Holistic Integration for Healthy Longevity and Aging in Place (HIHOPE)

March 20, 2025 updated by: National Taiwan University Clinical Trial Center, National Taiwan University Hospital

Holistic Integration for Healthy Longevity and Aging in Place - Establishing Full-spectrum Community-based Care System for Older People to Maintain Wellbeing Pursuing Abilities

Background:

Taiwan is experiencing rapid population aging, with a growing prevalence of chronic diseases and functional impairments among older adults. Existing Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) programs focus primarily on screening but lack sufficient follow-up and intervention. In response, the HI-HOPE Project was developed to establish a community-based, multidisciplinary intervention model to enhance intrinsic capacity and promote healthy aging in rural elderly populations.

Survey and Screening:

The study will be conducted in 30 community centers across Yunlin County, targeting older adults aged ≥55 years. Participants will undergo biannual screenings over two years, assessing cognitive function, depression, mobility, vitality (nutrition), hearing, vision, osteoporosis, polypharmacy, urological health, and social participation & welfare.

Intervention:

Participants will be randomly assigned to either:

HI-HOPE Integrated Care Group:

On-Site Community Interventions: Exercise training, mindfulness, social activities, oral and swallowing rehabilitation, hearing and vision training.

Telehealth & Remote Education: Digital health monitoring, remote consultations, and health education.

Referral Services: Access to specialized medical care, transportation assistance, and follow-up support.

Control Group: Standard community care services without additional structured interventions.

Outcome Measures:

Primary outcomes include changes in intrinsic capacity of functional health metrics, including abnormalities of I-COPE components (mobility, cognitive status, depression, hearing, vision, vitality) . Secondary outcomes assess quality of life, activities of daily living, hospitalization, emergency visits, falls, and mortality rates over two years.

Significance:

This project integrates digital health technologies, interdisciplinary care, and community-based interventions to improve elderly health outcomes. The findings will guide the future scalability of integrated aging care models in Taiwan and beyond.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

General Introduction As the population ages, the prevalence of chronic diseases and functional impairments is increasing. Since 1980, the proportion of people aged 65 and older in Taiwan has been steadily rising, and in 2018, Taiwan officially became an aged society. It is projected to reach the status of a super-aged society by 2025. Achieving healthy longevity is a shared goal in an aging society. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the purpose of promoting healthy aging is to help older adults maintain their physical functions, allowing them to engage in activities that bring them happiness. Maintaining intrinsic capacity is a key aspect of this goal. However, many elderly individuals experience multiple chronic diseases and polypharmacy, physical decline, reduced cognitive and learning abilities, and socio-economic disadvantages. These factors contribute to the progressive deterioration of their intrinsic capacity, posing significant challenges to achieving healthy aging.

Since 2018, National Taiwan University Hospital Yunlin Branch has actively reached out to remote rural communities, providing high-quality and convenient medical and health services to the elderly in Yunlin County. Observations over the years have shown that the prevalence of metabolic syndrome among the elderly in rural Yunlin is significantly high. Nutritional imbalances have led to 35.35% of elderly individuals having a BMI above the normal range, while 48.4% have stage II hypertension. Sarcopenia is also a concerning issue: 50.36% of seniors exhibit low grip strength, 16.82% require more than 16 seconds to complete five sit-to-stand movements, and 77.92% show signs of lower limb weakness in a 3-meter walk test. Compared to other regions in Taiwan and internationally, the elderly in Yunlin demonstrate lower physical fitness levels, highlighting the need for greater attention and assistance in ensuring their health and well-being.

Currently, a person-centered, community-based, integrated multidisciplinary assessment and intervention approach is the mainstream method for promoting health among older adults, supported by international evidence. The Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) model, proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO), identifies six key intrinsic capacities that need to be maintained for healthy aging: cognition, mobility, nutrition, depression, hearing, and vision. In 2017, WHO published community-level intervention guidelines that provided detailed assessments and recommendations for integrated community-based care. The guidelines emphasize resource integration, follow-up interventions, and a well-structured healthcare support system to enhance community-wide care.

The Health Promotion Administration (HPA) of Taiwan's Ministry of Health and Welfare has actively promoted the ICOPE framework. In 2021, it launched a pilot program for assessing and preventing functional decline in older adults, led by local health departments. By 2023, this initiative had expanded to all 22 counties and cities across Taiwan, with hospitals and medical institutions collaborating to conduct screenings. However, the current ICOPE implementation model is still primarily hospital-centered, making it less accessible to older adults in remote or mobility-limited communities.

