- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06928857
Study on the Effects of an EMG-controlled Functional Electrical Stimulator for Upper Limb for Post-stroke Patients
Pilot Study on the Effects Induced by an Electromyographic-controlled Functional Electrical Stimulator (FitFES) for Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Post-stroke Patients
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
FitFES is a wearable and non-invasive device that provides continuous stimulation set according to the residual myoelectric activity of hemiparetic muscles. Its bioinspired functioning has been implemented to restore the neurophysiological feedback from the muscles to the central nervous system while performing voluntary movements. This study aims to assess the effects of FitFES device on upper limb motor rehabilitation of post-stroke subjects, compared to traditional rehabilitation treatment. 50 post-stroke subjects will be recruited and randomized into an experimental group and a control group.
All participants will follow a 15-session rehabilitation program, and in each session they will execute task-oriented exercises. The experimental group will be assisted by the FitFES device, while the control group will perform the tasks without the device support.
Each subject will be assessed before and at the end of the rehabilitation protocol. Collected data from both groups will then be compared.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Alessandro Viganò, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: 00390240308890
- Email: avigano@dongnocchi.it
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Gaia Bailo, Eng
- Phone Number: 00390240308234
- Email: gbailo@dongnocchi.it
Study Locations
-
-
-
Genova, Italy, 16132
- Recruiting
- Ospedale Policlinico San Martino
-
Contact:
- Carlo Trompetto, MD, Professor
- Phone Number: 003901055556
- Email: ctrompetto@neurologia.unige.it
-
Contact:
- Carlo Trompetto, Professor
-
La Spezia, Italy, 19125
- Recruiting
- Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus
-
Contact:
- Pietro Balbi, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: 003901875451142
- Email: pbalbi@dongnocchi.it
-
Milano, Italy, 20148
- Recruiting
- IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS
-
Contact:
- Alessandro Viganò
-
Contact:
- Alessandro Viganò, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: 00390240308890
- Email: avigano@dongnocchi.it
-
Contact:
- Gaia Bailo, Eng
- Phone Number: 00390240308234
- Email: gbailo@dongnocchi.it
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years or older
- Diagnosis of first ischemic or hemorrhagic unilateral stroke for at least two weeks
- Medical Research Council score for at least one upper limb muscle greater than 0 and less than 5 (excluding extremes).
- Signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Score at the Mini Mental State Examination (adjusted for age and schooling) < 24
- Clinical evidence in the case of visual disturbance, ideomotor apraxia, behavioral disorders, neglect, sensory, visual and auditory disturbances of severe degree or otherwise that prevent use of the device
- Major head trauma
- Cardio-respiratory or internal clinical instability
- State of pregnancy or lactation
- Severe spasticity (Ashworth > 3)
- Skin integrity problems at the interface surface with the device
- Implanted electronic devices
- Epilepsy not medically controlled
- Severe peripheral neuropathy
- Recent interventions
- Thrombosis, thrombophlebitis
- Active stent carrier less than six months
- Severe forms of arteriosclerosis, arterial circulatory disorders
- Hypertension not treated
- Cardiac arrhythmias
- Hemorrhagic disorders (hemophilia)
- Severe forms of diabetes mellitus
- Known allergy to materials making up the device or its applied parts
- Cancer or tumour disease
- Acute arthritis
- Other neurological diseases other than stroke
- Progressive muscular dystrophy
- Abdominal or inguinal hernias
- Undiagnosed back pain
- Diseases of internal organs
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: FES group
Subjects will use the device as need-based support to perform task-oriented exercises
|
Each subject will receive 15 individual rehabilitation sessions, each lasting 60 minutes, conducted 3 to 5 times per week over a period of 5 to 3 weeks, depending on the weekly frequency.
Each participant will perform task-oriented exercises while using the FitFES device.
|
|
Active Comparator: CON group
Subjects will perform task-oriented exercises without the support of the device
|
Each subject will receive 15 individual rehabilitation sessions, each lasting 60 minutes, conducted 3 to 5 times per week over a period of 5 to 3 weeks, depending on the weekly frequency.
