- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06856538
Rhomboid Intercostal Sub Serratus Plane Block Versus Serratus Anterior Plane Block in Thoractomy
Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Rhomboid Intercostal Sub Serratus Plane Block Versus Serratus Anterior Plane Block With General Anesthesia in Thoracotomy
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Open thoracotomy is commonly considered to be one of the most agonizing surgical operations. Pain following thoracotomy greatly impedes patient recovery and postoperative respiration. The pain experienced after a thoracotomy can originate from various factors, including the surgical incision, injury to the ribs and intercostal nerves, manipulation of the pleura and lung tissue, and the placement of a drainage tube.Recent advances in regional anesthesia techniques have aimed to provide more targeted and effective pain relief. Among these, ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks, such as the rhomboid intercostal sub-serratus plane (RISS) block and the serratus anterior plane (SAP) block, have emerged as promising options. Both blocks target the thoracic nerves, but they differ in their anatomical approach and potential analgesic effects Postoperative pain was not only related to a comfortable recovery but also related to postoperative complications including pulmonary dysfunction, so the management of postoperative pain is an important part of the care of post operation.
Regional anesthesia techniques have been shown to have a good effect on postoperative analgesia and helps patients gain early recovery after operation.
Serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) is an easy, and safe method used for blockade of the sensory plane of the lateral cutaneous branch of the intercostal nerve (T2-T9).
The Serratus anterior plane block targets the lateral cutaneous branches of the thoracic intercostal nerves, which arise from the anterior rami of the thoracic spinal nerves and run in a neurovascular bundle immediately inferior to each rib. At the midaxillary line, the lateral cutaneous branches of the thoracic intercostal nerve traverse through the internal intercostal, external intercostal, and serratus anterior muscles innervating the musculature of the lateral thorax. These branches of the intercostal nerves travel through the two potential spaces described above.
The "Rhomboid intercostal and sub serratus plane block" (RISS) is a relatively newer block technique whose efficacy was documented in patients undergoing thoracic surgeries.
The RISS plane block involves the injection of local anesthetics into fascial planes, theoretically allowing for catheter placement to achieve continuous analgesia. Successful RISS plane blocks have been reported in various procedures, including lung transplantation, radical mastectomy, and nephrectomy, strongly suggesting favorable outcomes in postoperative pain relief.
In 2016, Elsharkawy et al. introduced a RA technique known as the rhomboid intercostal block (RIB). Rhomboid intercostal block involves injecting a local anesthetic into the upper intercostal muscle plane beneath the rhomboid muscles, providing analgesia to both the anterior and posterior thorax.Based on past studies, investigators found that RISS and SAPB are effectively decrease total opioid consumption, so investigators hypothesized one of them is the best.
Statistical analysis:
Statistical analysis will be conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics 22(IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The normal distribution of data will be assessed by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests. Mean and standard deviation will be used as descriptive statistics for normally distributed numerical variables, while median and interquartile range (25th to 75th percentiles) will be used as descriptive statistics for non-normally distributed numerical variables. In addition, Chi-square test or fisher exact test will be employed to test the significance between categorical variables as appropriate. Independent t test will be employed for numerical data that exhibited normal distribution, whereas the Mann-Whitney test will be used for numerical data that did not adhere to normal distribution. A significance level of p < 0.05 will be deemed to be statistically significant.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Emad El Mohamed Abd El-Razek, M.Sc.
- Phone Number: +2 0 109 400 6418
- Email: ema18@fayoum.edu.eg
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Yasser S Mostafa, MD
- Phone Number: +2 01010509735
- Email: ysm03@fayoum.edu.eg
Study Locations
-
-
Faiyum Governorate
-
Madīnat al Fayyūm, Faiyum Governorate, Egypt, 63514
- Recruiting
- Fayoum University hospital
-
Contact:
- Mohamed A Hamed, MD.
- Phone Number: +20 010105093736
- Email: mah07@fayoum.edu.eg
-
Contact:
- Yasser S Mostafa, M.D.
- Phone Number: +20 1010509735
- Email: ysm03@fayoum.edu.eg
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged 18-70 years.
- Patients scheduled for unilateral Thoracotomy.
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III.
- Patients who are candidates for general anesthesia.
- No history of severe allergies to local anesthetics or other medications used during the procedure.
Exclusion Criteria:
- ASA PS class ≥ IV patients.
- obese (BMI ≥ 35) patients.
- Patients with uncontrolled cardiovascular.
- patients with neurological deficits, cardiopulmonary, hepatorenal , or metabolic diseases; anticoagulants; any drug allergies.
- Patients with emergency surgeries or re-do surgeries.
- Systemic infections or infections at the site of injection.
- Psychiatric illnesses (schizophrenia, bipolar, uncontrolled anxiety or depression).
- Narcotic dependency.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Group R
A high- frequency linear ultrasound transducer will be placed longitudinally (in the sagittal plane) on the patient's back, just 2 cm medial to the medial scapular border.
