Peri-procedural Management of Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Central VENOus Catheters in CAncer Patients With Venous Thromboembolism or Atrial Fibrillation Pilot Study (VENO CAT)

March 13, 2025 updated by: University Health Network, Toronto

Peri-procedural Management of Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Central VENOus Catheters in CAncer Patients With Venous Thromboembolism or Atrial Fibrillation (VENOCAT) Pilot Study

The peri-procedural management of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in persons with cancer (PWC) undergoing tunneled or port central venous catheter (CVC) insertion is a common but understudied clinical problem, with conflicting management advice from guidelines and resultant uncertainty for best practices. Data from prospective studies assessing peri-procedural DOAC management exist; however, these data pertain to procedures in the general population. These management strategies may not be applicable to PWC because (1) although CVC insertion is a low risk, image-guided specialized procedure, (2) PWC are at considerably higher risk of peri-procedural bleeding and thrombosis than non-PWC. It is not surprising, therefore, that guideline recommendations and current practices vary widely. To resolve management uncertainty and establish a standard-of-care, the VENOCAT pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) is a first step that will assess the feasibility of a definitive trial comparing continued vs. interrupted DOAC management in PWC undergoing tunneled or port CVC insertion. Evidence is needed to standardize clinical practice and reduce the risk of bleeding and thrombotic complications.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2C4
        • University Health Network
        • Contact:
          • Jameel Abdulrehman, MD, MSc

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult patients with VTE or non-valvular AF on prophylactic or therapeutic dose DOAC
  2. Active cancer, defined as diagnosed within the past 6 months; or recurrent, regionally advanced, or metastatic cancer; or for which treatment had been administered within 6 months of port or tunneled CVC insertion; or hematologic cancer not in complete remission
  3. Pending elective radiologically guided insertion of tunneled or port CVC
  4. Able and willing to adhere to peri-procedural DOAC management plan and follow-up

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Creatinine clearance (Cockcroft-Gault equation) <30 mL/min for Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, or Edoxaban, and <25mL/min for Apixaban
  2. Diagnosis of VTE within 21 days
  3. Platelet count < 50 x 10^9/L at time of study entry
  4. Concomitant strong inhibitors or inducers to P-glycoprotein and/or CYP-3A4

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Continued DOAC

The continued DOAC group will continue their DOAC peri-procedurally as routine without interruption.

This management strategy was devised based on the cardiac device insertion studies which found continued AC to be a safe and efficacious strategy for cardiac device insertion, which is procedurally similar to tunneled or port CVC insertion. This is the peri-procedural AC strategy for tunneled or port CVC insertion suggested by the Society of Interventional Radiology guidelines.

The continued DOAC group will continue their DOAC peri-procedurally as routine without interruption.
Active Comparator: Interrupted DOAC
The interrupted DOAC group will take their last DOAC dose on Day -2, unless their DOAC is Dabigatran and their creatinine clearance is < 50mL/min (Cockcroft-Gault equation), in which their last dose will be on Day -3. The DOAC will be resumed on Day +1. This management strategy was utilized in the PAUSE study and was devised taking into account DOAC half-lives, manufacturer recommendations, and available literature. With this strategy, DOACs would be interrupted for three to four halflives, resulting in minimal residual anticoagulant effect. DOAC interruption is described by number of days rather than hours to allow for a simple pragmatic strategy that would be easy to apply in practice and follow by patients. This strategy was found to be safe and efficacious in the PAUSE and cardiac device insertion studies. This is the peri-procedural AC strategy for tunneled or port CVC insertion suggested by the ISTH.
The interrupted DOAC group will take their last DOAC dose on Day -2, unless their DOAC is Dabigatran and their creatinine clearance is < 50mL/min (Cockcroft-Gault equation), in which their last dose will be on Day -3. The DOAC will be resumed on Day +1.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recruitment rate
Time Frame: 1 year
proportion of eligible participants successfully recruited to the study and randomized to a treatment arm
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Eligibility rate
Time Frame: 1 year
proportion of screened patients who are eligible
1 year
Intervention adherence
Time Frame: 1 year
proportion of recruited participants that adhere to the assigned study intervention
1 year
DOAC level adherence
Time Frame: 1 year
proportion of recruited participants that complete DOAC level testing
1 year
Retention rate
Time Frame: 1 year
proportion of recruited participants who attend the follow-up visit
1 year
Study completion rate
Time Frame: 1 year
proportion of recruited participants who completed all study procedures appropriately
1 year
Reasons for declining participation
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinically significant bleeding
Time Frame: 30 days
composite of major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding at 30 days
30 days
Major bleeding
Time Frame: 30 days
major bleeding at 30 days
30 days
Clinically relevant non-major bleeding
Time Frame: 30 days
Clinically relevant non-major bleeding at 30 days
30 days
Recurrent venous thromboembolism
Time Frame: 30 days
Recurrent venous thromboembolism in those anticoagulated for VTE at 30 days
30 days
Arterial thrombosis
Time Frame: 30 days
Arterial thrombosis in those anticoagulated for AF at 30 days
30 days
All-cause mortality
Time Frame: 30 days
All-cause mortality at 30 days
30 days
DOAC levels
Time Frame: within 2 hours of CVC insertion
A pre-procedural DOAC level will be drawn by blood sample in all participants on Day 0, within two hours of CVC insertion
within 2 hours of CVC insertion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 13, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Clinical Trials on Continued DOAC

Subscribe