Improving Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life in Patients With Rectal Cancer After Surgery With Intensified Follow-up & Surveillance (iRECOVER)

April 30, 2026 updated by: University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Improving Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life in Patients With Rectal Cancer After Surgery With Intensified Follow-up & Surveillance - a Randomized Controlled Trial (iRECOVER)

The goal of this clinical study is to gain further insights into the treatment of patients with Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) symptoms after rectal resection. The main question is: Can LARS symptoms and quality of life be improved by implementing an intensified follow-up program? Researchers will compare the results of the intervention group with the results of a control group in which patients do not receive an intensified follow-up program to determine whether the intervention works. Participants will undergo an intensified follow-up program which consists of several follow-up visits and medical treatment, pelvic floor muscle training and gynaecological and urological co-treatment in case of LARS symptoms and urinary or sexual complaints.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: After surgical treatment of patients with rectal cancer, up to 65% experience a symptom complex known as LARS (Low Anterior Resection Syndrome). Those affected suffer from symptoms such as fecal incontinence, frequent bowel movements and a strong urge to defecate, which can severely impair their quality of life. Therapy options include treatment with medication such as bulking agents or drugs that reduce bowel motility, pelvic floor muscle training or stimulation of the nerves that control the function of the rectum and pelvic floor.

Objective: The aim of the present study is to investigate whether an intensified follow-up program can improve the LARS symptoms and consequently the quality of life of patients after rectal resection. If the planned study shows success of the program, we will be able to structurally improve the aftercare of those affected.

Methods: The study is being conducted at several centers in Switzerland, including St. Claraspital Basel. Patients who have had a rectal resection are recruited prior to the repositioning of the artificial bowel outlet, which was created during the primary operation, and randomly assigned to one of the both study groups (intensified follow-up or standard treatment). The symptoms are recorded using various questionnaires and patients will be treated according to our action plan. If LARS symptoms occur, patients receive drug treatment, pelvic floor physiotherapy and, if necessary, sacral neurostimulation, which means implanting a device which stimulates the nerves that control the function of the rectum and pelvic floor. If patients suffer from urinary problems or impaired sexual function they will be referred to our urology or gynecology department for further diagnosis and treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

140

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Basel, Switzerland, 4002
        • Recruiting
        • Clarunis Universitäres Bauchzentrum Basel
      • Bern, Switzerland
        • Recruiting
        • Lindenhofspital Bern
        • Contact:
      • Bern, Switzerland
        • Not yet recruiting
        • St. Anna Spital Bern
        • Contact:
          • local PI
      • Lucerne, Switzerland
        • Recruiting
        • Kantonsspital Luzern
        • Contact:
      • Winterthur, Switzerland
        • Recruiting
        • Kantonsspital Winterthur
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients older than 18 years
  • patients with rectal cancer in the middle and lower third of the rectum in stages I to IV who underwent LAR with TME and protective ileostomy
  • able to give informed consent as documented by signature

Exclusion Criteria:

  • dementia or other psychiatric disorder that would prevent the patients from answering the questionnaires and experiencing sustainable training effects
  • impossibility of stoma reversal due to persistent anastomotic leak and/or local recurrence

