CiLostAzol for pReventIon of Recurrent sTroke in Africa (CLARITY-Africa)

June 1, 2026 updated by: Bruce Ovbiagele, Northern California Institute of Research and Education
Global estimates suggest that sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) now has the highest incidence, prevalence, and worst survival outcomes of stroke. With an estimated 1.4 million stroke survivors, outcomes of stroke in SSA are abysmal with 1-month case fatality at 30% and 3-year mortality rate of 84%. Stroke survivors in Africa are at an inordinately high (and worsening) risk of adverse outcomes including recurrent stroke and cardiac events over the medium- to longterm. Given the paucity of resources in the region, testing of therapies, which are potentially highly clinically efficacious and cost-effective, while developing local stroke research capacity and contributing to the global secondary stroke prevention evidence base, is urgently needed. Cilostazol, a phosphodiesterase 3 inhibitor, has shown promising efficacy and safety mainly among an Asian population by cutting risk of major adverse cardiovascular events including stroke, in half, when added to aspirin or clopidogrel (8% vs. 4%, HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.35-0.77), with no increased risk in bleeding or serious adverse events. Cilostazol's potentially strong efficacy, presumed pleiotropic effects, and relatively low cost, make it a highly appealing agent for use in stroke-prone, low-resource settings. Therefore, the overall objective of the CiLostAzol for pReventIon of recurrent sTroke in Africa (CLARITY-AFRICA) study is to deploy a hybrid study design to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of cilostazol twice daily in reducing MACE over 24 months vs. placebo among 1100 recent stroke patients encountered at 12 hospitals in Ghana. Secondly, CLARITY-AFRICA also seeks to develop an implementation strategy for routine integration and policy adoption of cilostazol for post-stroke cardiovascular risk reduction in an under-resourced system. Given its compelling efficacy among a predominantly Asian population, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) is poised to fund a US-based clinical trial to assess the longer-term efficacy and safety of cilostazol in a study titled CiLostAzol for pReventIon of recurrent sTroke (CLARITY). The investigators are also aware that European and Australian funding agencies are considering stroke trials of cilostazol. A concurrently executed CLARITYAfrica trial would allow recruitment of a historically underrepresented and high-risk group (Africans), test a therapy that if efficacious could be affordable for broader regional implementation, permit transcontinental mentorship/collaborations, and leverage NINDS impending investment. CLARITY-AFRICA will assess implementation outcomes such as adoption, acceptability, cost, pertinent to uptake of cilostazol in Ghana to inform policy. Regardless of its outcome, findings from CLARITYAFRICA will contribute meaningful information from the African perspective to inform the formulation of guidelines for global adoption of cilostazol into routine care for secondary CVD risk prevention by international bodies such as the World Health Organization. This application will focus on the first 2 aims of CLARITY-AFRICA to conduct the trial and assess secondary outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1100

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Kumasi, Ghana
        • Kwame Nkrumah University of Science & Technology
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Above the age of 30 years; male or female (sex is a biological variable of interest)
  2. Ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA (ABCD2 score >= 6) diagnosis no greater than six months before enrollment. Ischemic strokes including lacunar, large vessel atherosclerotic, embolic stroke of undetermined source subtypes are eligible (Ischemic stroke or TIA should be confirmed by either with a cranial CT or MRI within 10 days of symptom onset)
  3. Aspirin or clopidogrel monotherapy
  4. Subjects with stroke may present with two or more of the following additional conditions: age ≥65 years, documented diabetes mellitus or previous treatment with oral hypoglycemic or insulin; documented hypertension >140/90mmHg or previous treatment with anti-hypertensive medications; Mild to moderate renal dysfunction (eGFR 60-30ml/min/1.73m2); Prior myocardial infarction
  5. Legally competent to sign informed consent or have a LARs who is able to provide consent for them
  6. In the opinion of the treating physician, patient is medically stable, capable of participating in a randomized trial, and willing and able to attend follow-up.
  7. Able to do labs at all study intervals (7 visits total)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Unable to provide a valid informed consent
  2. Contraindications to cilostazol (namely (i) hypersensitivity, (ii) active pathologic bleeding, e.g. bleeding peptic ulcer, intracranial bleeding due to reversible platelet aggregation, (iii) congestive cardiac failure.)
  3. Hemorrhagic stroke survivor within the last 2 years
  4. Use of an anticoagulant medication or indication for use of an anticoagulant (e.g. atrial fibrillation)
  5. On dual antiplatelet therapy (patients are eligible after completion of a course of dual antiplatelet therapy)
  6. Modified Rankin Scale 5
  7. Thrombocytopenia (platelet count <1000,000)
  8. Severe liver dysfunction (active hepatitis or hepatic insufficiency with Child-Pugh score B or C)
  9. Congestive heart failure, defined as NYHA Class III or above (marked limitation of physical activity)
  10. Nursing/pregnant mothers