Each participant will perform task-oriented exercises.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), after 15 rehabilitation sessions (each session is 60 minutes) from 3 to 5 weeks after T0 (T1), 1-month follow-up (T2)
|
The ARAT test assesses upper limb functioning through the execution of 19 tasks, divided in 4 sub-tests (grasp, grip, pinch, and gross arm movement).
Each movement is scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no movement, 1=movement partially performed, 2=movement completed but takes abnormally long; 3=movement performed normally).
Total possible score is 57 points, with higher scores associated to best motor functioning.
|
Baseline (T0), after 15 rehabilitation sessions (each session is 60 minutes) from 3 to 5 weeks after T0 (T1), 1-month follow-up (T2)
|
|
Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity scale (FM-UE)
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), after 15 rehabilitation sessions (each session is 60 minutes) from 3 to 5 weeks after T0 (T1), 1-month follow-up (T2)
|
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke is one of the most widely used measures of motor impairment in post-stroke hemiplegic patients, covering 5 domains (Motor fu ENnction, sensory function, balance, joint range of motion, joint pain).
The assessment of upper extremity motion is performed using the Upper Extremity assessment (FM-UE), including items scored on a 3-point ordinal scale (0: cannot perform, 1: performs partially; 2: performs fully) with a total maximum score: 66 points (higher scores, best clinical profile).
|
Baseline (T0), after 15 rehabilitation sessions (each session is 60 minutes) from 3 to 5 weeks after T0 (T1), 1-month follow-up (T2)
|
|
Box and Block test (BBT)
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), after 15 rehabilitation sessions (each session is 60 minutes) from 3 to 5 weeks after T0 (T1), 1-month follow-up (T2)
|
The Box and Block Test (BBT) measures unilateral gross manual dexterity.
The BBT goal is to move, one by one, the maximum number of blocks from one compartment of a box to another of equal size, within 60 seconds.
The score is determined by counting the number of blocks carried over the partition from one compartment to the other during the one-minute trial period.
Higher scores on the test indicate better gross manual dexterity
|
Baseline (T0), after 15 rehabilitation sessions (each session is 60 minutes) from 3 to 5 weeks after T0 (T1), 1-month follow-up (T2)
|
|
EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), after 15 rehabilitation sessions (each session is 60 minutes) from 3 to 5 weeks after T0 (T1), 1-month follow-up (T2)
|
EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal.
Applicable to a wide range of health conditions and treatments, the EQ-5D health questionnaire provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value for health status.
It measures the 5 dimensions of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression.
Each dimension is scored on a Likert scale of 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems.
|
Baseline (T0), after 15 rehabilitation sessions (each session is 60 minutes) from 3 to 5 weeks after T0 (T1), 1-month follow-up (T2)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Surface Electromyography (EMGs)
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), after 15 rehabilitation sessions (each session is 60 minutes) from 3 to 5 weeks after T0 (T1), 1-month follow-up (T2)
|
Surface Electromyography (EMGs) is a non-invasive tool able to assess muscular electrical activity during the execution of active movements using electrodes applied on the skin surface.
Muscular contraction amplitude will be recorded from 24 sensors placed on upper limbs (12 sensors/limb), during the execution of motor acts.
Then, the difference between patient's and observed model's temporal dynamic of muscular contraction will be chosen as EMG outcome.