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention group
Intensified follow-up program consisting of of several follow-up visits at 1, 4, 7 and 13 months and medical treatment, pelvic floor muscle training and gynaecological and urological co-treatment in case of LARS symptoms and urinary or sexual complaints which will be recorded using questionnaires.
The study intervention will be an intensified follow-up program which consists of different measures. Patients will attend follow-up visits 1, 4, 7 and 13 months after ileostomy repositioning, at which LARS symptoms, quality of life as well as sexual and urinary function will be recorded using various questionnaires. In case of LARS symptoms patients will receive medical treatment with loperamide and metamucil as well as pelvic floor muscle training (including biofeedback and home exercises). Regarding pelvic floor muscle training we are planning nine sessions instructed by physiotherapy staff. In case of therapy-resistant LARS symptoms after 6 months sacral neurostimulation is offered to the patients with a focus on incontinence symptoms and desire for surgery or transanal irrigation in patients with a focus on voiding disorders. In case of urinary and sexual complaints patients are referred to our urology or gynaecology department for further diagnostic and treatment.
No Intervention: Control group
Treatment according to standard guidelines, recording of symptoms using questionnaires at 1 and 13 months.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement of the LARS score after 13 months
Time Frame: 13 months after closure of ileostomy
The primary outcome is the change of the LARS score after participation for 13 months in an intensified follow-up program compared to standard treatment which means patients are only treated if they present themselves in our consultation hours due to complaints. The LARS score is recorded using the LARS score questionnaire, developed 2012 by Emmertson et al.. The LARS score consists of five questions on the topics incontinence for flatus, incontinence for liquid stools, frequency of bowel movements, clustering of stools and urgency. Each answer results in a number of points, those points are summarized in the end to give a total score. This score is categorized into a range of no LARS (score 21 and lower), minor LARS (score 21 - 29) and major LARS (score 30 - 42).
13 months after closure of ileostomy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patients' quality of life (QoL)
Time Frame: 1, 4, 7 and 13 months after closure of ileostomy

Patients' quality of life will be recorded using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Colorectal Cancer (EORTC-QLQ-CR29) which will be filled out by the patients before closure of ileostomy as well as 1, 4, 7 and 13 months after closure of ileostomy.

Maximum score is 140 points, minimum score 35 points. Higher scores mean worse outcomes.

1, 4, 7 and 13 months after closure of ileostomy
Urinary symptoms in women and men
Time Frame: 1, 4, 7 and 13 months after closure of ileostomy

Urinary symptoms in women and men will be recorded using the American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUA-SI) which is a validated questionnaire for urinary symptoms in women and men.

Maximum score is 35 points, minimum score 0 points. Higher scores mean worse outcomes.

1, 4, 7 and 13 months after closure of ileostomy
Sexual function in women
Time Frame: 1, 4, 7 and 13 months after closure of ileostomy

Sexual function in women will be recorded using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Female Sexual Matters Associated with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Module (ICIQ-FLUTSsex) which is a validated questionnaire for sexual complaints in women.

Maximum score is 14 points, minimum score 0 points. Higher scores mean worse outcomes.

1, 4, 7 and 13 months after closure of ileostomy
Sexual function in men
Time Frame: 1, 4, 7 and 13 months after closure of ileostomy

Sexual function in men will be recorded using the International Index of Erectile Dysfunction (IIEF-5) which is a validated questionnaire for sexual complaints in men.

Maximum score is 25 points, minimum score 5 points. Higher scores mean better outcomes.

1, 4, 7 and 13 months after closure of ileostomy
Readmission to hospital
Time Frame: 13 months
13 months
Costs
Time Frame: 13 months
13 months
Compliance to treatment intervention
Time Frame: 13 months
Recording of drop-outs, patients refusing to participate in interventions, tolerance of the medication and recording of side effects.
13 months
Natural history of incidence of LARS symptoms in control group
Time Frame: 13 months
Incidence of LARS symptoms will be measured by the LARS score. The LARS score consists of five questions on the topics incontinence for flatus, incontinence for liquid stools, frequency of bowel movements, clustering of stools and urgency. Each answer results in a number of points, those points are summarized in the end to give a total score. This score is categorized into a range of no LARS (score 21 and lower), minor LARS (score 21 - 29) and major LARS (score 30 - 42).
13 months
Prevalence of LARS
Time Frame: 13 months
13 months
Rate of secondary ostomy formation
Time Frame: 13 months
13 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Daniel Steinemann, Deputy chief physician, Clarunis - Universitäres Bauchzentrum Basel

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 24, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rectal Cancer

Clinical Trials on Intensified follow-up program

Subscribe