Platelet Lysate vs Saline for Lumbosacral Radiculopathy

February 23, 2026 updated by: Regenexx, LLC

Single-Blind, Randomized, Controlled, Crossover Study of Autologous Platelet Lysate Versus Saline in Adults With Lumbosacral Radiculopathy

This is a randomized trial to evaluate and compare platelet lysate epidural injection to saline epidural injection for the treatment of lumbar radiculopathy (sciatica).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This single-center, single-blind, randomized-controlled clinical trial will enroll approximately 20 participants, randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either autologous PL (N=10) or saline (N=10) epidural injections for patients with lumbar radiculopathy.

Prior to enrollment, patients will undergo evaluation of medical history, back pain history, lumbar examination, radicular symptoms, medication use and review lumbar spine imaging.

Treatment will consist of lumbar transforaminal epidural at affected level/side. On the morning of the procedure, all patients will undergo a blood draw to maintain blinding of study condition. Patients in the active treatment group will receive an epidural injection of platelet lysate. Patients in the control group will receive an epidural injection of saline.

Patients will be blinded to study condition until the 3-month post-treatment follow-up. After completing the 3-month surveys, the patients will be unblinded. Patients that had been in the saline control group will be given the opportunity to cross-over into the active treatment group and re-start study timeline, completing follow-up surveys at 1, 2, 3- and 6- months.

