Impact of a PERsonalized CAse MAnagement Program for the Follow-up of Moderate and Severe aSTHma Patients on Exacerbations, Health Resource Use and Asthma Control: PERCASTHMA STUDY (PERCASTHMA)

December 10, 2022 updated by: Manuel Castilla Martinez, MurciaSalud

Impact of a Personalized Case Management Program for the Follow-up of Moderate and Severe Asthma Patients on Exacerbations, Health Resource Use and Asthma Control: PERCASTHMA STUDY

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to learn about the impact of the implementation of an intervention-based case management follow-up program during periods of clinical worsening or poor adherence in patients with moderate and severe asthma.

Patients will be randomized into two arms: a case management follow-up group and a control group that will follow-up according to routine care practice. A single masking (outcomes assessor) was performed. Researchers will compare the response on exacerbations, health resource use and asthma control between the two groups during a one-year follow-up. Outcomes on pulmonary function, quality of life, adherence to treatment, pulmonary inflammation parameters and systemic corticosteroid use will also be studied. Additionally, other baseline clinical characteristics and events of the previous year will be collected retrospectively for all patients.

The study was evaluated and approved by a local ethics committee.

All study participants will receive an asthma education session with review of inhaler technique and training in the use of self-management action plans. Only participants in the case management follow-up group will periodically send asthma control (ACT) and adherence (TAI) questionnaires to the case manager. If not completed, the case manager will contact the patient by telephone to determine the degree of asthma control and adherence. The case manager will also monitor the withdrawal of drugs on the electronic prescription. The patient will contact the case manager via a mobile app, phone or email if needed due to worsening symptoms or need for self-management support. With this information, the case manager will make decisions based on personalized medical instructions prepared by the pulmonologist at the baseline visit, which will be reviewed according to evolution.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Murcia
      • San Javier, Murcia, Spain, 30739
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Los Arcos del Mar Menor
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Manuel Castilla Martínez, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Desiree Lozano Vicente, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Beatriz Alcaraz Pérez
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Isabel María Flores Martín, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • José Valverde Molina, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Ada Luz Andreu Rondríguez, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Chunshao Hu Yang, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Yaiza Isabel Bonilla Pacheco, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Juan Orlando López Ojeda, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Julián Caballero Rodríguez, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years.
  • Previous diagnosis of bronchial asthma according to GEMA 5.2 criteria.
  • Follow-up in an asthma unit for at least 6 months and who do not present relevant uncontrolled comorbidities.
  • Classified as moderate or severe asthma according to therapeutic step at the beginning of the study, as defined by GEMA 5.1.
  • Aptitude for handling the technologies used.
  • Signed informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Simultaneous presence of other diseases that may simulate asthma symptoms (COPD, left heart failure, functional dyspnea/hyperventilation syndrome, inducible laryngeal obstruction...).
  • Severe psychosocial problems or any other clinical situation that prevents the signature of the informed consent and/or the follow-up proposed in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control group
Experimental: Case management group
The case manager will monitor asthma control (asthma control test, ACT) and adherence to treatment with questionnaires (inhaler adherence test, TAI) and electronic prescription withdrawal (e-prescription). The case manager will make decisions based on these results and according to pre-designed medical instructions. In addition, the patient will be able to contact the case manager for advice during periods of worsening symptoms. The patient will contact the case manager via a mobile app with messaging and video call option, as well as a contact phone number and email for consultations.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Annualized asthma exacerbation rate
Time Frame: From baseline to 12 months
Accumulated asthma exacerbations during follow-up period compared with control group and baseline
From baseline to 12 months
Annualized hospital admissions, emergency room visits, and unscheduled medical visits for asthma exacerbation rate
Time Frame: From baseline to 12 months
Hospital admissions, emergency room visits, and unscheduled medical visits for asthma exacerbation accumulated at the end of the follow-up period compared with control group and baseline
From baseline to 12 months
Average ACT score at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: At 6 and 12 months
ACT is a validated, self-administered questionnaire to assess asthma control in the last 4 weeks. Possible scores range from 5 (worst possible control) to 25 (best possible control). Scores equal to or greater than 20 suggest good asthma control. Average ACT score at 6 and 12 months compared with control group and baseline
At 6 and 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of low adherents at 12 months
Time Frame: At 12 months
Low adherence will be considered as electronic prescription withdrawal of less than 70% and/or a TAI score of 45 or lower. Percentage of low adherents at 12 months compared with control group and baseline
At 12 months
Mean change from baseline in pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in the first second (pre-bronchodilator FEV1) and zscore at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: At 6 and 12 months
Lung function was measured according to the SEPAR guidelines. Zscore is a tool to express results of spirometry that facilitates interpretation and comparison between patients with different characteristics. The Z-score indicates how many standard deviations a measured value is from predicted. Mean change from baseline in pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in the first second (pre-bronchodilator FEV1) and zscore at 6 and 12 months compared with control group and baseline
At 6 and 12 months
Mean FeNO value at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: At 6 and 12 months
Exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) will be measured using NioxVero electrochemical analyser according to standard use technique. FeNO is measured in ppb. Mean FeNO value at 6 and 12 months compared with control group and baseline.
At 6 and 12 months
Mean blood eosinophil count at 12 months
Time Frame: At 12 months
Mean blood eosinophil count at 12 months compared with control group and baseline.
At 12 months
Average AQLQ score at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: At 6 and 12 months
Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) is a validated, self-administered questionnaire to assess quality of life related to asthma. Possible scores range from 1 (worst possible quality of life) to 7 (best possible). The minimum clinically significant change is 0.5 points. Average AQLQ score at 6 and 12 months compared with control group and baseline.
At 6 and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 15, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 15, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 15, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 30, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

December 8, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 13, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2022

Last Verified

December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Asthma

Clinical Trials on Case management follow-up program

3
Subscribe