- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06890117
Non-Surgical Laser Treatment for Peri-Implantitis: Er:YAG & Diode Laser
Non-surgical Treatment of Peri-implantitis Using Combined Er: YAG (2940nm) and Diode Laser (808nm): a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Clinical, Microbiological Parameters and Metabolomics
A prospective, randomized clinical trial with a 3-month duration was designed to evaluate the efficacy of non-surgical treatment for peri-implantitis. Patients presenting at the Postgraduate Periodontology Clinic of the School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, with a diagnosis of peri-implantitis in at least one implant (based on the new classification of periodontal and peri-implant diseases, EFP 2018) will be included.
After clinical and radiographic evaluation, patients will be randomly assigned to two groups, with each patient participating in the study with one implant. The control group will receive non-surgical treatment using ultrasonic scalers designed for implants, combined with saline irrigation. The experimental group will undergo non-surgical treatment with Er:YAG (2940nm) and Diode (808nm) laser. All patients will receive oral hygiene instructions at baseline and during each subsequent visit.
Microbial plaque samples will be collected using two sterile paper cones from the deepest peri-implant pocket before treatment and three months after treatment. The presence and absolute counts of Porphyromonas gingivalis and Filifactor alocis will be assessed using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Additionally, peri-implant crevicular fluid will be collected from the second deepest peri-implant pocket using three sterile paper cones before treatment and three months post-treatment for metabolomic analysis.
Clinical parameters, including probing pocket depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BOP), clinical attachment level (CAL), peri-implant mucosal recession (REC), and suppuration (SUP), will be recorded at baseline and at the end of the experimental period (3 months). Treatment success will be evaluated at the 3-month mark, defined as a pocket depth ≤5 mm with no bleeding on probing at more than one of six implant sites and no suppuration, according to the EFP S3 level clinical practice guideline.
Additionally, patients will complete a home questionnaire to assess pain at different time points (immediately after treatment, 24, 48, and 72 hours post-treatment). Pain levels will be evaluated using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), where 0 mm indicates "no pain" and 100 mm represents "worst pain." The total number of analgesics consumed daily for one week post-treatment will also be recorded. At the end of the week, patients will answer four Yes/No/Don't Know questions to assess their satisfaction with the treatment.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
This study aims to compare the effectiveness of non-surgical peri-implantitis treatment using conventional ultrasonic debridement versus a laser-assisted approach. The primary objective is to assess clinical, microbiological, and metabolomic outcomes associated with each treatment modality.
The study will be conducted at the Postgraduate Periodontology Clinic of the School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. Participants will be screened based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, and those diagnosed with peri-implantitis in at least one implant will be randomly assigned to either the control or experimental group.
Study Procedures:
Control Group: Treatment with ultrasonic scalers designed for implants and saline irrigation.
Experimental Group: Treatment with Er:YAG (2940nm) and Diode (808nm) laser.
Oral Hygiene Instructions: Provided at baseline and each follow-up visit.
Microbiological Sampling: Collection of subgingival plaque using sterile paper cones before and after treatment (3 months), with analysis of P. gingivalis and F. alocis using qPCR.
Metabolomic Analysis: Collection of peri-implant crevicular fluid before and after treatment for metabolomic profiling.
Clinical Parameters: PPD, BOP, CAL, REC, and SUP will be recorded at baseline and after 3 months.
Pain and Patient Satisfaction: VAS pain assessment at multiple time points and tracking of analgesic consumption. A patient satisfaction questionnaire will be completed at the end of the study.
Study Outcomes:
Primary Outcome: Reduction in peri-implant pocket depth and inflammation.
Secondary Outcomes: Changes in microbiological and metabolomic markers, pain perception, and patient-reported satisfaction.
This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to provide valuable insights into the efficacy of laser-assisted non-surgical therapy for peri-implantitis compared to conventional ultrasonic debridement. The findings could contribute to the optimization of non-surgical treatment protocols for peri-implant disease management.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Thessaloniki, Greece, 54124
- Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients presenting at the Postgraduate Periodontology Clinic with a diagnosis of peri-implantitis in at least one implant, based on the 2018 Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases (EFP 2018).
- Probing pocket depth (PPD) of up to 10 mm.
- Periodontally healthy individuals (no active periodontal disease).