The primary objective of this study is to compare the changes in patient-reported outcomes between the 2 groups (control versus treatment) for leg pain. Secondary objectives include comparing the change scores of other patient reported outcomes of back pain and function at 3-months, as well as continued evaluation of efficacy and durability up to 6-months in active treatment group. Change scores will be calculated by taking the difference between the 3-month scores and the baseline scores. Patients will complete subject-reported clinical questionnaires at pre-treatment, 1-month, 2-months, 3-months, and 6-months (6-m questionnaires only in the active treatment group).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Colorado
      • Broomfield, Colorado, United States, 80021
        • Centeno-Schultz Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Must be 18-65 years of age, inclusive, at time of signing informed consent
  2. At least moderate pain at screening using Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS)
  3. Diagnosis of lumbosacral radiculopathy (LSR) radiating to or below the knee in a single dermatomal pattern (L4, L5, or S1) with onset of clinical symptoms less than 2 year prior to screening visit
  4. Presence of one of the following: a radicular pattern (L4, L5, or S1) of sensory, reflex or strength changes
  5. Presence of persistent unilateral radicular pain. Have significant leg pain, numbness, or tingling that causes the patient to alter or change activities.
  6. LSR pain with inadequate response to conservative care (non-operative); participants must have tried at least one anti-inflammatory or analgesic medication (for at least 2 weeks at adequate doses) and at least one of the following: Physical therapy, bed rest, chiropractic manipulations, home directed lumbar and/or exercise programs.
  7. Lumbar spine MRI images are available after the onset of clinical symptoms and correlate with localization of clinical symptoms. CT is acceptable for patients with contraindication for MRI.
  8. Is independent, ambulatory, and can comply with post-treatment evaluations and visits.
  9. Voluntary signature of the IRB approved Informed Consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Untreated underlying psychological conditions (e.g. depression, chronic pain syndrome, etc.) as a contributor of pain
  2. Bleeding disorders
  3. Currently taking anticoagulant or immunosuppressive medication
  4. Evidence on MRI or CT of recent vertebral fracture or segmental instability (spondylolisthesis)
  5. Inflammatory or auto-immune based pathology (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, psoriatic arthritis, polymyalgia, polymyositis, gout, pseudogout, etc.)
  6. Co-existing hip or knee pain localized to the joint structures that may interfere with the participant's ability to participate in the study or interfere with pain assessments
  7. Any central canal stenosis with neurogenic claudication (not including foraminal stenosis) with pain present mostly during walking and signs of lumbar stenosis on lumbar spine MRI/CT
  8. Has undergone a surgical procedure for back pain (e.g. discectomy, artificial disc replacement, fusion, etc)
  9. Presence of spinal cord stimulator
  10. Received epidural steroid injection or nerve blocks within the last 2 months
  11. Use of chronic opioids
  12. Documented history of drug abuse within the last 6 months
  13. Use of immunosuppressants, oral or intravenous steroids in the last 3 months
  14. Is pregnant
  15. Allergy or intolerance to study medication (e.g. lidocaine, etc.)
  16. Condition represents a worker's comp case and/or is involved in health-related litigation
  17. Presence of clinically significant disease that may interfere with the evaluation of safety and other clinical outcomes in the study
  18. Any other condition, that in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude the patient from enrollment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Platelet Lysate
Lumbar transforaminal epidural of autologous platelet lysate
The day prior to or the morning of the procedure patient will have their blood drawn by a phlebotomist into 8 yellow top tubes and 1 purple top tube and processed into 5cc PL of which 4cc will be used for treatment and the remaining 1cc will be frozen and used for QC. A lavender top blood tube will be collected and used for quantitative CBC analysis (Beckman Coulter DxH 500 Series). Patient will lie on table prone with a pillow under their abdomen to flatten their L-spine, sterilely prepped and draped. Provider to put patient in conscious sedation to maintain study blinding. The physician will then use a 25-gauge needle under intermittent x-ray visualization to access the TF space. The physician will inject the TF space with x-ray contrast (0.5mL of OMNIPAQUE) to confirm epidural flow. Once flow is confirmed, the physician will inject 4mL of the PL, and 0.5mL of 0.5% ropivacaine into the epidural space at each level of interest. A 0.22 micron filter will be used.
Placebo Comparator: Saline
Lumbar transforaminal epidural of saline
The day prior to or the morning of the procedure patient will have their blood drawn by a phlebotomist into 8 yellow top tubes and 1 purple top tube and processed into 5cc PL of which 4cc will be used for treatment and the remaining 1cc will be frozen and used for QC. A lavender top blood tube will be collected and used for quantitative CBC analysis; same as active treatment to maintain blinding. Patient will lie on table prone with a pillow under their abdomen to flatten their L-spine, sterilely prepped and draped. Provider to put patient in conscious sedation to maintain study blinding. The physician will then use a 25-gauge needle under intermittent x-ray visualization to access the TF space. The physician will inject the TF space with x-ray contrast (0.5mL of OMNIPAQUE) to confirm epidural flow. (6) Once flow is confirmed, the physician will inject 4mL of sterile saline (0.9%), and 0.5mL of 0.5% ropivacaine into the epidural space at each level of interest.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numeric Pain Scale (NPS)-Leg
Time Frame: 3-months
Difference in Numeric Pain Scale group differences (scale 0-10, where 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain in regard to leg pain
3-months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numeric Pain Scale (NPS)-Leg
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 6-month
Changes in NPS from pre to post treatment; scale ranges from 0-10 where 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain
Baseline, 1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 6-month
Numeric Pain Scale (NPS)-Back
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 6-month
Changes in NPS from pre to post treatment; scale ranges from 0-10 where 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain
Baseline, 1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 6-month
Mean modified SANE scores
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 6-month
Average SANE scores post-treatment; scores range from 0-100 where 0=no improvement and 100=100% improved
Baseline, 1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 6-month
Functional Rating Index (FRI)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 6-month
Changes in FRI from pre to post treatment and between group differences at 3 months; scales 0-100% where 0%=no disability and 100%=very severe disability
Baseline, 1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 6-month
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 6-month
Changes in ODI from pre to post and between group differences at 3 months; scales 0-100% where 0%=no disability and 100%=very disabled.
Baseline, 1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 6-month
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Time Frame: 1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 6-month
Evaluates all aspects of patients' health and assesses if there has been an improvement or decline in clinical status (From "Very Much Improved" to "Very Much Worse")
1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 6-month
Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS)
Time Frame: Baseline
Evaluate the severity of your overall health status (From "None" to "Very Severe"
Baseline
Incidence rate of adverse events
Time Frame: 1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 6-month
Incidence of adverse events after treatment
1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 6-month
Incidence rate of surgical/other treatment interventions
Time Frame: 1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 6-month
Incidence of surgical/other treatment interventions after treatment
1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 6-month
Pain medications
Time Frame: Baseline and 3-months
Changes in medications from pre to post treatment
Baseline and 3-months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 5, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

November 5, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 4, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 25, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lumbar Radiculopathy

Clinical Trials on Platelet lysate

Subscribe