Study on the Effects of an EMG-controlled Functional Electrical Stimulator for Upper Limb for Post-stroke Patients

April 14, 2025 updated by: Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus

Pilot Study on the Effects Induced by an Electromyographic-controlled Functional Electrical Stimulator (FitFES) for Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Post-stroke Patients

Upper limb disabilities are among the most debilitating issues after a cerebral stroke. One promising approach in motor rehabilitation is the use of functional electrical stimulation (FES). This technique can be integrated into daily therapy to follow an adaptive approach, exploiting the residual capacities of patients. FES can help to stimulate the affected muscles, improve coordination and strengthen the weakened muscles, thus supporting the rehabilitation process.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

FitFES is a wearable and non-invasive device that provides continuous stimulation set according to the residual myoelectric activity of hemiparetic muscles. Its bioinspired functioning has been implemented to restore the neurophysiological feedback from the muscles to the central nervous system while performing voluntary movements. This study aims to assess the effects of FitFES device on upper limb motor rehabilitation of post-stroke subjects, compared to traditional rehabilitation treatment. 50 post-stroke subjects will be recruited and randomized into an experimental group and a control group.

All participants will follow a 15-session rehabilitation program, and in each session they will execute task-oriented exercises. The experimental group will be assisted by the FitFES device, while the control group will perform the tasks without the device support.

Each subject will be assessed before and at the end of the rehabilitation protocol. Collected data from both groups will then be compared.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Genova, Italy, 16132
        • Recruiting
        • Ospedale Policlinico San Martino
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Carlo Trompetto, Professor
      • La Spezia, Italy, 19125
        • Recruiting
        • Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus
        • Contact:
      • Milano, Italy, 20148
        • Recruiting
        • IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS
        • Contact:
          • Alessandro Viganò
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years or older
  • Diagnosis of first ischemic or hemorrhagic unilateral stroke for at least two weeks
  • Medical Research Council score for at least one upper limb muscle greater than 0 and less than 5 (excluding extremes).
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Score at the Mini Mental State Examination (adjusted for age and schooling) < 24
  • Clinical evidence in the case of visual disturbance, ideomotor apraxia, behavioral disorders, neglect, sensory, visual and auditory disturbances of severe degree or otherwise that prevent use of the device
  • Major head trauma
  • Cardio-respiratory or internal clinical instability
  • State of pregnancy or lactation
  • Severe spasticity (Ashworth > 3)
  • Skin integrity problems at the interface surface with the device
  • Implanted electronic devices
  • Epilepsy not medically controlled
  • Severe peripheral neuropathy
  • Recent interventions
  • Thrombosis, thrombophlebitis
  • Active stent carrier less than six months
  • Severe forms of arteriosclerosis, arterial circulatory disorders
  • Hypertension not treated
  • Cardiac arrhythmias
  • Hemorrhagic disorders (hemophilia)
  • Severe forms of diabetes mellitus
  • Known allergy to materials making up the device or its applied parts
  • Cancer or tumour disease
  • Acute arthritis
  • Other neurological diseases other than stroke
  • Progressive muscular dystrophy
  • Abdominal or inguinal hernias
  • Undiagnosed back pain
  • Diseases of internal organs

