Cancer-related Fatigue and Symptom Clusters - Effects of Virtual, Imagined and Real-life Nature-based Therapy in Cancer Survivors (FOREST)

September 16, 2025 updated by: Marcela Winkler, MD, Robert Bosch Gesellschaft für Medizinische Forschung mbH (RBMF)

Cancer-related Fatigue and Symptom Clusters - Effects of Virtual, Imagined and Real-life Nature-based Therapy in Cancer Survivors - a RCT

This is a randomized, controlled, bicenter trial comparing the effects on symptoms and quality of life in cancer survivors. Three nature-based therapies will be compared with a wait-list group. The therapies are: virtual reality simulated forest, guided imaging and classic forest bathing. Each intervention lasts 30 minutes and takes place once a week for 8 weeks. All interventions involve different stimulus types: visual, olfactory, auditory and tactile.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

172

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Baden-Wurttemberg
      • Stuttgart, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany, 70439
        • Dr med. Marcela Winkler
    • Bavaria
      • Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany, 97080
        • PD Dr. Claudia Löffler

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have completed treatment for cancer (*with the exception of long-term adjuvant endocrine therapy).
  • Subjective Impairment due to Cancer-Related Fatigue (CrF) . NCCN-recommended questions are used for screening ("How exhausted do you feel on a scale of 0 to 10?" and "How impaired do you feel by this fatigue on a scale of 0 to 10?" (threshold >4 on either scale).
  • At the time of study inclusion, it must be expected that no further antitumor therapy measures will be started within the next 6 months.
  • Patients must be able to refrain from smoking up to 15 minutes before the intervention (smoking within 15 minutes before therapy impairs the participant's ability to perceive the aroma of the phytoncides).
  • Written and valid informed consent from the patient.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of inadequately controlled major depression in the opinion of the investigator.
  • Asthma (inhaled phytoncides may cause airway irritation, exacerbation of asthma, or bronchoconstriction).
  • Known allergy to pine or citrus fragrance.
  • Anosmie.
  • Medical history of seasickness (virtual reality can cause nausea/vomiting with no improvement after 5-10 minutes).
  • History of seizures (virtual reality may increase susceptibility to seizures due to the changing light in the forest video).
  • Visual and hearing impairments that are not corrected by visual or hearing aids.
  • Unwillingness to store and share personal medical data as part of the protocol.
  • Participation in another clinical trial focusing on behavioural or complementary medicine interventions.
  • Missing or incomplete consent form.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Wait-list group
Experimental: Real-life FOREST bathing
Participants will experience the elements (olfactory, acoustic and haptic) of forest bathing for 30 minutes (sitting) in a forested area. The forests have been previously selected near Stuttgart and Würzburg and are comparable to each other.
Experimental: Simulated FOREST bathing (Virtual Reality).
Using virtual reality goggles, a FOREST bathing experience will be simulated. The simulation will have elements of the classic FOREST bathing (olfatory, acoustic and haptic) and will last 30 minutes.
Experimental: Imaging FOREST bathing.
A therapist will lead an imaginative exercise in which participants will imagine a FOREST bathing. The imaginative exercise will include elements of the classic FOREST bathing (olfactory, acoustic and haptic) and will last 30 minutes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fatigue
Time Frame: 8 weeks (end of intervention)
The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) is a validated tool for the reliable measurement of fatigue in patients with cancer and other chronic diseases. The questionnaire has high internal consistency and validity and allows assessment of fatigue and its impact on quality of life and disease progression. 13 items to measure self-reported fatigue and its impact on daily activities and functions. Scores range from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating less fatigue (better outcome).
8 weeks (end of intervention)
Sleep
Time Frame: 8 weeks (end of intervention)
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) measures subjective sleep quality. The 19-item questionnaire generates seven "component" scores: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleep medications, and daytime disturbances. The sum of the scores for these seven components gives a global score. Scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating poorer sleep quality (worse outcome).
8 weeks (end of intervention)
Depression
Time Frame: 8 weeks (end of intervention)
The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is often used for the initial diagnosis of depression and for monitoring the course of the illness. The PHQ-9 consists of 9 questions that ask about the main and core symptoms of depression over the past two weeks, providing a structured and objective assessment of the severity of depression. Scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating more severe depression (worse outcome).
8 weeks (end of intervention)
Concentration
Time Frame: 8 weeks (end of intervention)
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog) is a 5-point Likert scale measure of chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairment in cancer patients. The questionnaire consists of 24 items covering four different domains: self-perceived cognitive impairment, feedback from others, perceived cognitive ability, and impact on quality of life. The assessment of these cognitive aspects indicates a relationship with objective symptoms and allows for a nuanced assessment of treatment-induced cognitive impairment. Scores range from 0 to 148, with higher scores indicating better perceived cognitive functioning (better outcome).