A literature review and expert discussions indicate that Taiwan's ICOPE model focuses mainly on screening, with insufficient follow-up and referral systems. Due to the diverse and complex health issues faced by older adults, implementing follow-up care remains a major challenge. For example, in Yunlin County, nearly 8,000 screening surveys were completed in 2022, yet half of those who needed follow-up assessments did not receive referrals, and 95% of cases lacked follow-up within six months. Despite significant efforts by Yunlin's health authorities to implement ICOPE, the lack of case management personnel and a comprehensive medical support system has made intervention and follow-up care difficult. Thus, establishing a structured intervention model and improving implementation strategies is crucial for the future development of ICOPE in Taiwan.

Currently, various health promotion programs operate independently, often lacking sufficient cross-sector communication. This results in low service utilization rates due to unclear resource availability for elderly individuals and caregivers. Different approaches to community-based elderly care-such as hospital referrals, on-site community interventions, and telehealth monitoring-should be integrated to provide the most appropriate care and support.

To address these challenges, National Taiwan University Hospital Yunlin Branch is leveraging its experience in the Apollo Community Care Model, in collaboration with The National Health Research Institutes Aging and Health Welfare Research Center, The Yunlin County Government, and Yunlin University of Science and Technology. This initiative introduces the HI-HOPE Project, which focuses on

A senior-centered, community-based model A ten-core functional assessment and intervention strategy Integrated medical and digital health resources Interdisciplinary collaboration to enhance elderly well-being

The HI-HOPE Project builds upon existing community-based elderly care programs, particularly the pharmaceutical care model for polypharmacy management and the osteoporosis and sarcopenia risk assessment project in Yunlin County. Using these programs as a foundation, HI-HOPE will implement clustered randomized controlled trials (RCTs) across 30 community sites in Yunlin County, targeting older adults aged 55 and above. The project will establish two groups, including HI-HOPE Integrated Care Group (10 communities) and Control Group (20 communities). The HI-HOPE group expands upon WHO's ICOPE six dimensions, adding osteoporosis, polypharmacy, urological health, and social welfare, creating a comprehensive ten-core framework. Social welfare services will integrate existing government programs such as cancer screening, digital health, and long-term care resources.

The intervention model consists of three primary components:

On-Site Community Interventions - Including exercise training, mindfulness meditation, social participation activities, oral and swallowing rehabilitation, hearing rehabilitation, and vision training.

Telehealth and Remote Education - Leveraging digital technologies for health education, monitoring, and consultations.

Referral Services - Facilitating access to medical care, transportation assistance, and follow-up support.

The project will run for two years, with biannual screenings to track changes in intrinsic capacity, core health functions, and life events, such as falls, fractures, emergency visits, hospitalizations, and mortality.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

600

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥55 years (includes older adults and pre-elderly individuals).
  • No severe functional disability (must be able to walk independently, use assistive devices, or operate a wheelchair independently).
  • No severe cognitive impairment (must be able to respond appropriately to verbal questions).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Irregular community participation (less than once per week in the target community).
  • Mild dementia or greater (assessed during screening). If identified, family members will be notified, and they retain the right to withdraw the participant unconditionally.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention

The HI-HOPE Project implements a three-phase intervention over 48 weeks, integrating cognitive, physical, and social engagement strategies.

Phase 1 (12 Weeks): Focuses on cognitive stimulation, depression relief, and music-based movement therapy. Includes weekly high-intensity exercise (3 hours/week).

Phase 2 (12 Weeks): Covers all six ICOPE domains with community-led wellness sessions and weekly high-intensity exercise (3 hours/week).

Phase 3 (12 Weeks): Intensive strength and mobility training (2 hours/week).

Referral Process: Individuals with abnormal screenings receive personalized support, including transportation aid, financial assistance, telehealth, and group referrals.

Digital Health: Uses telehealth consultations, medication tracking, and nutritional assessments to enhance care access and monitor intervention outcomes.

HI-HOPE Project introduces a three-phase intervention program Phase 1: "Active Mind & Body" (12 Weeks) Focus: Cognitive enhancement, depression relief, and music-based movement therapy.

Delivery: Certified community instructors. Schedule: 1 session/week, 2 hours per session (total 12 sessions). Supplementary Exercise: High-intensity training by professional coaches (1 session/week, 1 hour per session).

Phase 2: "Complete Senior Wellness" (12 Weeks) Focus: Comprehensive functional improvement covering all six ICOPE domains. Delivery: Certified community instructors. Schedule: 1 session/week, 2 hours per session (total 12 sessions). Supplementary Exercise: High-intensity training by professional coaches (1 session/week, 1 hour per session).

Phase 3: "Advanced Exercise Training" (12 Weeks) Focus: Strengthening self-care abilities and increasing acceptance of medical interventions.

Delivery: Professional exercise coaches. Schedule: 2 sessions/week, 1 hour per session (total 24 sessions).

Self-referral tracking (1-2 weeks): Participants able to visit referral sites independently will be followed up to confirm completion.