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cilostazol Experimental Arm
Patients allocated to the experimental arm will receive 100mg of cilostazol tablets taken twice daily. To mitigate side-effects in both treatment arms, all patients will begin one tablet daily and titrate to the full dose (one tablet twice daily) after 2 weeks. Participants will stay on the full dose of cilostazol for the remainder of the study.
Patients allocated to the experimental arm will receive 100mg of cilostazol tablets taken twice daily. To mitigate side-effects in both treatment arms, all patients will begin one tablet daily and titrate to the full dose (one tablet twice daily) after 2 weeks. Participants will stay on the full dose of cilostazol for the remainder of the study.
No Intervention: Control Arm
Standard of post-stroke care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Percent of Participants with Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events
Time Frame: 36 months
36 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent of Participants with of Major and Minor bleeding
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
Percent of Participants with Recurrent stroke (Ischemic or Hemorrhagic)
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
Percent of Participants with Cardiovascular Deaths
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
Percent of Participants with All Cause Mortality
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
Neuro-QoL (Quality of Life)
Time Frame: 24 months

12 monthly

Neuro-QoL uses T-scores, which are standardized scores:

Mean (average) = 50 Standard deviation = 10

Interpreting T-scores:

Scores 0.5 - 1.0 SD worse than the mean = mild symptoms/impairment Scores 1.0 - 2.0 SD worse than the mean = moderate symptoms/impairment Scores 2.0 SD or more worse than the mean = severe symptoms/impairment

For negative domains (e.g. anxiety, depression, fatigue):

Higher = Worse

We will compare mean Neuro-QoL scores between the two arms of the study at study completion as well as proportions with mild, moderate and severe impairment.

24 months
Exploratory outcomes Montreal Cognitive Assessment
Time Frame: 24 months

6 monthly. Comparison of Slopes of MOCA scores over 24 months. Range of scores on MOCA: 0 to 30.

MOCA screening tool is used to detect mild cognitive impairment and early signs of dementia. It evaluates several cognitive domains, including:

Memory Attention Language Visuospatial skills Executive function Orientation

A score of 26 or above is considered normal. Scores below 26 may suggest cognitive impairment, depending on education level and clinical context.

24 months
Quality of Life (EQ-5D Questionnaire)
Time Frame: 24 months

The EQ-5D is a health-related quality of life questionnaire with two parts:

Descriptive system: Assesses 5 dimensions-mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression-each rated on 3 or 5 levels (from no problems to extreme problems).

Visual Analog Scale (VAS): Rates overall health from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).

Scoring:

The 5-digit health state is converted into a summary index score (range: <0 to 1), with 1 = full health.

The VAS reflects the person's self-rated health.

We will compare scores between the two arms at study completion.

24 months
Modified Rankin Score
Time Frame: 24 months

The Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) measures the degree of disability or dependence in daily activities after a stroke or other neurological injury.

Scoring:

0 - No symptoms

  1. - No significant disability; able to carry out all usual activities
  2. - Slight disability; unable to do all previous activities but able to look after own affairs
  3. - Moderate disability; needs some help but can walk unassisted
  4. - Moderately severe disability; unable to walk or attend to bodily needs without help
  5. - Severe disability; bedridden, incontinent, requires constant care
  6. - Dead
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 17, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 9, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 3, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant level data will be aggregated and maintained as de-identified to protect PHI

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Cilostazol 100 mg

Subscribe