Then, the probe will be slightly rotated to obtain an oblique parasagittal plane.
The following landmarks will be identified: the trapezius muscle, rhomboid major muscle, intercostal muscles, pleura, and lungs (from superficial to deep in order of appearance).
The rhomboid major muscle will be distinguished at the level of the T6 and T7 vertebrae, below the trapezius muscle.
|
A linear US transducer (Phillips-Saronno Italy) was placed vertically 3 cm lateral to the midline to visualize back muscles: the trapezius above, the rhomboid major in the middle, and the erector-spinae muscle on the bottom, as well as the TPs with shimmering pleura in between.
After the location will be confirmed through hydrodissection of 1 ml on the plane between the rhomboid major and the underlying intercostal muscles after confirming a negative aspiration via a a 22-gauge short bevel sonovisible needle (Spinocan, B. Braun Melsungen AG, Germany) using an in-plane technique then 10 ml of bupivacaine (concentration 0.25%) will be injected.
and its spread will be manifested by the hydrodissection and widening of the plane visualized by ultrasound.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Group S
|
A linear US transducer (Phillips-Saronno Italy) was placed vertically 3 cm lateral to the midline to visualize back muscles: the trapezius above, the rhomboid major in the middle, and the erector-spinae muscle on the bottom, as well as the TPs with shimmering pleura in between.
After the location will be confirmed through hydrodissection of 1 ml on the plane between the rhomboid major and the underlying intercostal muscles after confirming a negative aspiration via a a 22-gauge short bevel sonovisible needle (Spinocan, B. Braun Melsungen AG, Germany) using an in-plane technique then 10 ml of bupivacaine (concentration 0.25%) will be injected.
and its spread will be manifested by the hydrodissection and widening of the plane visualized by ultrasound.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Total opioid consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively.
|
in microgram
|
24 hours postoperatively.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Total intraoperative opioid consumption
Time Frame: from begining of operation till 5 minutes after extubation
|
in microgram
|
from begining of operation till 5 minutes after extubation
|
|
Visual analog pain score at rest
Time Frame: Immediately after the procedures
|
Ranging from 0 indicating no pain to 10 indicating extreme pain
|
Immediately after the procedures
|
|
Visual analog pain score at cough
Time Frame: Immediately after the procedures
|
Ranging from 0 indicating no pain to 10 indicating extreme pain
|
Immediately after the procedures
|
|
Visual analog pain score at rest
Time Frame: 1 hour postoperatively.
|
Ranging from 0 indicating no pain to 10 indicating extreme pain
|
1 hour postoperatively.
|
|
Visual analog pain score at cough
Time Frame: 1 hour postoperatively.
|
Ranging from 0 indicating no pain to 10 indicating extreme pain
|
1 hour postoperatively.
|
|
Visual analog pain score at rest
Time Frame: 3 hours postoperatively.
|
Ranging from 0 indicating no pain to 10 indicating extreme pain
|
3 hours postoperatively.
|
|
Visual analog pain score at cough
Time Frame: 3 hours postoperatively.
|
Ranging from 0 indicating no pain to 10 indicating extreme pain
|
3 hours postoperatively.
|
|
Visual analog pain score at rest
Time Frame: 6 hours postoperatively.
|
Ranging from 0 indicating no pain to 10 indicating extreme pain
|
6 hours postoperatively.
|
|
Visual analog pain score at cough
Time Frame: 6 hours postoperatively.
|
Ranging from 0 indicating no pain to 10 indicating extreme pain
|
6 hours postoperatively.
|
|
Visual analog pain score at rest
Time Frame: 12 hours postoperatively.
|
Ranging from 0 indicating no pain to 10 indicating extreme pain
|
12 hours postoperatively.
|
|
Visual analog pain score at cough
Time Frame: 12 hours postoperatively.
|
Ranging from 0 indicating no pain to 10 indicating extreme pain
|
12 hours postoperatively.
|
|
Visual analog pain score at rest
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively.
|
Ranging from 0 indicating no pain to 10 indicating extreme pain
|
24 hours postoperatively.
|
|
Visual analog pain score at cough
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively.
|
Ranging from 0 indicating no pain to 10 indicating extreme pain
|
24 hours postoperatively.
