Povidone-iodine Antisepsis for Strabismus Surgery (PASS)

March 4, 2013 updated by: Erasmus Medical Center

Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Comparison of 5 % Against 1.25 % Povidone-iodine Solution as Preoperative Antisepsis for Strabismus Surgery in Young Children

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of 5 % vs. 1.25 % povidone-iodine (PI) as preoperative antiseptic prior to strabismus surgery in children as a prophylaxis of endophthalmitis. Given the low rate of endophthalmitis the conjunctival bacterial flora rate is used as surrogate marker to determine the effectiveness of topical PI in reducing or eliminating bacteria from the ocular surface at the time of the surgery. Secondary objective is a reduction of the incidence of postoperative endophthalmitis after strabismus surgery in young children.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: Endophthalmitis after strabismus surgery in young children leads to blindness and loss of the affected eye. It is caused by conjunctival bacteria. PI solutions between 1% and 5% reduce the number of bacteria on the conjunctiva. The concentration used varies widely among clinics, from 1% to 5%. In vitro studies have shown that PI is paradoxically more effective at lower concentration, but in cataract surgery in elderly, 1% PI has been shown to be less effective than 5% PI. Dilution by tear fluid or binding of PI to proteins in tear fluid may lower its effectiveness. Since endophthalmitis after strabismus surgery especially affects young children and the bacterial flora of the conjunctiva in children is different from that in adults, the cataract PI study should be repeated in young children operated for strabismus.

Objective: To compare the efficacy of 5 % vs. 1.25 % povidone-iodine (PI) as preoperative antiseptic prior to strabismus surgery in children as a prophylaxis of endophthalmitis. Given the low rate of endophthalmitis the conjunctival bacterial flora rate is used as surrogate marker to determine the effectiveness of topical PI in reducing or eliminating bacteria from the ocular surface at the time of the surgery.

Design: The study is a multi-centre, prospective, randomized-controlled, parallel-groups, assessor-blind (microbiological assessments), investigator-initiated trial.

Study population: All children under 6 years of age attending the 15 participating clinics for routine strabismus surgery will be eligible for the study at the point that a strabismus operation is planned. The clinics (5 Dutch, 10 German) will each recruit approximately 20 patients. The minimum sample size is 2 x 100 patients.

Intervention: Diluted PI, 1.25% or 5%, will be prepared in a sterile fashion, and distributed in single-use dispensers. These will be coded for randomization. Before initiation of surgery, children randomized to the 5% PI group will have their conjunctival fornices irrigated with 5 ml PI 5%. Children randomized to the 1.25% PI group will have their conjunctival fornices irrigated with 5 ml PI 1.25%. Conjunctiva cultures for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria will be obtained (1) after general anesthesia has been established, (2) 5-10 min after PI irrigation, (3) after reattachment of the eye muscles and (4) after closing the conjunctiva with sutures.

Primary outcome: The difference in the mean numbers of bacterial colony forming units (CFUs) from pre-irrigation (l) to post-irrigation with PI (2-4).

Secondary outcome: Iodine excretion after surgery, assessed as urine iodine concentration per creatinine clearance.

Postoperative erosion of the cornea and corneal oedema. Both of these have been described as side-effects of PI use.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation:

Risks are limited to the act of taking the four bacterial cultures, as both 1.25% PI and 5% PI are approved preoperative antiseptic applications of PI and both are used, rather indiscriminately, by the university departments of ophthalmology participating in the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Greifswald, Germany, D-17487
        • Ernst Moritz Arndt University
      • Magdeburg, Germany, D-39120
        • Universitäts-Augenklinik
      • Munich, Germany, D-80336
        • Universitäts-Augenklinik Ludwig-Maximilian University
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, NL-1007MB
        • Dept. Ophthalmology Free University Medical Center
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, NL-1105AZ
        • Dept. Ophthalmology Academical Medical Center
      • Leiden, Netherlands, NL-2300RC
        • Dept. Ophthalmology
      • Roermond, Netherlands, NL-6040AX
        • Dept. of Ophthalmology St. Laurentius Ziekenhuis
      • Rotterdam, Netherlands, NL3000CA
        • Dept. of Ophthalmology Erasmus Medical Center
      • Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3011BH
        • Rotterdam Eye Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 5 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Children attending for routine strabismus surgery are eligible for the study. Criteria for inclusion:

  1. Children < 6 years of age
  2. undergoing surgery for strabismus for the first time, including any recession and/or resection surgery of the medial and/or lateral rectus muscles.
  3. willing to take part in all aspects of the study with written informed consent on the study participation of the child provided by the parents.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any history or current condition of hypersensitivity to iodine
  2. Children on topical antibiotic within the last 30 days
  3. Children with signs of acute conjunctivitis, blepharitis, dacryocystitis or respiratory infection within the last 30 days
  4. Children with asthma or similar chronic, obstructive pulmonary disorder
  5. Insufficiently treated amblyopia, i.e. a difference between the visual acuities of both eyes larger than 1 LogMARline.
  6. Neurological or psychiatric disorder, medication, other eye disorder, decreased visual acuity caused by brain damage or trauma.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The difference in the mean numbers of bacterial colony forming units from pre-irrigation to post-irrigation with PI.
Time Frame: Cultures taken during surgery, evaluated within 2 days postoperatively
Cultures taken during surgery, evaluated within 2 days postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Iodine excretion after surgery, assessed as urine iodine concentration per creatinine clearance.
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
24 hours postoperatively
Postoperative erosion of the cornea and corneal oedema.
Time Frame: within 24 hours postoperatively
within 24 hours postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Huibert J Simonsz, MD PhD, Erasmus Medical Center
  • Principal Investigator: Herminia Miño de Kaspar, PhD, Universitäts-Augenklinik Ludwig-Maximilian University Munich Germany

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 17, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

April 18, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 5, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2013

Last Verified

July 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgery

3
Subscribe