8 weeks (end of intervention)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fatigue
Time Frame: 8 weeks (end of intervention)
The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) is a validated tool for the reliable measurement of fatigue in patients with cancer and other chronic diseases. The questionnaire has high internal consistency and validity and allows assessment of fatigue and its impact on quality of life and disease progression. 13 items to measure self-reported fatigue and its impact on daily activities and functions. In addition to the primary outcome (overall fatigue score), this secondary outcome will focus on specific FACIT-F items related to fatigue interference in daily activities. This aims to explore functional limitations due to fatigue beyond the global score. Scores range from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating less fatigue (better outcome).
8 weeks (end of intervention)
Sleep
Time Frame: 8 weeks (end of intervention)
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) measures subjective sleep quality. The 19-item questionnaire generates seven "component" scores: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleep medications, and daytime disturbances. The sum of the scores for these seven components gives a global score. Scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worse sleep quality (worse outcome).
8 weeks (end of intervention)
Depression
Time Frame: 8 weeks (end of intervention)
The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is often used for the initial diagnosis of depression and for monitoring the course of the illness. The PHQ-9 consists of 9 questions that ask about the main and core symptoms of depression over the past two weeks, providing a structured and objective assessment of the severity of depression. Scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms (worse outcome).
8 weeks (end of intervention)
Concentration
Time Frame: 8 weeks (End of intervention)
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog) is a 5-point Likert scale measure of chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairment in cancer patients. The questionnaire consists of 24 items covering four different domains: self-perceived cognitive impairment, feedback from others, perceived cognitive ability, and impact on quality of life. The assessment of these cognitive aspects indicates a relationship with objective symptoms and allows for a nuanced assessment of treatment-induced cognitive impairment. Scores range from 0 to 148, with higher scores indicating better cognitive function (better outcome).
8 weeks (End of intervention)
Resilience
Time Frame: 8 weeks (end of intervention)
The Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) is a instrument used to measure resilience, or an individual's ability to bounce back quickly from stress, adversity, or challenge. The BRS is known for its brevity and conciseness, with only a few items rated on a Likert scale. Scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater resilience (better outcome).
8 weeks (end of intervention)
Mindfulness
Time Frame: 8 weeks (end of intervention)
The Mindfulness Awareness Scale (MAAS) measures a person's level of mindfulness. The scale ranges from 1 to 6 and includes a total of 15 items. The items assess the extent to which a person invests his or her thoughts in the present moment by taking into account the extent to which he or she is aware of what is going on in his or her environment at any given moment. Scores range from 15 to 90, with higher scores indicating greater mindfulness (better outcome).
8 weeks (end of intervention)
Anxiety
Time Frame: 8 weeks (end of intervention)
The Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) is a standardized screening questionnaire used to assess the severity of generalized anxiety disorder. It is used in both clinical practice and research to rapidly identify and assess the severity of anxiety symptoms. The questionnaire consists of 7 items that ask about typical symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder and focus on the last two weeks. Scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety (worse outcome)
8 weeks (end of intervention)
Quality of life Questionnaire
Time Frame: 8 weeks (end of intervention)
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - (FACT-G) Quality of Life Questionnaire. The FACT-G was developed through a structured process to identify relevant content for a cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire. The instrument allows the calculation of a generic total quality of life scale (FACT-G) as well as subscales for physical, social, emotional, and functional quality of life. Scores range from 0 to 108, with higher scores indicating better quality of life (better outcome).
8 weeks (end of intervention)
Sensation of stress
Time Frame: 8 weeks (end of intervention)
The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is the most frequently used psychological instrument for measuring the perception of stress. It measures the degree to which situations in a person's life are perceived as stressful. The scale also includes a series of direct questions about the current experience of stress. The items are easy to understand and the response alternatives are easy to record. The questionnaire consists of 10 items. Scores range from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater perceived stress (worse outcome).
8 weeks (end of intervention)
Simulator Disease (Virtual reality group only, arm 2)
Time Frame: 8 weeks (end of intervention)

The Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) is a standardised instrument designed to assess symptoms of simulator or motion sickness commonly experienced when using virtual reality (VR) and other simulated environments. The instrument consists of a series of questions divided into three subscales: Nausea, Disorientation and Oculomotor Stress.

The SSQ is widely used in VR research as it provides a means of quantifying symptoms and assessing their severity. Studies have shown that the SSQ is valid and reliable and has a high correlation with actual experienced symptoms. The results of the SSQ can be used to optimise VR experiences and improve usability. Total scores range from 0 to 235.62, with higher scores indicating greater simulator sickness (worse outcome).

8 weeks (end of intervention)
Physical Activity and Sport Questionnaire
Time Frame: 8 weeks (end of intervention)
Physical activity will be assessed using the Physical Activity and Sport Questionnaire (BSA), which records the frequency and type of physical activity in the past 4 weeks. Scores will be calculated in MET-minutes/week, based on self-reported duration and intensity of different physical activity domains (work, leisure, sport). Higher scores indicate higher levels of physical activity (better outcome).
8 weeks (end of intervention)
Safety evaluation
Time Frame: Through 8 weeks of intervention (Weeks 0-8)

To assess safety, participants will be asked whether they experienced any adverse events (AEs) during the 8-week intervention period. All reported AEs will be documented and classified by type and severity according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.

The outcome will be the number of participants with at least one treatment-related adverse event recorded from baseline through the end of the 8-week intervention.

Through 8 weeks of intervention (Weeks 0-8)
Average daily step count (measured via wearable activity tracker)
Time Frame: Cumulative average daily steps over Weeks 1-8

Physical activity will be monitored continuously during the 8-week intervention using a commercially available wearable device (e.g., Fitbit or Garmin).

The tracker will record daily step counts, active minutes and movement intensity.

The outcome will be the average number of steps per day during Week 8, as a marker of overall movement behavior. This complements patient-reported activity recorded in the physical activity diary.

Cumulative average daily steps over Weeks 1-8
Heart rate variability
Time Frame: 8 weeks (end of intervention)

Heart Rate Variability (HRV) is measured to assess autonomic nervous system activity and stress recovery. HRV will be recorded using a wearable chest strap sensor (e.g., Polar H10) or equivalent device, over a 5-minute resting period.

Outcome will be RMSSD (Root Mean Square of Successive Differences) in milliseconds.

8 weeks (end of intervention)
Natural killer cell activity
Time Frame: 8 weeks (end of intervention)

Natural killer (NK) cell activity will be assessed by blood sampling at baseline and Week 8. Cytotoxic activity will be measured by flow cytometry based on CD107a expression and IFN-gamma production.

Outcome will be the percentage of NK cells expressing CD107a after stimulation.

8 weeks (end of intervention)
Serum cytokine concentrations (IL-6, IL-10, TNF-alpha)
Time Frame: Week 4 (Mid-intervention), Week 8 (End of intervention)

Serum cytokines (IL-6, IL-10, TNF-alpha) will be measured using multiplex ELISA from venous blood samples collected at baseline, Week 4 and Week 8.

Outcomes will be reported as individual changes in cytokine concentrations (pg/mL) from baseline to Week 4 and Week 8.Outcomes will be reported as individual changes in cytokine concentrations (pg/mL); no composite score will be calculated.

Week 4 (Mid-intervention), Week 8 (End of intervention)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Claudia Loeffler, Dr., Würzburg University. Würzburg, Bayern, Germany, 97080
  • Principal Investigator: Marcela Winkler, Dr., Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus, Stuttgart, Baden Würtemberg, Germany, 70341

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 5, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 1, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 22, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • S00855-NIM

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer Survivors

Clinical Trials on Real-life forest bathing

Subscribe