Does Botulinum Toxin Type-A Injection an Effective Way of Relieving Pain in Myofascial Pain Syndrome Patients or Not

January 8, 2026 updated by: Taner Dandinoğlu, Bursa City Hospital

Does Botulinum Toxin Type-A an Effective Way of Relieving Pain in Myofascial Pain Syndrome or Not

In this research prilocaine and botulinum toxin (BoNT-A) interventions prospectively compared to find out the effect of BoNT-A injection on myofascial pain syndrome (MPS).

The main question it aims to answer is: Does Botulinum Toxin Type-A an Effective Way of Relieving Pain in Myofascial Pain Syndrome or not?

For this purpose thirty-eight patients randomly assigned into two study groups. While BoNT-A injection group (BIG group n=19) treated with 20 units of toxin to each trigger point (TP), remaining treated with 2 ml prilocaine (PIG group n=19) with same procedure.

Pre-treatment, 2nd and 6th weeks findings were clinically recorded.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Visual Analog Scale (VAS), 4-Point Verbal Rating Scale (VRS), Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT), Short Form-36 (SF-36) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) tools were used to evaluate findings of the research.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

38

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Age ≥ 20 years

Presence of myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) symptoms for more than 3 months

Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

Any injection to trigger points within the last 2 months

Diagnosis of fibromyalgia syndrome

Presence of significant respiratory or cardiovascular disease

Presence of psychiatric disorders that may interfere with study participation

History of shoulder or cervical spine intervention within the last year

Presence of cervical myelopathy or cervical radiculopathy

Inability to cooperate with study procedures or assessments

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Botulinum toxin injection group (BIG)
Active Comparator: Prilocaine injection group (PIG)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analog scale, 4-point verbal rating scale, Pressure pain threshold
Time Frame: Pre-treatment, 2nd and 6th week scores were recorded.

Visual analog scale (VAS) between 0 and 10 was used to measure subjective complaints of pain (0 painless-10 worst pain).

4-point verbal rating scale (VRS) was also used to evaluate the affected area covering the TP (3 Severe pain; strong verbal response, accompanied by grimacing of face, withdrawal of hand, 2 Modarate pain, complaint reported spontaneously or mostly response to asking, accompanied by behavioral changes like grimacing, 1 Mild pain, pain is expressed when questioning without behavioral responces and 0 None, no pain).

An algometry device is used to evaluate "Pressure pain threshold" (PPT) and the sensitivity that the person felt is recorded in kg.

Pre-treatment, 2nd and 6th week scores were recorded.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Baki Özdemir, MD, LHU Ankara Hospital Department of Rheumatology

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 26, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 26, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

January 26, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 21, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 28, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 9, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

The data that support the findings of this study are available from Military Medical Academy of Turkish Army but restrictions apply to the availability of these data (All patients are retired or active soldiers and their spouses) and so are not publicly available. However, under appropriate circumstances findings are available from the author upon reasonable request. If it is requested, data will be available for reviewers from Dr Taner Dandinoglu, E-mail: dandinoglu@gmail.com.

Study Data/Documents

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myofacial Pain Syndromes

Clinical Trials on Botulinum Toxin A Injection

Subscribe