|
Baseline (T0), after 15 rehabilitation sessions (each session is 60 minutes) from 3 to 5 weeks after T0 (T1), 1-month follow-up (T2)
|
|
Body Kinematics
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), after 15 rehabilitation sessions (each session is 60 minutes) from 3 to 5 weeks after T0 (T1)
|
Kinematics of the upper limb and trunk will be recorded using a 9-camera optoelectronic system during 3D motor acts. The system will measure the 3D coordinates of spherical markers attached to body landmarks to compute trunk, shoulder, elbow and wrist angles. Data processing will provide measures of deviations from physiological movement. |
Baseline (T0), after 15 rehabilitation sessions (each session is 60 minutes) from 3 to 5 weeks after T0 (T1)
|
|
Treatment Safety
Time Frame: After 15 rehabilitation sessions (each session is 60 minutes) from 3 to 5 weeks after baseline (T1)
|
Data related to the safety of the device will be collected:
|
After 15 rehabilitation sessions (each session is 60 minutes) from 3 to 5 weeks after baseline (T1)
|
|
Cost-effectiveness ratio
Time Frame: At the end of 15 rehabilitation sessions (each session is 60 minutes) from 3 to 5 weeks after baseline (T1)
|
The costs of the two rehabilitation paths (with and without device), related to direct costs (maintenance device, consumables) and indirect costs will be collected (training of therapists on the device, costs related to the patient using the device).
Procedures to be performed in a single treatment session will also be evaluated, in terms of time needed for preparation and dressing, and of trained personnel required during a session.
An estimate of the working cycles that the device can perform in a year will also be considered.
|
At the end of 15 rehabilitation sessions (each session is 60 minutes) from 3 to 5 weeks after baseline (T1)
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Age data
Time Frame: Baseline (T0)
|
Age of participants will be collected
|
Baseline (T0)
|
|
Gender data
Time Frame: Baseline (T0)
|
Gender of participants will be collected
|
Baseline (T0)
|
|
Scholarity data
Time Frame: Baseline (T0)
|
Scholarity of participants will be collected
|
Baseline (T0)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Maurizio Ferrarin, PhD, Eng, IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13-31.
- Whitehead AL, Julious SA, Cooper CL, Campbell MJ. Estimating the sample size for a pilot randomised trial to minimise the overall trial sample size for the external pilot and main trial for a continuous outcome variable. Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Jun;25(3):1057-73. doi: 10.1177/0962280215588241. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
- Mehrholz J, Pohl M, Platz T, Kugler J, Elsner B. Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 7;2015(11):CD006876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006876.pub4.
- Chen HM, Chen CC, Hsueh IP, Huang SL, Hsieh CL. Test-retest reproducibility and smallest real difference of 5 hand function tests in patients with stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Jun;23(5):435-40. doi: 10.1177/1545968308331146. Epub 2009 Mar 4.
- Roh J, Rymer WZ, Perreault EJ, Yoo SB, Beer RF. Alterations in upper limb muscle synergy structure in chronic stroke survivors. J Neurophysiol. 2013 Feb;109(3):768-81. doi: 10.1152/jn.00670.2012. Epub 2012 Nov 14.
- Van der Lee JH, De Groot V, Beckerman H, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM. The intra- and interrater reliability of the action research arm test: a practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Jan;82(1):14-9. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.18668.
- van der Lee JH, Beckerman H, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM. The responsiveness of the Action Research Arm test and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale in chronic stroke patients. J Rehabil Med. 2001 Mar;33(3):110-3. doi: 10.1080/165019701750165916.
- Alt Murphy M, Resteghini C, Feys P, Lamers I. An overview of systematic reviews on upper extremity outcome measures after stroke. BMC Neurol. 2015 Mar 11;15:29. doi: 10.1186/s12883-015-0292-6.
- Feng YS, Kohlmann T, Janssen MF, Buchholz I. Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L: a systematic review of the literature. Qual Life Res. 2021 Mar;30(3):647-673. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02688-y. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
- Dorman PJ, Waddell F, Slattery J, Dennis M, Sandercock P. Is the EuroQol a valid measure of health-related quality of life after stroke? Stroke. 1997 Oct;28(10):1876-82. doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.10.1876.
- Golicki D, Niewada M, Buczek J, Karlinska A, Kobayashi A, Janssen MF, Pickard AS. Validity of EQ-5D-5L in stroke. Qual Life Res. 2015 Apr;24(4):845-50. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0834-1. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
- Page SJ, Fulk GD, Boyne P. Clinically important differences for the upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer Scale in people with minimal to moderate impairment due to chronic stroke. Phys Ther. 2012 Jun;92(6):791-8. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110009. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
- Carpinella I, Mazzoleni P, Rabuffetti M, Thorsen R, Ferrarin M. Experimental protocol for the kinematic analysis of the hand: definition and repeatability. Gait Posture. 2006 Jun;23(4):445-54. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.05.001. Epub 2005 Jun 22.
- Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, Bates B, Cherney LR, Cramer SC, Deruyter F, Eng JJ, Fisher B, Harvey RL, Lang CE, MacKay-Lyons M, Ottenbacher KJ, Pugh S, Reeves MJ, Richards LG, Stiers W, Zorowitz RD; American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016 Jun;47(6):e98-e169. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000098. Epub 2016 May 4. Erratum In: Stroke. 2017 Feb;48(2):e78. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000120. Stroke. 2017 Dec;48(12):e369. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000156.
- Perini G, Bertoni R, Thorsen R, Carpinella I, Lencioni T, Ferrarin M, Jonsdottir J. Sequentially applied myoelectrically controlled FES in a task-oriented approach and robotic therapy for the recovery of upper limb in post-stroke patients: A randomized controlled pilot study. Technol Health Care. 2021;29(3):419-429. doi: 10.3233/THC-202371.
- Jonsdottir J, Thorsen R, Aprile I, Galeri S, Spannocchi G, Beghi E, Bianchi E, Montesano A, Ferrarin M. Arm rehabilitation in post stroke subjects: A randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of myoelectrically driven FES applied in a task-oriented approach. PLoS One. 2017 Dec 4;12(12):e0188642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188642. eCollection 2017.
- Wafa HA, Wolfe CDA, Emmett E, Roth GA, Johnson CO, Wang Y. Burden of Stroke in Europe: Thirty-Year Projections of Incidence, Prevalence, Deaths, and Disability-Adjusted Life Years. Stroke. 2020 Aug;51(8):2418-2427. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.029606. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
- Li L, Scott CA, Rothwell PM. Association of Younger vs Older Ages With Changes in Incidence of Stroke and Other Vascular Events, 2002-2018. JAMA. 2022 Aug 9;328(6):563-574. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.12759.
- Villepinte C, Verma A, Dimeglio C, De Boissezon X, Gasq D. Responsiveness of kinematic and clinical measures of upper-limb motor function after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2021 Mar;64(2):101366. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2020.02.005. Epub 2020 Mar 7.
- de los Reyes-Guzman A, Dimbwadyo-Terrer I, Trincado-Alonso F, Monasterio-Huelin F, Torricelli D, Gil-Agudo A. Quantitative assessment based on kinematic measures of functional impairments during upper extremity movements: A review. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2014 Aug;29(7):719-27. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.06.013. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
- Tropea P, Monaco V, Coscia M, Posteraro F, Micera S. Effects of early and intensive neuro-rehabilitative treatment on muscle synergies in acute post-stroke patients: a pilot study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2013 Oct 5;10:103. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-10-103.
- Yang N, An Q, Kogami H, Yamakawa H, Tamura Y, Takahashi K, Kinomoto M, Yamasaki H, Itkonen M, Shibata-Alnajjar F, Shimoda S, Hattori N, Fujii T, Otomune H, Miyai I, Yamashita A, Asama H. Temporal Features of Muscle Synergies in Sit-to-Stand Motion Reflect the Motor Impairment of Post-Stroke Patients. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2019 Oct;27(10):2118-2127. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2939193. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
- Overduin SA, d'Avella A, Roh J, Carmena JM, Bizzi E. Representation of Muscle Synergies in the Primate Brain. J Neurosci. 2015 Sep 16;35(37):12615-24. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4302-14.2015.
- Crow JL, Kwakkel G, Bussmann JB, Goos JA, Harmeling-van der Wel BC; Early Prediction of Functional Outcome After Stroke (EPOS) Investigators. Are the hierarchical properties of the Fugl-Meyer assessment scale the same in acute stroke and chronic stroke? Phys Ther. 2014 Jul;94(7):977-86. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130170. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
- Burton Q, Lejeune T, Dehem S, Lebrun N, Ajana K, Edwards MG, Everard G. Performing a shortened version of the Action Research Arm Test in immersive virtual reality to assess post-stroke upper limb activity. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022 Dec 3;19(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12984-022-01114-3.
