- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06853561
Reducing Individual Work Stress in Healthcare Professionals Through Exchange of Job Resources
Co-work Design: A Structural Approach to Reduce Individual Work Stress in Healthcare Professionals in Hospital Settings
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Below, we provide more information on the study design, study procedure, data collection, data management, and data analysis.
Study Design:
Type: Prospective, longitudinal, observational diary study. Duration: 10 workdays of daily surveys with a baseline survey at the start (Day 0).
Setting: Online survey tool (Castor), accessible via smartphones.
Study Procedure:
Day 0 - Baseline Survey: Collects demographic data and job-related information.
Days 1-10 - Daily Surveys:
Workday Verification: Confirmation of work on that day.
In addition to the outcomes listed under primary and secondary outcome measures, daily surveys will include measures of:
Prosocial Job Crafting: 12 items adapted to measure crafting behaviors to benefit other team members, using the Prosocial Job Crafting Measure (PSJCM).
Psychological Capital: 12 items measuring hope, self-efficacy, optimism, and resilience, using a shortened version of the Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ).
Day 11 - Post-Study Survey: Summary of results and feedback opportunity.
Data Collection:
Survey Platform: Mobile-friendly (Castor). Questionnaire Format: Self-report measures adapted for daily context.
Data Management:
Anonymity: Participants are assigned anonymous codes for data matching. Confidentiality: Data is securely stored with access only for researchers on the project.
Statistical Analysis:
Multilevel modeling will be used to analyze the nested nature of daily data and relationships between job crafting, resource exchange, and work outcomes.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Luisa Solms, MSc
- Phone Number: +31 619949815
- Email: solms@essb.eur.nl
Study Locations
-
-
-
Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Recruiting
- Erasmus University Rotterdam
-
Contact:
- Luisa Solms
- Phone Number: +31 619949815
- Email: solms@essb.eur.nl
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Eligibility Criteria:
- Employees (nurse professionals) working in a team-based work environment (hospital setting).
- Participants must be able to complete daily surveys in the designated timeframe (end of each workday).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Part-time workers with small contracts (less than 3 days a week) or individuals not engaged in team-based work.
- Participants who do not complete the baseline survey or a minimum of 5 daily surveys.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Burnout
Time Frame: From the start of the study (i.e., at baseline, day 0) to the end of the study (i.e., at day 10).
|
Burnout symptoms will be assessed using the ultra-short version of the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT4) consisting of 4 items.
The tool assesses perceptions of symptoms like exhaustion, mental distance, emotional impairment, and cognitive impairment based on self-reported responses.
Notably, the different symptoms (e.g., exhaustion) are combined into a composite score to give an overall burnout measure rather than being treated as separate outcomes.
|
From the start of the study (i.e., at baseline, day 0) to the end of the study (i.e., at day 10).
|
|
Work engagement
Time Frame: From start of study (i.e., at baseline, day 0) to end of study (i.e., at day 10).
|
Work engagement will be assessed using a shortened, 3-item version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES), which captures a work-related and positive state of mind, characterized by vigor, dedication, and absorption.
Items will be combined into a composite score to give an overall work engagement measure.
|
From start of study (i.e., at baseline, day 0) to end of study (i.e., at day 10).
|
|
Flourishing
Time Frame: From the start of the study (i.e., at baseline, day 0) to the end of the study (day 10).
|
Flourishing will be assessed with Diener's 8-item Flourishing Scale.
The scale captures self-perceived success in important areas of life, such as relationships, self-esteem, purpose, and optimism.
The score for flourishing is calculated by averaging the responses to these 8 items, with higher scores reflecting greater flourishing.
|
From the start of the study (i.e., at baseline, day 0) to the end of the study (day 10).
|
|
Job Resources Exchange
Time Frame: From the start of the study (i.e., at baseline, day 0) to the end of the study (day 10).
|
Frequency of job resources exchange with other team members will be assessed based on scale developed by Edelmann and colleagues (not published).
The scale assesses the extent to which individuals provide and receive feedback and knowledge to and from other members of their team.
|
From the start of the study (i.e., at baseline, day 0) to the end of the study (day 10).
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Workload
Time Frame: From the start of the study (i.e., at baseline, day 0) to end of the study (i.e., day 10).
|
Workload will be measured with five items from the Questionnaire on the Experience and Evaluation of Work (QEEW).
Responses will be combined into a composite score.
|
From the start of the study (i.e., at baseline, day 0) to end of the study (i.e., day 10).
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Anderson, N., & West, M. A. (1996). The team climate inventory: Development of the TCI and its applications in team building for innovativeness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 5366
- Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46(4), 823-847.
- Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D. W., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97, 143-156.
- Grant AM. Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. J Appl Psychol. 2008 Jan;93(1):48-58. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.48.
- Hadzibajramovic E, Schaufeli W, De Witte H. The ultra-short version of the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT4)-development, validation, and measurement invariance across countries, age and gender. PLoS One. 2024 Feb 23;19(2):e0297843. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297843. eCollection 2024.
- Luthans, F., & Youssef-Morgan, C. M. (2017). Psychological capital: An evidence-based positive approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4(1), 339-366.
- Perugini, M., Gallucci, M., Presaghi, F., & Ercolani, A. P. (2003). The personal norm of reciprocity. European Journal of Personality, 17(4), 251-283.
- Schaufeli, W. B., Shimazu, A., Hakanen, J., Salanova, M., & De Witte, H. (2017). An ultra-short measure for work engagement. European Journal of Psychological Assessment.
- Viragos, Anna (2018) Investigating job crafting from a prosocial perspective. PhD thesis, University of Leeds. https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/23965/
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- ETH2425-0324
- 14160503.001 (Other Grant/Funding Number: European Union)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Job Crafting
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentCompletedUnemployment | Job SatisfactionUnited States
-
Kamuran CeritNot yet recruitingJob Stress | Job Satisfaction | Work Performance
-
Buğu Usanma KobanCompletedJob Engagement | Leisure ActivitiesTurkey
-
Billings ClinicUniversity of Rochester; University of South-Eastern NorwayTerminatedMotivation | Wellness | Job SatisfactionUnited States
-
Virginia Commonwealth UniversityAetna, Inc.; Pet PartnersWithdrawnThe Effect of a Therapy Dog Activity on Employees' Stress, Mood, and Job Satisfaction and CommitmentStress | Mood | Job SatisfactionUnited States
-
Mayo ClinicCompletedPhysician Well-being | Physician Job SatisfactionUnited States
-
University Hospital, MontpellierUniversité Montpellier; Occupational Health Center, Montpellier, FranceCompleted
-
Lebanese UniversityCompletedBurnout | Job Satisfaction | Intention to LeaveLebanon
-
Hiroshima UniversityNot yet recruitingPatient Safety | Job Satisfaction | Surgical Outcome | Core Competency | Interprofessional CollaborationCambodia
-
University of SalamancaNot yet recruitingAgeism | Job Satisfaction | Workers