- Implants must have been in function (loaded) for at least one year.
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- Medically healthy individuals or those with well-controlled systemic conditions.
- Implant-supported restorations must be accessible for proper oral hygiene.
- Patients must provide signed informed consent for participation.
- Non-smokers only
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of systemic diseases or medications that could influence treatment outcomes (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, chemotherapy, immunosuppression).
- Underwent peri-implantitis treatment in the past 3 months.
- Use of antibiotics or antimicrobial therapy in the past 3 months.
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
- Smokers
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Ultrasonic Debridement + Saline Irrigation
Participants in this group will receive non-surgical mechanical debridement using ultrasonic scalers specifically designed for implant surfaces, followed by irrigation with saline solution.
No additional laser therapy will be applied.
|
Control Group: Non-surgical peri-implantitis treatment using ultrasonic scalers and EMS PI tips designed for implants, combined with saline irrigation to remove plaque and biofilm from implant surfaces.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Er:YAG + Diode Laser
Participants in this group will receive non-surgical peri-implantitis treatment using Er:YAG (2940 nm) and Diode (808 nm) lasers.
The Er:YAG laser will be used for implant surface decontamination, while the Diode laser will be applied for biostimulation.
|
Experimental Group: Non-surgical peri-implantitis treatment using Er:YAG laser (2940nm) and Diode laser (808nm) for decontamination of the implant surface and surrounding tissues.
The Er:YAG laser is used for mechanical debridement and biofilm removal, while the Diode laser has biostimulatory effects.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Probing Pocket Depth (PPD)
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post-treatment
|
Change in peri-implant probing pocket depth (PPD) from baseline to 3 months post-treatment.
PPD is measured using a periodontal probe at six sites per implant.
|
Baseline and 3 months post-treatment
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Attachment Level (CAL)
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post-treatment
|
Measurement of the distance from the implant shoulder to the base of the peri-implant pocket.
|
Baseline and 3 months post-treatment
|
|
Peri-implant Mucosal Recession (REC)
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post-treatment
|
Measurement of the vertical soft tissue recession at six implant sites.
|
Baseline and 3 months post-treatment
|
|
Presence of Suppuration (SUP)
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post-treatment
|
Assessment of purulent exudate upon probing, indicating ongoing infection.
|
Baseline and 3 months post-treatment
|
|
Treatment Success (Yes/No)
Time Frame: 3 months post-treatment
|
Defined as pocket depth ≤5 mm with no bleeding on probing at more than one of six implant sites and no suppuration, per EFP S3 guidelines.
|
3 months post-treatment
|
|
Change in P. gingivalis Levels
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post-treatment
|
Quantification of Porphyromonas gingivalis using qPCR from subgingival plaque samples.
|
Baseline and 3 months post-treatment
|
|
Change in F. alocis Levels
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post-treatment
|
Quantification of Filifactor alocis using qPCR from subgingival plaque samples.
|
Baseline and 3 months post-treatment
|
|
Metabolomic Profile Changes
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post-treatment
|
Analysis of peri-implant crevicular fluid metabolites to assess biochemical changes post-treatment.
|
Baseline and 3 months post-treatment
|
|
Analgesic Consumption
Time Frame: Daily for 7 days post-treatment
|
Total number of analgesics taken by patients in the first week post-treatment.
|
Daily for 7 days post-treatment
|
|
Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: 1 week post-treatment
|
Yes/No/Don't Know questionnaire assessing patient satisfaction with treatment outcomes.
|
1 week post-treatment
|
|
Bleeding on Probing (BOP)
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post-treatment
|
Assessment of bleeding upon gentle probing at six sites per implant to evaluate inflammation.
|
Baseline and 3 months post-treatment
|
|
Pain Evaluation (VAS Scale)
Time Frame: 0, 24, 48, and 72 hours post-treatment
|
Pain assessment using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at different time points (immediately post-treatment, 24, 48, and 72 hours).
The VAS for Pain ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents no pain and 100 represents the worst possible pain.
