Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy (HAIC) Combined With Durvalumab and Lenvatinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: a Phase 2 Study(HAIC-quad Trial) (HAIC-quad)

March 5, 2026 updated by: Wen Tianfu, West China Hospital
At present, the first-line treatment for patients with advanced unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is mainly systemic treatment, but the improvement in efficacy is limited and is not enough to meet the current clinical treatment needs. Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has the advantages of increasing local drug concentration and reducing toxic side effects compared to systemic intravenous chemotherapy. In order to enable patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma to obtain better treatment effects, this study plans to explore HAIC combined with durvalumab and lenvatinib as the first-line treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic ICC, in order to provide a better treatment choice for their comprehensive treatment.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

25

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Sichuan
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, China
        • Recruiting
        • West China Hospital, Sichuan University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Histologically confirmed intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, with a preliminary diagnosis of unresectable or metastatic disease and no previous systemic treatment.

    Anatomical factors: ① Patients with invasion of the portal vein, hepatic vein or main bile duct, who cannot undergo resection and reconstruction; ② Patients with decompensated cirrhosis or severe portal hypertension, and the residual liver FLR does not meet the safe liver resection decision-making system Biological factors: ① Multiple tumors in the left and right livers; ② Metastasis to distant lymph nodes such as the para-aorta or distant organ metastasis

  2. Disease recurrence > 6 months after radical surgery; if adjuvant therapy is given after surgery, patients > 6 months after completion of adjuvant therapy (chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy) are eligible for inclusion.
  3. WHO/ECOG PS of 0 or 1
  4. There was at least 1 target lesion (TL) that met the RECIST 1.1 criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who have received systemic treatment in the past.
  2. Patients with severe liver dysfunction (Child-Pugh C grade), or significant jaundice, hepatic encephalopathy, refractory ascites, or hepatorenal syndrome.
  3. Patients with severe and uncorrectable coagulation dysfunction.
  4. Patients with active hepatitis or severe infection who cannot be treated simultaneously.
  5. Patients with cachexia or multiple organ failure.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: HAIC-quad Arm
Durvalumab: During combination therapy: 1500 mg, Q3W, during combination therapy, on days 3-5 of each 3-week cycle (determined by the investigator); during maintenance therapy: 1500 mg Q4W
hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) : GemCis regimen was adopted, with the specific regimen as follows: cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on the first day, arterial infusion for half an hour, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on the first day, arterial infusion for half an hour, repeated once every 3 weeks, and 4-6 cycles of treatment (the specific number of cycles was determined by the investigator according to the patient's condition).
Lenvatinib 8mg (weight <60 kg) or 12mg (weight ≥60 kg) oral QD, during combination therapy, starting on day 3 of each 3-week cycle (determined by the investigator)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Time Frame: Up to approximately 26 months
Disease assessments based on investigator assessments were determined by using RECIST version 1.1 guidelines. The ORR was defined as the percentage of patients with confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR). The CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. The PR was defined as >= 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions (compared to baseline) and no new non-target lesion. A confirmed CR or PR was defined as 2 CRs or 2 PRs with no evidence of progression in-between. Patients who discontinued randomized treatment without progression, received a subsequent anti-cancer therapy and then responded were not included as responders for ORR.
Up to approximately 26 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: Up to approximately 36 months
Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause. Any patient not known to have died at the time of analysis was censored based on the last recorded date on which the patient was known to be alive. Median OS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.
Up to approximately 36 months
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: Up to approximately 26 months
PFS based on investigator assessments according to RECIST version 1.1 was defined as time from date of randomization until date of objective disease progression or death (by any cause in the absence of progression), regardless of whether the patient withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anticancer therapy prior to progression. Progression (i.e., PD) was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (TLs) and an absolute increase of ≥5mm, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters since treatment started including the baseline sum of diameters, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. Median PFS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.
Up to approximately 26 months
Number of Participants Who Experience One or More Adverse Events (AE)
Time Frame: Up to approximately 36 months
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it was considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurred during the course of the study.
Up to approximately 36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 6, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 6, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 27, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 5, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 9, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Durvalumab

Clinical Trials on Durvalumab

Subscribe