The Management of Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection Wounds With Cytal® Wound Matrix and MicroMatrix®

March 30, 2026 updated by: Benjamin T. Miller
This is a prospective, pilot, parallel group, randomized controlled trial with 1:1 allocation. This will be a single center study coordinated at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation (CCF) Main Campus in Cleveland, Ohio. Data will be collected in a secure manner using REDCap housed at CCF. The study will consist of 2 arms: treatment with Cytal® Wound Matrix 2-Layer and MicroMatrix® (Integra LifeSciences, Plainsboro Township, NJ, U.S.A.) versus standard of care dressings. Wound debridement procedures will be performed by surgical staff at CCF. A co-investigator trained in the application of Cytal® Wound Matrix and MicroMatrix® will apply these treatments as outlined in section 6.1.2 Administration. This study will be conducted with IRB approval and written informed consent of each participant enrolled. The trial will be registered at ClinicalTrials.gov before the first participant is enrolled.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a type of soft tissue infection that is characterized by necrosis of the subcutaneous tissues and muscle fascia. Prompt diagnosis and surgical exploration are crucial in the management of these potentially fatal infections.1,2 For most patients, this requires an initial extensive, wide debridement with repeated inspection and debridement every 24-48 hours to remove all necrotic tissue.3 As a result, tissue reconstruction often necessitates flap surgery with autologous, split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) for sufficient coverage. The process during which the wound bed becomes ready for skin grafting can be lengthy, arduous, and often times costly. Post-discharge regimens may consist of pain management for daily dressing changes, nutritional supplements, multiple follow up visits in clinic and likely the involvement of a plastic and reconstructive surgeon.4 Therefore, strategies to promote the healing of these wounds may significantly improve the morbidity of this disease.

One such adjunct to the management of wounds is the use of mammalian-derived extracellular matrices (ECM). Multiple published case reports have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of ECM in the healing process of complex wounds.5-12 A randomized controlled trial was conducted in patients with chronic venous ulcers using an ECM derived from the submucosal layers of the porcine jejunum.8 Their findings demonstrated significant improvement in wound healing as compared to a standard-care group at 12 weeks of treatment (55% vs 34%, p = 0.196).

Cytal® and MicroMatrix® (Integra LifeSciences, Plainsboro Township, NJ, U.S.A.) are acellular, ECM products derived from porcine bladder epithelial basement membrane and tunica propria. It is thought that these products provide an optimal environment for healing by providing a scaffold for tissue regeneration and promoting neovascularization. These products have previously been demonstrated to improve healing in NF wounds.9-12 However, to date, there have been no randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of ECM in the healing of NF wounds. We hypothesize that wound beds treated with Cytal® and MicroMatrix® will have a significantly decreased time to skin graft readiness as compared to those treated with standard of care wound management.

This is a prospective, pilot, parallel group, randomized controlled trial with 1:1 allocation. This will be a single center study coordinated at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation (CCF) Main Campus in Cleveland, Ohio. Data will be collected in a secure manner using REDCap housed at CCF. The study will consist of 2 arms: treatment with Cytal® Wound Matrix 2-Layer and MicroMatrix® (Integra LifeSciences, Plainsboro Township, NJ, U.S.A.) versus standard of care dressings. Wound debridement procedures will be performed by surgical staff at CCF. A co-investigator trained in the application of Cytal® Wound Matrix and MicroMatrix® will apply these treatments as outlined in section 6.1.2 Administration. This study will be conducted with IRB approval and written informed consent of each participant enrolled. The trial will be registered at ClinicalTrials.gov before the first participant is enrolled.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Recruiting
        • Cleveland Clinic
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Benjamin Miller, MD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adults (≥ 18 years) with a diagnosis of necrotizing fasciitis
  2. Wound ≥ 30 cm2
  3. The participant is willing and able to adhere to protocol requirements and agrees to participate in the study program and comply with the study follow-up regimen.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Burn as etiology of wound
  2. Acute osteomyelitis requiring active treatment
  3. Known allergy, hypersensitivity, or objection to porcine materials
  4. Pregnant participants
  5. Lack of English language fluency
  6. Participant report of concurrent participation in another clinical trial that would interfere with this study
  7. Inability to consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Standard of Care Arm
Experimental: Interventional arm
This arm will receive application of Cytal® Wound Matrix and MicroMatrix®
This is the only study to use this intervention in necrotizing soft tissue wounds
This is the only study to use this intervention in necrotizing soft tissue wounds

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Time to readiness for grafting of the wound bed
Time Frame: From randomization to readiness for grating, up to 12 weeks
From randomization to readiness for grating, up to 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Relative wound healing as assessed by the Photographic Wound Assessment Tool (PWAT)
Time Frame: From randomization to readiness for grating, up to 12 weeks
Relative wound healing as assessed by the Photographic Wound Assessment Tool (PWAT) between the two study arms
From randomization to readiness for grating, up to 12 weeks
Assess the relative rate of wound infection, seroma, hematoma, and need for re-intervention (including incision and drainage)
Time Frame: From randomization to readiness for grating, up to 12 weeks
To assess the relative rate of wound infection, seroma, hematoma, and need for re-intervention (including incision and drainage) between the treated and untreated wound beds
From randomization to readiness for grating, up to 12 weeks
To assess the rate of product excision resulting from wound complications, allergic reaction, or intolerance to the product
Time Frame: From randomization to readiness for grating, up to 12 weeks
From randomization to readiness for grating, up to 12 weeks
To assess relative rates of wound closure, measured as the proportion of the remaining wound area compared to the starting wound area
Time Frame: From randomization to readiness for grating, up to 12 weeks
From randomization to readiness for grating, up to 12 weeks
To assess relative skin graft size as a percentage of starting wound area
Time Frame: From randomization to readiness for grating, up to 12 weeks
From randomization to readiness for grating, up to 12 weeks
To assess the relative percentages of skin graft take
Time Frame: From randomization to readiness for grating, up to 12 weeks
From randomization to readiness for grating, up to 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 5, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 27, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 3, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB 23-1221

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection

Clinical Trials on Cytal® Wound Matrix

Subscribe