Barrier assessment: If unable to attend, interviews will identify obstacles (e.g., transport, finances, willingness).

Transportation support: Solutions include volunteer transport with fuel subsidies, local transport networks, and government-assisted group referrals.

Financial assistance: Eligibility for social welfare aid will be assessed, with support for applications.

Personal willingness & health literacy: Health education will address concerns about treatment or social stigma.

Telehealth consultations: Remote specialist consultations will be provided if in-person visits are not possible.

Hospital-based referral support: Group hospital visits will be arranged for those with referral difficulties.

Monthly tracking: Referral completion rates and outcomes will be monitored (e.g., treatments, assistive devices, social services).

Live-streamed health education across multiple community sites.

Digital health platforms for real-time intervention monitoring and professional feedback:

Polypharmacy management via medication usage tracking and pharmacist analysis. Nutritional assessment with dietitian recommendations. Health consultations provided remotely by specialists based on screening results.

No Intervention: Control

Participants in the control group will undergo the same baseline and follow-up assessments as the intervention group. After evaluation, they will be informed of any abnormal findings and provided with recommendations for appropriate medical referrals based on standard care practices.

However, no additional referral assistance, intervention programs, or follow-up services will be provided beyond the basic healthcare guidance currently available in the community.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intrinsic capacity
Time Frame: The primary outcome (intrinsic capacity) will be assessed every six months over a two-year period, totaling four evaluations throughout the study duration.
The primary outcome is intrinsic capacity, measured by the total number of impaired ICOPE (Integrated Care for Older People) domains (0-6). Impairment criteria are: (1) Cognitive: Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) <24; (2) Depression: Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) >6; (3) Mobility: Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) ≤9; (4) Vitality: Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF) ≤11; (5) Vision: ICOPE-WHO Simple Vision Test abnormal if failing distance/near vision tests or having an eye disease/chronic condition (e.g., diabetes, hypertension) without an eye exam in the past year; (6) Hearing: ICOPE Whispered Voice Test abnormal. Each domain is assessed separately and classified as either impaired (0) or not impaired (1) based on the predefined criteria. The final intrinsic capacity score is the sum of non-impaired domains (range: 0-6), with higher scores indicating greater intrinsic capacity.
The primary outcome (intrinsic capacity) will be assessed every six months over a two-year period, totaling four evaluations throughout the study duration.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
Time Frame: Every 6 months, for 2 years
Score change in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), range 0-30, lower score indicates higher abnormality.
Every 6 months, for 2 years
Brain Health Test (BHT)
Time Frame: Every 6 months, for 2 years
Score change in Brain Health Test (BHT), range 0-28, lower score indicates higher abnormality.
Every 6 months, for 2 years
Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS-15)
Time Frame: Every 6 months, for 2 years
Score change in Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS-15), range 0-15, higher score indicates more severe depressive symptoms.
Every 6 months, for 2 years
Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI)
Time Frame: Every 12 months, for 2 years
Score change in Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI), range 0-20, higher score indicates more severe anxiety symptoms.
Every 12 months, for 2 years
Chinese Happiness Inventory (CHI)
Time Frame: Every 12 months, for 2 years
Score change in Chinese Happiness Inventory (CHI), range 0-100, higher score indicates greater subjective well-being.
Every 12 months, for 2 years
Handgrip Strength
Time Frame: Every 6 months, for 2 years
Change in Handgrip Strength Test, measured in kilograms (kg), lower score indicates reduced muscle strength.
Every 6 months, for 2 years
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
Time Frame: Every 6 months, for 2 years
Score change in Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), range 0-12, lower score indicates poorer physical performance.
Every 6 months, for 2 years
Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Index (ASMI)
Time Frame: Every 6 months, for 2 years
Score change in Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Index (ASMI), measured in kg/m², lower score indicates lower muscle mass.
Every 6 months, for 2 years
International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)
Time Frame: Every 6 months, for 2 years
Score change in International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), measured in MET-minutes/week, lower score indicates lower physical activity level.
Every 6 months, for 2 years
Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF)
Time Frame: Every 6 months, for 2 years
Score change in Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF), range 0-14, lower score indicates higher risk of malnutrition.
Every 6 months, for 2 years
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time Frame: Every 6 months, for 2 years
Score change in Body Mass Index (BMI), measured in kg/m², lower or higher values outside normal range (18.5-24.9 kg/m²) indicate underweight or overweight/obesity, respectively.
Every 6 months, for 2 years
Oral Frailty Assessment Scale (OF-5)
Time Frame: Every 12 months, for 2 years