Higher scores indicate greater pain severity.
|
0, 24, 48, and 72 hours post-treatment
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Chariklia Neofytou, MSc, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Berglundh T, Armitage G, Araujo MG, Avila-Ortiz G, Blanco J, Camargo PM, Chen S, Cochran D, Derks J, Figuero E, Hammerle CHF, Heitz-Mayfield LJA, Huynh-Ba G, Iacono V, Koo KT, Lambert F, McCauley L, Quirynen M, Renvert S, Salvi GE, Schwarz F, Tarnow D, Tomasi C, Wang HL, Zitzmann N. Peri-implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jun;45 Suppl 20:S286-S291. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12957.
- Camps-Font O, Perez-Beltran I, Fornes-Nieto V, Gonzalez-Barnadas A, Costa-Berenguer X, Garcia-Garcia M, Figueiredo R, Valmaseda-Castellon E. Patient-centered outcomes after surgical treatment of peri-implantitis: a prospective clinical study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2023 Jan 1;28(1):e72-e80. doi: 10.4317/medoral.25587.
- Grzech-Lesniak K, Sculean A, Gaspirc B. Laser reduction of specific microorganisms in the periodontal pocket using Er:YAG and Nd:YAG lasers: a randomized controlled clinical study. Lasers Med Sci. 2018 Sep;33(7):1461-1470. doi: 10.1007/s10103-018-2491-z. Epub 2018 May 15.
- Mills MP, Rosen PS, Chambrone L, Greenwell H, Kao RT, Klokkevold PR, McAllister BS, Reynolds MA, Romanos GE, Wang HL. American Academy of Periodontology best evidence consensus statement on the efficacy of laser therapy used alone or as an adjunct to non-surgical and surgical treatment of periodontitis and peri-implant diseases. J Periodontol. 2018 Jul;89(7):737-742. doi: 10.1002/JPER.17-0356. No abstract available.
- Schwarz F, Aoki A, Becker J, Sculean A. Laser application in non-surgical periodontal therapy: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Sep;35(8 Suppl):29-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01259.x.
- Schwarz F, Sculean A, Georg T, Reich E. Periodontal treatment with an Er: YAG laser compared to scaling and root planing. A controlled clinical study. J Periodontol. 2001 Mar;72(3):361-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.2001.72.3.361.
- Schwarz F, Sculean A, Rothamel D, Schwenzer K, Georg T, Becker J. Clinical evaluation of an Er:YAG laser for nonsurgical treatment of peri-implantitis: a pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Feb;16(1):44-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01051.x.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 26/29.01.2025
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Peri-Implantitis
-
University of ManitobaUnknownPeri ImplantitisCanada
-
Istanbul Medipol University HospitalAnkara University; Ankara Medipol University; Lokman Hekim UniversityCompletedPeri Implantitis | Peri-Implant Health | Peri Implant MucositisTurkey (Türkiye)
-
King Abdullah University HospitalJordan University of Science and TechnologyCompletedPeri-Implantitis and Peri-implant MucositisJordan
-
University of PittsburghRecruiting
-
Research Centre for Medical Genetics, Russian FederationCompleted
-
University of ValenciaCompletedEarly Apical Peri-implantitis
-
PolyPid Ltd.MIS Implant Technologies, LtdCompleted
-
Rambam Health Care CampusCompletedDental Implants,Peri-implantitis,SmokingIsrael
-
Recep Tayyip Erdogan UniversityNot yet recruitingPeri Implantitis | Peri Implant Mucositis
Clinical Trials on Ultrasonic Scalers with EMS PI tip and Saline Irrigation
-
Esin ÖzlekYuzuncu Yıl UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Minia UniversityUnknown
-
Minia UniversityUnknown
-
Medipol UniversityCompletedPeriapical Periodontitis | Root Canal InfectionTurkey
-
Istanbul Medeniyet UniversityCompletedNasal Congestion | NursingTurkey
-
National and Kapodistrian University of AthensEnrolling by invitationApical Periodontitis | Pulp Necrosis | Endodontic TreatmentGreece
-
Indiana UniversityAmerican Rhinologic SocietyRecruitingCystic Fibrosis (CF) | Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS)United States
-
Erasmus Medical CenterLudwig-Maximilians - University of Munich; University Medicine Greifswald; Academisch... and other collaboratorsCompletedSurgery | Strabismus | EndophthalmitisNetherlands, Germany
-
Federal University of PelotasUnknown
-
Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research HospitalUnknownGynecologic SurgeryTurkey