- van der Lee JH, Roorda LD, Beckerman H, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM. Improving the Action Research Arm test: a unidimensional hierarchical scale. Clin Rehabil. 2002 Sep;16(6):646-53. doi: 10.1191/0269215502cr534oa.
- Thorsen R, Cortesi M, Jonsdottir J, Carpinella I, Morelli D, Casiraghi A, Puglia M, Diverio M, Ferrarin M. Myoelectrically driven functional electrical stimulation may increase motor recovery of upper limb in poststroke subjects: a randomized controlled pilot study. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(6):785-94. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2012.07.0123.
- Crepaldi M, Thorsen R, Jonsdottir J, Scarpetta S, De Michieli L, Salvo MD, Zini G, Laffranchi M, Ferrarin M. FITFES: A Wearable Myoelectrically Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulator Designed Using a User-Centered Approach. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2021;29:2142-2152. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2021.3120293. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
- Eraifej J, Clark W, France B, Desando S, Moore D. Effectiveness of upper limb functional electrical stimulation after stroke for the improvement of activities of daily living and motor function: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 28;6(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0435-5.
- Bernhardt J, Hayward KS, Kwakkel G, Ward NS, Wolf SL, Borschmann K, Krakauer JW, Boyd LA, Carmichael ST, Corbett D, Cramer SC. Agreed definitions and a shared vision for new standards in stroke recovery research: The Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable taskforce. Int J Stroke. 2017 Jul;12(5):444-450. doi: 10.1177/1747493017711816.
- Raghavan P. Upper Limb Motor Impairment After Stroke. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2015 Nov;26(4):599-610. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2015.06.008. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- RAISE-FITFES-RCT
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Stroke
-
University of PittsburghRecruitingHemorrhagic Stroke | Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source | Ischemic Stroke, Cryptogenic | Recurrent Ischemic Stroke | Ischemic Stroke, EmbolicUnited States
-
National Assembly ClinicBayero University Kano, NigeriaRecruitingStroke | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke Ischemic | Hemiparesis After StrokeNigeria
-
Mahidol UniversityNot yet recruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke SurvivorsThailand
-
Mahidol UniversityRecruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke PatientThailand
-
University Hospital, GhentRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicBelgium
-
Moleac Pte Ltd.Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke, Cardiovascular | Strokes Thrombotic | Stroke, Embolic | Stroke, Cryptogenic
-
University of Illinois at ChicagoRecruitingStroke, Ischemic | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke, CerebrovascularUnited States
-
IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, ItalyRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicItaly
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusScuola Superiore Sant'Anna di Pisa; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus...Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Upper Limb Rehabilitation | Stroke IschemicItaly
-
Samsung Medical CenterCompletedChronic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | ExoskeletonSouth Korea
Clinical Trials on EMG-based FES rehabilitation
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusIstituto Italiano di TecnologiaCompletedStroke | Healthy Health Care ProfessionalsItaly
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusFondazione Italiana Sclerosi MultiplaNot yet recruiting
-
Ohio State UniversityUnited States Department of Defense; Congressionally Directed Medical Research... and other collaboratorsCompletedCervical Spinal Cord InjuryUnited States
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusRecruitingCritical Illness Myopathy | Critical Illness PolyneuropathyItaly
-
Battelle Memorial InstituteCompleted
-
Delta University for Science and TechnologyCompleted
-
Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education...CompletedSpinal Cord InjuriesTurkey (Türkiye)
-
University of FoggiaNot yet recruitingStroke | Post-Stroke Hemiparesis | Post-Stroke SpasticityItaly
-
Chang Gung UniversityMackay Memorial Hospital; Chang Gung Memorial HospitalCompleted
-
Universita degli Studi di GenovaCompleted