|
|
Time of first rescue analgesic
Time Frame: 5 minutes before first analgesic request
|
in minutes
|
5 minutes before first analgesic request
|
|
Baseline Heart rate
Time Frame: 5 minutes before anesthesia
|
Beat / minute
|
5 minutes before anesthesia
|
|
Intraoperative Heart rate
Time Frame: every 30 minutes along operation
|
Beat / minute
|
every 30 minutes along operation
|
|
Baseline mean arterial blood pressure
Time Frame: 5 minutes before anesthesia
|
mmHg
|
5 minutes before anesthesia
|
|
Intraoperative mean arterial blood pressure
Time Frame: every 30 minutes along operation
|
mmHg
|
every 30 minutes along operation
|
|
Baseline oxygen saturation
Time Frame: 5 minutes before anesthesia
|
percentage with pulse oximetry
|
5 minutes before anesthesia
|
|
Intraoperative oxygen saturation
Time Frame: every 30 minutes along operation
|
percentage with pulse oximetry
|
every 30 minutes along operation
|
|
Total length of stay in hospital
Time Frame: 1-2 days
|
in days
|
1-2 days
|
|
Patient satisfaction score
Time Frame: 12 hours after end of operation and extubation
|
5 degree Likeart scale where 1 Extremely satisfied to 5 Extremely not satisfied
|
12 hours after end of operation and extubation
|
|
Incidence of hematoma
Time Frame: 30 minutes after nerve block
|
Yes or no
|
30 minutes after nerve block
|
|
Incidence of local anesthetic toxicity
Time Frame: 30 minutes after nerve block
|
Yes or no
|
30 minutes after nerve block
|
|
Incidence of nausea
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperative
|
Yes or no
|
24 hours postoperative
|
|
Incidence of vomiting
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperative
|
Yes or no
|
24 hours postoperative
|
|
Ramsay sedation score
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperative
|
From 1 to 5 (1 Awake; agitated or restless or both - 2 Awake; cooperative, oriented, and tranquil - 3 Awake but responds to commands only - 4 Asleep; brisk response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus - 5 Asleep; sluggish response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus) Asleep; no response to glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus |
24 hours postoperative
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Age
Time Frame: 5 minutes before entering operation department
|
in years
|
5 minutes before entering operation department
|
|
Sex
Time Frame: 5 minutes before entering operation department
|
Male of female
|
5 minutes before entering operation department
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Mohamed A Hamed, MD, Fayoum University
- Study Chair: Mahdy A Abdelhady, MD, Fayoum University
- Study Director: Mina M Sobhy, MD, Fayoum University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Altiparmak B, Korkmaz Toker M, Uysal AI, Dere O, Ugur B. Evaluation of ultrasound-guided rhomboid intercostal nerve block for postoperative analgesia in breast cancer surgery: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Apr;45(4):277-282. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-101114. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
- Hassan ME, Wadod MAA. Serratus anterior plane block and erector spinae plane block in postoperative analgesia in thoracotomy: A randomised controlled study. Indian J Anaesth. 2022 Feb;66(2):119-125. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_257_21. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
- Longo F, Piliego C. Rhomboid intercostal and subserratus plane block for non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2020 May;61:109612. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.09.006. Epub 2019 Oct 24. No abstract available. Erratum In: J Clin Anesth. 2020 Aug;63:109789. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109789.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- D404
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pain
-
Flowonix MedicalApproved for marketingBack Pain | Leg Pain | Trunk Pain | Intractable Pain | Arm Pain
-
Boston Scientific CorporationRecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Leg Pain | Intractable Pain | Chronic Leg PainUnited States
-
University Hospital Schleswig-HolsteinZealand University Hospital; European Regional Development Fund; Design School...CompletedPain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | Pain Measurement | Pain, CancerGermany
-
Universitat Jaume ICompletedPain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | OncologySpain
-
Qi's ClinicNot yet recruitingNon-Cancer Pain,Musculoskeletal Pain,Chronic Pain,Acute Pain
-
University of Campinas, BrazilCompletedPREGNANCY | LUMBAR BACK PAIN | PELVIC PAIN
-
noiVita SrlsUniversity of Eastern PiedmontCompletedCervical Pain | Pain Management | Lumbar Pain | Muscular | Chronic Pain (Back / Neck)Italy
-
Chinese University of Hong KongNot yet recruitingPain, Acute | Chronic Post Operative Pain | Pain, ChronicHong Kong
-
Dow University of Health SciencesRecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Mechanical Low Back Pain | Pain, Chronic | Pain, Back | Lower Back Pain Chronic | CLBP - Chronic Low Back PainPakistan
-
University of SaskatchewanRoyal University Hospital FoundationCompletedPain | Pain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | Pain, IntractableCanada
Clinical Trials on Ultrasound
-
Ahram Canadian UniversityCompletedCarpal Tunnel Syndrome | Median Neuropathy, Carpal TunnelEgypt
-
Eskisehir Osmangazi UniversityCompletedCarpal Tunnel Syndrome
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Withdrawn
-
Cairo UniversityUnknown
-
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterWithdrawn
-
Oregon Health and Science UniversityRecruiting
-
Yale UniversityCompletedPneumonia | Pulmonary Edema | DyspneaUnited States
-
Odense University HospitalEnrolling by invitationThoracic Ultrasound | Fibrosing Interstitial Lung DiseasesDenmark
-
Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Education and Research HospitalCompletedShoulder Impingement Syndrome | Shoulder PainTurkey
-
John PelleritoGeneral ElectricActive, not recruiting