support and control between women with and without rebozo technique.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Objective: This study was conducted to measure the perceived support during labor and the level of control over their own labor in pregnant women who underwent rebozo technique.

Method: The study was conducted in a randomized controlled experimental design between September and December 2024. The population of the study consisted of 44 primiparous pregnant women admitted to a district state hospital for delivery. The sample size was calculated and the study was conducted with 44 pregnant women (experiment: 22, control: 22). While rebozo technique was applied to the experimental group during the trauma process, routine midwifery care was applied to the control group. Introductory Information Form, Perceived Support and Control Scale in Childbirth were used to collect data in the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

44

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ümraniye
      • İstanbul, Ümraniye, Turkey
        • Uskudar university

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Volunteering to participate in the research,
  • Don't speak Turkish,
  • Being literate,
  • Having a low-risk pregnancy,
  • Primiparous pregnancy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Being out of position
  • Having a high-risk pregnancy (vaginal bleeding, no hypertension, etc.),
  • Dilatation below 4 cm and above 6 cm,
  • Initiation of labor induction,
  • Having received childbirth preparation training,
  • Absence of a birth attendant in trauma,

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental Group

After the randomization of the women placed in the clinic, they were informed about the study and their consent was obtained; then the Introductory Information Form was completed. The experimental group (n=22) received massage with rebozo technique during the active phase of labor in addition to routine care in accordance with clinical procedures. A 'Rebozo Application Calendar' was created for the experimental group. According to this calendar, 4 rebozo techniques were determined. The duration and frequency of the techniques and the cervical dilatation of the pregnant woman at the time of application were recorded. After delivery, the 'Perceived Support and Control in Childbirth Scale' was completed.

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)

In accordance with the 'Rebozo Chart' developed by the researcher, the pregnant women in the experimental group were massaged with 4 different rebozo techniques (rebozo technique in hand-knee position, rebozo technique in knee-chest position, umbilical support with rebozo, rebozo technique applied with Pilates ball) in the active phase of labor. After the application, the duration, frequency and cervical dilatation of the pregnant woman were recorded in the chart.
No Intervention: control group
After the randomization of the women placed in the clinic, they were informed about the study and their consent was obtained; then the Introductory Information Form was completed. The control group (n=22) received routine midwifery care only in accordance with clinical procedures. A 'Rebozo Implementation Schedule' was created for the participants in the experimental group. According to this schedule, rebozo techniques to be applied in the latent and active phase of labor were determined. The duration and frequency of the rebozo techniques and the cervical dilatation of the pregnant woman when the technique was applied were recorded. After delivery, the 'Perceived Support and Control in Labor Scale' was completed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perception of Control and Support in the Birth Scale
Time Frame: 4 months
The scale was developed by Elizabeth Ford, Susan Ayers and Daniel B. Wright in 2009 under the name Support and Control in Childbirth Scale (SCBS). The Turkish validation of the scale was conducted by Figen İnci, Gözde Gökçe İşbir and Fuat Tanhan in 2015. The scale consists of 33 items and three sub-dimensions: support, control and external control. The sub-dimensions are the health worker's support dimension items 1-12 and the mother's control over her own body and birth sub-dimension items 13-33. The scale is a five-point Likert-type scale as "Strongly Agree", "Agree", "Undecided", "Disagree", "Strongly Disagree". There are 10 negative statements in the scale. The scores that can be obtained from the DCOS scale range from 33 to 165 and these scores were used to determine the level of control and support perceived by women. Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale is 0.84. In this study, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was found to be 0.973.
4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ayça DEMİR YILDIRIM, PhD, Üsküdar University NP Health Campus Institute of Health Sciences Department of Midwifery

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 8, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Ü.Ü. Ebe Büşra Ata

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

A research article is planned to make the individual participant data (IPD) available to other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pregnant Women

Clinical Trials on rebozo technique

Subscribe