Score change in Oral Frailty Assessment Scale (OF-5), range 0-5, higher score indicates greater oral frailty and functional decline.
Every 12 months, for 2 years
Community Periodontal Index (CPI) score
Time Frame: Every 12 months, for 2 years
Score change in Community Periodontal Index (CPI) score, range 0-4, higher score indicates worse periodontal status.
Every 12 months, for 2 years
Loss of Attachment (LA) code
Time Frame: Every 12 months, for 2 years
Score change in Loss of Attachment (LA) code, range 0-4, higher score indicates more severe periodontal attachment loss.
Every 12 months, for 2 years
Decayed, Missing, and Filled Teeth (DMFT)
Time Frame: Every 12 months, for 2 years
Change in number of Decayed, Missing, and Filled Teeth (DMFT), total count of affected teeth, higher number indicates worse dental caries history and oral health status
Every 12 months, for 2 years
Tongue base ultrasonography
Time Frame: Every 12 months, for 2 years
Ultrasonographic measurement of mylohyoid muscle thickness(mm), cross-sectional area of geniohyoid muscle (mm²), cross-sectional area of genioglossus muscle (mm²), total thickness from chin base to tongue upper surface, (mm). Lower value may indicate reduced structural support related to swallowing and speech functions.
Every 12 months, for 2 years
Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly - Short Form, Chinese version (HHIE-C)
Time Frame: Every 12 months, for 2 years
Score change in Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly - Short Form, Chinese version (HHIE-C), range 0-40, higher score indicates greater perceived hearing handicap.
Every 12 months, for 2 years
International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI-SF)
Time Frame: Every 12 months, for 2 years
Score change in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI-SF), range 0-21, higher score indicates greater severity of urinary incontinence and impact on quality of life.
Every 12 months, for 2 years
EuroQol-5 Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: Every 6 months, for 2 years
Score change in EuroQol-5 Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) index score, standarized range -1 to 1, higher score indicates better health-related quality of life.
Every 6 months, for 2 years
Barthel Index (for activities of daily living)
Time Frame: Every 6 months, for 2 years
Score change in Barthel Index (for activities of daily living), range 0-100, higher score indicates greater independence in basic activities of daily living
Every 6 months, for 2 years
Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL)
Time Frame: Every 6 months, for 2 years
Score change in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), range 0-8, higher score indicates greater independence in performing instrumental daily tasks.
Every 6 months, for 2 years
Health Events
Time Frame: Every 3 months, for 2 years
Numbers of falls, fractures, emergency visits, hospitalizations, institutionalization, and mortality tracking.
Every 3 months, for 2 years
Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX)
Time Frame: Before the intervention (baseline) and at 24th month
Score change in Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX), estimated 10-year probability (%) of major osteoporotic fractures and hip fractures, higher percentage indicates greater fracture risk.
Before the intervention (baseline) and at 24th month
Bone Mineral Density (BMD)
Time Frame: Before the intervention (baseline) and at 24th month
Score change in Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA), measured as Bone Mineral Density (BMD) in g/cm² and T-score, lower BMD or T-score indicates higher risk of osteoporosis.
Before the intervention (baseline) and at 24th month
Polypharmacy
Time Frame: Every 6 months, for 2 years
Number of currently used drugs, total count, higher number indicates polypharmacy risk.
Every 6 months, for 2 years
Anticholinergic burden (ACB)
Time Frame: Every 6 months, for 2 years
Anticholinergic burden, cumulative score (0-3) based on medications with anticholinergic properties from reviewed literatures, higher score indicates greater risk of cognitive and physical side effects.
Every 6 months, for 2 years
Potentially Inappropriate Medications (PIMs)
Time Frame: Every 6 months, for 2 years
Number of Potentially Inappropriate Medications (PIMs), total count based on established criteria, higher number indicates greater prescribing risk.
Every 6 months, for 2 years
Number of drugs with fall risk
Time Frame: Every 6 months, for 2 years
Total count of medications associated with increased fall risk
Every 6 months, for 2 years
Number of drug-related problems (DRPs)
Time Frame: Every 6 months, for 2 years
Total identified issues according to The Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe (PCNE), including drug interactions, duplications, inappropriate dosing, higher count indicates greater pharmacotherapy risk.
Every 6 months, for 2 years
ARMS (Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale)
Time Frame: Every 6 months, for 2 years
ARMS (Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale) is a validated questionnaire designed to assess how well individuals adhere to their prescribed medication and refill schedules. It consists of 12 questions (range 12-48), with lower scores indicating better adherence to medication and higher scores suggesting potential issues with adherence.
Every 6 months, for 2 years

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ishihara Color Blindness Test
Time Frame: Every 12 months, for 2 years
Abnormality by Ishihara Color Blindness Test (yea/no)
Every 12 months, for 2 years
AMSLER Grid
Time Frame: Every 12 months, for 2 years
AMSLER Grid, measured as presence (yes/no) of visual distortion or scotoma
Every 12 months, for 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 15, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 5, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sarcopenia

Clinical Trials on Local intervention program

Subscribe