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: FES group
Subjects will use the device as need-based support to perform task-oriented exercises
Each subject will receive 15 individual rehabilitation sessions, each lasting 60 minutes, conducted 3 to 5 times per week over a period of 5 to 3 weeks, depending on the weekly frequency. Each participant will perform task-oriented exercises while using the FitFES device.
Active Comparator: CON group
Subjects will perform task-oriented exercises without the support of the device
Each subject will receive 15 individual rehabilitation sessions, each lasting 60 minutes, conducted 3 to 5 times per week over a period of 5 to 3 weeks, depending on the weekly frequency. Each participant will perform task-oriented exercises.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), after 15 rehabilitation sessions (each session is 60 minutes) from 3 to 5 weeks after T0 (T1), 1-month follow-up (T2)
The ARAT test assesses upper limb functioning through the execution of 19 tasks, divided in 4 sub-tests (grasp, grip, pinch, and gross arm movement). Each movement is scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no movement, 1=movement partially performed, 2=movement completed but takes abnormally long; 3=movement performed normally). Total possible score is 57 points, with higher scores associated to best motor functioning.
Baseline (T0), after 15 rehabilitation sessions (each session is 60 minutes) from 3 to 5 weeks after T0 (T1), 1-month follow-up (T2)
Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity scale (FM-UE)
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), after 15 rehabilitation sessions (each session is 60 minutes) from 3 to 5 weeks after T0 (T1), 1-month follow-up (T2)
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke is one of the most widely used measures of motor impairment in post-stroke hemiplegic patients, covering 5 domains (Motor fu ENnction, sensory function, balance, joint range of motion, joint pain). The assessment of upper extremity motion is performed using the Upper Extremity assessment (FM-UE), including items scored on a 3-point ordinal scale (0: cannot perform, 1: performs partially; 2: performs fully) with a total maximum score: 66 points (higher scores, best clinical profile).
Baseline (T0), after 15 rehabilitation sessions (each session is 60 minutes) from 3 to 5 weeks after T0 (T1), 1-month follow-up (T2)
Box and Block test (BBT)
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), after 15 rehabilitation sessions (each session is 60 minutes) from 3 to 5 weeks after T0 (T1), 1-month follow-up (T2)
The Box and Block Test (BBT) measures unilateral gross manual dexterity. The BBT goal is to move, one by one, the maximum number of blocks from one compartment of a box to another of equal size, within 60 seconds. The score is determined by counting the number of blocks carried over the partition from one compartment to the other during the one-minute trial period. Higher scores on the test indicate better gross manual dexterity
Baseline (T0), after 15 rehabilitation sessions (each session is 60 minutes) from 3 to 5 weeks after T0 (T1), 1-month follow-up (T2)
EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), after 15 rehabilitation sessions (each session is 60 minutes) from 3 to 5 weeks after T0 (T1), 1-month follow-up (T2)
EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal. Applicable to a wide range of health conditions and treatments, the EQ-5D health questionnaire provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value for health status. It measures the 5 dimensions of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. Each dimension is scored on a Likert scale of 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems.
Baseline (T0), after 15 rehabilitation sessions (each session is 60 minutes) from 3 to 5 weeks after T0 (T1), 1-month follow-up (T2)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Surface Electromyography (EMGs)
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), after 15 rehabilitation sessions (each session is 60 minutes) from 3 to 5 weeks after T0 (T1), 1-month follow-up (T2)
Surface Electromyography (EMGs) is a non-invasive tool able to assess muscular electrical activity during the execution of active movements using electrodes applied on the skin surface. Muscular contraction amplitude will be recorded from 24 sensors placed on upper limbs (12 sensors/limb), during the execution of motor acts. Then, the difference between patient's and observed model's temporal dynamic of muscular contraction will be chosen as EMG outcome.
Baseline (T0), after 15 rehabilitation sessions (each session is 60 minutes) from 3 to 5 weeks after T0 (T1), 1-month follow-up (T2)
Body Kinematics
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), after 15 rehabilitation sessions (each session is 60 minutes) from 3 to 5 weeks after T0 (T1)

Kinematics of the upper limb and trunk will be recorded using a 9-camera optoelectronic system during 3D motor acts. The system will measure the 3D coordinates of spherical markers attached to body landmarks to compute trunk, shoulder, elbow and wrist angles.

Data processing will provide measures of deviations from physiological movement.

Baseline (T0), after 15 rehabilitation sessions (each session is 60 minutes) from 3 to 5 weeks after T0 (T1)
Treatment Safety
Time Frame: After 15 rehabilitation sessions (each session is 60 minutes) from 3 to 5 weeks after baseline (T1)

Data related to the safety of the device will be collected:

  1. Number of adverse events
  2. Number of drop-out related to patient intolerance to the device
After 15 rehabilitation sessions (each session is 60 minutes) from 3 to 5 weeks after baseline (T1)
Cost-effectiveness ratio
Time Frame: At the end of 15 rehabilitation sessions (each session is 60 minutes) from 3 to 5 weeks after baseline (T1)
The costs of the two rehabilitation paths (with and without device), related to direct costs (maintenance device, consumables) and indirect costs will be collected (training of therapists on the device, costs related to the patient using the device). Procedures to be performed in a single treatment session will also be evaluated, in terms of time needed for preparation and dressing, and of trained personnel required during a session. An estimate of the working cycles that the device can perform in a year will also be considered.
At the end of 15 rehabilitation sessions (each session is 60 minutes) from 3 to 5 weeks after baseline (T1)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Age data
Time Frame: Baseline (T0)
Age of participants will be collected
Baseline (T0)
Gender data
Time Frame: Baseline (T0)
Gender of participants will be collected
Baseline (T0)
Scholarity data
Time Frame: Baseline (T0)
Scholarity of participants will be collected
Baseline (T0)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Maurizio Ferrarin, PhD, Eng, IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 3, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 29, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 15, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 15, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Shared data will comprise only IPD used in results publication. Data will be available upon reasonable request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available after publication with no end date

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Request should be addressed to the principal investigator or the corresponding author of the publication.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on EMG-based FES rehabilitation

Subscribe