Comparison of Denervation Techniques for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: Continuous Ablative Radiofrequency Vs. Chemical Denervation with Absolute Alcohol

March 6, 2025 updated by: Leonardo Henrique Cunha Ferraro, Federal University of São Paulo

Comparison of Denervation Techniques for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: a Randomized Clinical Trial of Continuous Ablative Radiofrequency Vs. Chemical Denervation with Absolute Alcohol

This randomized clinical trial compares two minimally invasive treatments for knee osteoarthritis pain that has not responded to conventional therapies. The study evaluates the effectiveness and safety of continuous ablative radiofrequency, which uses heat energy to disrupt pain signals, and chemical denervation with absolute alcohol, which involves an injection to reduce pain transmission. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the treatments, and their pain levels, mobility, and quality of life will be monitored over time to determine which method provides better pain relief.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This randomized clinical trial compares continuous ablative radiofrequency and chemical denervation with absolute alcohol for pain relief in patients with knee osteoarthritis refractory to conventional treatments. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two procedures, with outcomes assessed based on pain reduction, functional improvement, quality of life, and safety. Follow-ups will be conducted for up to six months to evaluate the durability of pain relief, providing evidence to guide clinical management of chronic knee osteoarthritis pain.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

288

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • SP
      • São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 04024002
        • Federal University of Sao Paulo - Hospital Sao Paulo,
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged ≥ 18 years.
  • Knee pain for more than 3 months.
  • Clinical and imaging-confirmed diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis, based on X-ray, ultrasound, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of major joint interventions, such as previous knee surgery or arthroplasty.
  • Severe joint effusion.
  • Coagulation disorders or other clinical contraindications for the procedure.
  • Uncontrolled comorbidities that increase procedural risk.
  • Body mass index (BMI) > 35.
  • Cognitive impairment that affects the ability to understand and respond to pain assessment instruments.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Continuous Ablative Radiofrequency
Participants in this arm will undergo continuous ablative radiofrequency targeting the sensory genicular nerves responsible for knee pain. The procedure involves the percutaneous insertion of a radiofrequency probe near the targeted nerves under imaging guidance. Controlled thermal energy will be applied to create a lesion, disrupting pain signal transmission. The goal is to provide long-lasting pain relief and improve function in patients with knee osteoarthritis.
Continuous ablative radiofrequency is a minimally invasive neuroablative procedure that targets the sensory genicular nerves to manage pain in knee osteoarthritis. Under ultrasound guidance, a radiofrequency probe is inserted percutaneously near the target nerves. The procedure delivers continuous thermal energy at 80°C for 120 seconds, creating a controlled lesion that disrupts pain signal transmission. This technique is distinct from pulsed radiofrequency, as it aims for permanent nerve ablation rather than neuromodulation. The expected outcome is prolonged pain relief and improved function in patients with chronic knee osteoarthritis refractory to conservative treatments.
Active Comparator: Chemical Denervation with Absolute Alcohol
Participants in this arm will undergo chemical denervation with absolute alcohol, targeting the sensory genicular nerves responsible for knee pain. The procedure involves the percutaneous injection of absolute alcohol near the selected nerves under imaging guidance. The neurolytic effect of alcohol disrupts pain signal transmission, aiming to provide prolonged pain relief and functional improvement in patients with knee osteoarthritis.
Chemical denervation with absolute alcohol is a minimally invasive neurolytic procedure targeting the sensory genicular nerves to manage chronic knee osteoarthritis pain. Under ultrasound guidance, a percutaneous injection of absolute alcohol 66% is administered near the targeted nerves. The neurolytic effect of alcohol induces axonal degeneration and Wallerian degeneration, leading to prolonged disruption of pain signal transmission. This intervention differs from radiofrequency ablation as it achieves chemical neurolysis rather than thermal ablation, with potential for a distinct duration of analgesia and varying nerve regeneration patterns. The expected outcome is long-lasting pain relief and improved function in patients with knee osteoarthritis who have not responded to conservative treatments.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Score
Time Frame: 6 months
a validated questionnaire used to assess pain, stiffness, and physical function in patients with knee osteoarthritis. It consists of 24 items divided into three subscales: pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items), and physical function (17 items). Each item is rated on a Likert scale (0-4), with higher scores indicating greater pain, stiffness, and functional impairment. The total WOMAC score will be measured at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-intervention to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatments in improving knee osteoarthritis symptoms.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for Pain
Time Frame: 6 months
The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) is an 11-point scale (0-10) used to assess pain intensity, where 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 indicates "worst pain imaginable." Participants will rate their pain at rest and during movement at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-intervention. The NRS is a widely used and validated tool for quantifying pain perception, allowing for objective comparison of pain relief between continuous ablative radiofrequency and chemical denervation with absolute alcohol.
6 months
Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36)
Time Frame: 6 months
The SF-36 (Short Form-36 Health Survey) is a validated questionnaire used to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) across eight domains: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional health, and mental health. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health status and quality of life. The SF-36 will be administered at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-intervention to evaluate the impact of continuous ablative radiofrequency and chemical denervation with absolute alcohol on the overall well-being of patients with knee
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 27, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain

Clinical Trials on Continuous Ablative Radiofrequency

Subscribe