Ultrasound Guided Serratus Anterior Plane Block Versus Thoracic Erector Spinae Plane Block for Post Operative Analgesia in Pediatrics Undergoing Thoracotomy

March 2, 2025 updated by: Sarah Elsayed Mohamed Mohamed Hassan, Tanta University

Ultrasound Guided Serratus Anterior Plane Block Versus Thoracic Erector Spinae Plane Block for Post Operative Analgesia in Pediatrics Undergoing Thoracotomy: A Randomized Controlled Stud

This study is designed to compare the post operative analgesic effect of serratus anterior plane block versus thoracic erector spinae plane block in pediatrics undergoing thoracotomy

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The incidence of diseases that requires thoracotomy is low in the pediatric age group. Thoracotomy is a severe burden on children and is widely known to cause severe acute pain. This pain can be very distressing for both children and their parents. If not treated properly, it may acutely cause retention of secretion, atelectasis, ventilation-perfusion disorder and hypoxemia, together with a change in lung mechanics.

The serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) has also recently become more popular options for post-thoracotomy analgesia. SAPB involves local anesthetic injection in a plane superficial or deep to the serratus anterior muscle; in both these locations, it blocks the lateral cutaneous branches of intercostal nerves.

The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is an ultrasound-guided deep plane interfascial block defined by Forero in 2016. It has been shown to provide thoracic and abdominal analgesia. When injected at the T5 transverse process level, the local anesthetic spreads anteriorly through the thoracolumbar fascia and reaches the ventral and dorsal rami of the spinal nerves and posteriorly to the gray and white rami communicantes of the sympathetic chain, providing a C7 to T8 sensitive block. Although it was first described as a chronic pain block, there are increasingly reports about its use in postoperative acute pain.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

105

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • El-Gharbia
      • Tanta, El-Gharbia, Egypt, 31527
        • Tanta University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient aged between 2 and 7 years.
  • Patient posted for the right or left thoracotomy under general anesthesia.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Parents who refuse regional anesthesia.
  • Children who had any coagulation abnormality.
  • Deformity of the thoracolumbar spine.
  • Infection at the site of injection.
  • History of allergy to the local anesthetics.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control group
Patients will receive general anesthesia alone
Patients will receive general anesthesia alone
Other Names:
  • General anesthesia
Experimental: Serratus Anterior Plane Block (SAPB) group
Patients will receive general anesthesia (GA) with ultrasound guided serratus anterior plane block 0.5 ml/kg 0.25% bupivacaine.
Patients will receive general anesthesia (GA) with ultrasound guided serratus anterior plane block 0.5 ml/kg 0.25% bupivacaine.
Other Names:
  • General anesthesia (GA) with bupivacaine
Experimental: Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) group
Patients will receive general anesthesia (GA) with ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block 0.5 ml/kg 0.25% bupivacaine.
Patients will receive general anesthesia (GA) with ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block 0.5 ml/kg 0.25% bupivacaine
Other Names:
  • General anesthesia (GA) with bupivacaine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total rescue analgesia consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Rescue analgesia is planned based on the patients' face, leg, activity, cry, consolability score (FLACC) scores. Morphine 0.05 mg/kg IV was given as rescue analgesia in the case of FLACC scores above 3.The analgesic requirements in the first 24 h postoperatively were recorded.
24 hours postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to 1st rescue analgesic requirement
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Time to 1st request for the rescue of analgesia (time from the end of surgery till first dose of morphine administrated) was recorded.
24 hours postoperatively
Degree of pain
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Pain was assessed after surgery over 24 hours using face, leg, activity, cry, consolability score (FLACC) score at following times: 0 (baseline), 1, 3, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h postoperative. FLACC score is used for pain assessment. (Face, legs, activity, cry and Consolability) is a measurement used to assess pain in children between age of 2 to 7 years or individuals that are unable to communicate their pain. The scale is scored in a range of 0 to 10 with 0 representing no pain, 10 representing the maximum and we start to give rescue analgesia at score 4.
24 hours postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 2, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The data will be available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author after the end of study for one year.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After the end of study for one year.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The data will be available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Thoracotomy

Clinical Trials on Control group

Subscribe