Effect of PechaKucha (PK)Presentation Method on Nursing Students' Satisfaction Level With Deep Breathing and Cough Exercise Skills and Education Method

March 2, 2025 updated by: Vildan Budak, Eastern Mediterranean University

Effect of PechaKucha (PK) Presentation Method on Nursing Students' Satisfaction Level With Deep Breathing and Cough Exercise Skills and Education Method

ABSTRACT

Aim: The aim of this study is to examine the effect of the PK presentation method on nursing students' deep breathing and cough exercise skills and the students' level of satisfaction with this method.

Design: The sample of the study consisted of students studying in the 2nd year of the Nursing Department of a foundation university and taking the Fundamentals of Nursing course (n=96). Experimental (n=48) and control (n=48) groups were determined using a randomization program. While the students in the experimental group were taught deep breathing and cough exercises with the PK presentation method, the control group was trained with a traditional Power Point presentation. As data collection tools, student information form, deep breathing and cough exercise skill checklist and Visual Analog Scale measurement tool were used to determine the level of satisfaction with the training method.

Keywords: PechaKucha, Nursing students, respiratory exercise, satisfaction

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

96

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Mersin, Turkey, 34381
        • Eastern Mediterranean University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Inclusion criteria Taking the Fundamentals of Nursing course for the first time attending the course on the day of the course

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Students taking the course for the second time and those who did not attend the course on the day of the training were excluded from the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PK Presentation
Giving Deep Breathing and Cough exercises with PK presentation method
Ability to apply deep breathing and cough exercise skills will be examined.
The level of satisfaction with the training provided will be determined with the PechaKucha presentation.
Active Comparator: Power Point Presentation
Giving Deep Breathing and Cough exercises using traditional Power Point presentation method
Ability to apply deep breathing and cough exercise skills will be examined.
The level of satisfaction with the training provided will be determined with the PechaKucha presentation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Satisfaction level of Deep Breathing and Cough Exercise Skills Training given with PechaKucha presentation method
Time Frame: 3 day
Visual Analog Scale A visual analog scale was used to measure students' satisfaction levels with the given training method, where students can score between 1 and 10..
3 day
Effect of PechaKucha presentation method on Deep Breathing and cough exercise skills
Time Frame: 3 day
The steps of the Deep Breathing and Cough Exercise were prepared in accordance with the literature. Expert opinions were obtained for the scope validity of the prepared checklist according to the Davis technique. According to this technique, expert opinions are graded in 4 stages; 1-"Not appropriate", 2-"Item needs to be brought into appropriate form", 3-"Appropriate but minor changes are required", 4-"Very appropriate". The number of experts who gave 3 and 4 points to all items in the scale is divided by the total number of experts who received opinions and the Scope Validity Index (CVI) is obtained. In order for the items to be evaluated as sufficient in terms of scope validity, the "Scope Validity Index" must be above 0.80 [15]. In this technique, opinions are obtained from at least 3 and at most 20 experts. In this direction, expert opinions were obtained from 9 faculty members specialized in the field of Fundamentals of Nursing for the scope validity of the checklist.
3 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Seda Cevheroglu, Assit. Dr., Eastern Mediterranean University
  • Study Director: Vildan Budak, MScN, Eastern Mediterranean University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 20, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 25, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 28, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 22, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

will be re-evaluated at the end of the study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on PechaKucha Presentation

Clinical Trials on Deep Breathing and Cough Exercise Skills

Subscribe