- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06852586
Comparison of Postoperative Sensitivity in Posterior Teeth Using Conventional and Bulkfill Composites
The purpose of this study is to compare the onset and severity of pain and postoperative sensitivity in patients after using conventional nanohybrid and bulkfill composites
Null Hypothesis:
There is no significant difference in mean postoperative sensitivity exhibited with conventional nano-hybrid versus bulkfill composites in mandibular molars with class 1 cavity.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Punjab
-
Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan, 042
- Zahra Zubir
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 1. Patients with ages range from 18- 55 years. 2. Male/ Female. 3. Mandibular molars with class 1 shallow-sized cavity with no history of pre-operative pain or sensitivity.
4. Ability to understand the use of pain and sensitivity scale. 5. Patients with adequate oral hygiene and willingness to participate in this study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- 1. Patients with deep caries of tooth associated with pain and sensitivity. 2. Patients who have consumed any type of medication before treatment. 3. Periapical pathologies (periapical abscess, sinus tract, periapical cyst, pulpal abscess.
4. Unfavorable location of the tooth, severe tooth malposition, and trismus.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Conventional Nano-hybrid composites
Coltene Brilliant NG Conventional Nanohybrid composites
|
Incremental layering technique is used for restoration
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Bulk fill composites
Coltene Fillup!
Bulk fill COMPOSITES
|
Single increment in bulk form is applied for restoration
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Avoidance of Postoperative sensitivity in posterior class 1 carious mandibular molars restored with composites
Time Frame: 24 hours and 1 week after restoring Class 1 caries
|
Numerical Rating Scale
|
24 hours and 1 week after restoring Class 1 caries
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Zahra Zubair, BDS, 28 Military Dental Centre
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Afifi SMH, Haridy MF, Farid MR. Evaluation of Post-Operative Sensitivity of Bulk Fill Resin Composite versus Nano Resin Composite: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019 Jul 26;7(14):2335-2342. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.656. eCollection 2019 Jul 30.
- Veloso SRM, Lemos CAA, de Moraes SLD, do Egito Vasconcelos BC, Pellizzer EP, de Melo Monteiro GQ. Clinical performance of bulk-fill and conventional resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Jan;23(1):221-233. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2429-7. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
- Yazici AR, Kutuk ZB, Ergin E, Karahan S, Antonson SA. Six-year clinical evaluation of bulk-fill and nanofill resin composite restorations. Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jan;26(1):417-426. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04015-2. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
- Tardem C, Albuquerque EG, Lopes LS, Marins SS, Calazans FS, Poubel LA, Barcelos R, Barceleiro MO. Clinical time and postoperative sensitivity after use of bulk-fill (syringe and capsule) vs. incremental filling composites: a randomized clinical trial. Braz Oral Res. 2019 Sep 16;33(0):e089. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0089.
- Cieplik F, Scholz KJ, Anthony JC, Tabenski I, Ettenberger S, Hiller KA, Buchalla W, Federlin M. One-year results of a novel self-adhesive bulk-fill restorative and a conventional bulk-fill composite in class II cavities-a randomized clinical split-mouth study. Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jan;26(1):449-461. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04019-y. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
- Chiodera G, Orsini G, Tosco V, Monterubbianesi R, Manauta J, Devoto W, Putignano A. Essential Lines: a simplified filling and modeling technique for direct posterior composite restorations. Int J Esthet Dent. 2021 May 10;16(2):168-184.
- Nascimento AS, Rodrigues JFB, Torres RHN, Santos KO, Fook MVL, Albuquerque MS, Lima EA, Filgueira PTD, Santos JBMD, Oliveira LJR, Braz R. Physicomechanical and thermal analysis of bulk-fill and conventional composites. Braz Oral Res. 2019 Mar 18;33:e008. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0008.
- Burke FJT, Mackenzie L. Bonding to dentine: an update on universal adhesives. Dent Update. 2021;48(8):620-31. doi: 10.12968/denu.2021.48.8.620.
- Burke FJT, Mackenzie L, Sands P, Shortall ACC. Ten tips for avoiding post-operative sensitivity with posterior composite restorations. Dent Update. 2021;48(10):823-32. DOI: 10.12968/denu.2021.48.10.823.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- COMPOSITES
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Class I Dental Caries
-
Mansoura UniversityCompletedClass I Dental CariesEgypt
-
3MCompletedDental Caries Class II | Dental Caries Class IChina
-
Melaka Manipal Medical CollegeUnknownClinical Evaluation of Bulk-fill vs Layered Composite Resin in Class I and II Posterior RestorationsDental Caries Class II | Dental Caries Class I (Disorder)Malaysia
-
Ivoclar Vivadent AGActive, not recruitingCaries, Dental | Class II Dental Restorations | Class I Dental Restorations | Insufficient Dental RestorationLiechtenstein
-
Hacettepe UniversityRecruitingCaries, Dental | Caries Class ITurkey
-
Neslihan TekçeUnknownDental Caries | Class I Dental Caries | Dental Composite
-
Hacettepe UniversityCompleted
-
Mansoura UniversityActive, not recruiting
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompletedPulpitis | Caries | Caries,Dental | Reversible Pulpitis | Caries Class I | Caries; DentinEgypt
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruiting
Clinical Trials on conventional nanohybrid composites
-
Federal University of PelotasUnknownDental Restoration Failure | Esthetics, Dental | Dental Restorations LongevityBrazil
-
King Abdullah University HospitalRecruiting
-
Foundation University IslamabadActive, not recruitingNanotechnology, Dental Materials, CompositesPakistan
-
Tanta UniversityCompletedComposite Resins | Posterior TeethEgypt
-
Suez Canal UniversityEnrolling by invitationDental Caries | Class II Dental CariesEgypt
-
Tanta UniversityCompletedClass V Restorations | Composite RestorationEgypt
-
Cairo UniversityActive, not recruitingContact Tightness in Restoring Proximal Surfaces in Posterior TeethEgypt
-
Ivoclar Vivadent AGCompletedCaries | Defective Tooth RestorationsUnited States
-
Future University in EgyptNot yet recruitingDeep Caries | Caries, Dental
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruitingEvaluation of Bioactive Giomer Material Versus Nanohybrid Resin Composite in Deep Marginal ElevationDental Caries | Deep Caries