Contact Tightness of Zirconomer Versus Nanohybrid Composite in Occlusoproximal Cavities in Molars

September 11, 2024 updated by: Alaa Fathi Abdelsalam, Cairo University

Comparison of Proximal Contact Tightness of Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ionomer Versus Conventional Nanohybrid Resin Composite: a Randomized Clinical Trial

To achieve an optimal contact area is essential to avoid tooth migration, food impaction, and the occurrence of secondary caries. However, proximal restorations constitute challenge for the professional and tight contact points are difficult to obtain depending not only on tools used, but also on type of restorative material. Current tooth-colored restorative materials are not condensable and there is shrinkage with setting. The aim of this study is to compare the proximal contact tightness of zirconia reinforced glass ionomer versus conventional nanohybrid resin composite when used in class II cavities.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

52

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Manyal
      • Cairo, Manyal, Egypt, 11555
        • Faculty of Dentistry Cairo University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Eligibility Criteria of participants:

Inclusion Criteria of participants:

  • Patients with occlusoproximal caries in molars classified as ICDAS III or IV.
  • 19-35 years.
  • Males or Females.
  • Co-operative patients approving to participate in the trial.

Exclusion criteria of participants:

  • Pregnancy.
  • Disabilities.
  • Systemic disease or severe medical complications.
  • Allergic history concerning methacrylate.
  • Rampant caries.
  • Heavy smoking.
  • Xerostomia.
  • Lack of compliance.
  • Evidence of severe bruxism, clenching, or temporomandibular joint disorders.

    b- Eligibility Criteria of teeth:

Inclusion Criteria of teeth:

  • Occlusoproximal caries in molars classified as ICDAS III or IV.
  • Vital upper or lower posterior teeth with no signs of irreversible pulpitis.
  • Intact contact with opposing teeth.
  • Teeth with no previous restorations in other surfaces.

Exclusion criteria of the teeth:

  • Extensive carious lesions
  • Periapical pathology or signs of pulpal pathology.
  • Tooth hypersensitivity.
  • Possible prosthodontic restoration of teeth.
  • Heavy occlusion and occlusal contacts or history of bruxism.
  • Sever periodontal affection.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Zirconomer in Class II cavities
Zirconia modified glass ionomer restorative material
zirconia modified glass ionomer
Active Comparator: Nanohybrid composite in Class II cavities
Conventionally used aesthetic restorations in class II
conventional composite

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Contact Tightness
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 1 year

Measuring the adequacy of proximal contact restoration using intervention ' zirconomer" versus control which is Nanohybrid resin composite.

Heaviness of this contact using Modified USPHS criteria. USPHS criteria are standardized in which a dental floss is used.

Contact tightness can have one of three scores:

Alpha Bravo Charlie

baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alaa F Abdelsalam, phD, Lecturer of conservative dentistry, Cairo University
  • Principal Investigator: Hadier M Gad, PhD, Lecturer of conservative dentistry, Cairo University
  • Principal Investigator: Manar A Elmokanen, PhD, Lecturer of conservative dentistry, Cairo University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 12, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 12, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 25, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

September 19, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2024

Last Verified

September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Contact Tightness in Restoring Proximal Surfaces in Posterior Teeth

Clinical Trials on Zirconomer

Subscribe