A Study on the Safety and Functionality of the Implantable Wireless Brain-Computer Interfaces for Motor Rehabilitation (STAIR)

April 17, 2025 updated by: Shanghai StairMed Technology Co., Ltd.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive, wireless brain-machine interface system (WRS) in patients with paralysis (resulting from spinal cord injuries, brainstem strokes, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or other motor neuron diseases causing complete or incomplete quadriplegia) or bilateral upper limb amputations. By leveraging brain-machine interface alternative technology, participants can use brain signals to control external devices (such as moving cursors, wheelchairs, robotic arms, WeChat Mini Programs, and other physical assistive devices), thereby improving their motor function and quality of life.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive, wireless brain-machine interface system (WRS) in patients with paralysis (resulting from spinal cord injuries, brainstem strokes, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or other motor neuron diseases causing complete or incomplete quadriplegia) or bilateral upper limb amputations. By leveraging brain-machine interface alternative technology, participants can use brain signals to control external devices (such as moving cursors, wheelchairs, robotic arms, WeChat Mini Programs, and other physical assistive devices), thereby improving their motor function and quality of life.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

5

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Shaanxi
      • Xi'an, Shaanxi, China, 710038
        • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 18-65 years;
  • Patients with complete or incomplete quadriplegia due to spinal cord injury, brainstem stroke, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), or other motor neuron diseases, or those with bilateral upper limb amputations;
  • Normal motor cortex function confirmed by neurological assessment;
  • Muscle strength of bilateral or unilateral upper limbs ≤ Grade 3;
  • Patients who have received standardized treatment and met diagnostic criteria for at least 12 months before screening, with stable disease status for ≥6 months;
  • Expected lifespan ≥12 months;
  • Normal cognitive function;
  • Normal hearing and vision, or corrected vision to normal with standard lenses;
  • Patients with stable caregivers;
  • Willing to sign informed consent and able to comply with follow-up requirements.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with neuropsychiatric disorders or psychological impairments;
  • Patients with brain MRI findings showing hemorrhage, tumors, anatomical abnormalities, or distortions;
  • History of severe systemic diseases (e.g., cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, renal, thyroid, gastrointestinal, or hematologic disorders), poorly controlled diabetes, or pregnancy in females;
  • History of infectious diseases (e.g., syphilis, HIV), severe traumatic brain injury, or major surgeries;
  • Presence of metal implants or devices (e.g., cochlear implants, pacemakers, neurostimulators, defibrillators), except for dental implants or other implants deemed non-interfering;
  • Surgical or anesthesia contraindications as determined by surgeons or anesthesiologists;
  • Morbid obesity (BMI >40);
  • Hearing impairment or uncorrectable visual deficits that would hinder prolonged computer monitor viewing;
  • Current participation in other clinical trials;
  • Other conditions considered unsuitable by investigators or medical staff.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Implantation of the WRS64
Implantation of the device and follow-up
Implantation of the device and follow-up

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse events
Time Frame: Within 6 months after implantation
The incidence of adverse events associated with the device or surgical procedure
Within 6 months after implantation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
WRS Efficacy Assessment- Accuracy
Time Frame: 6 months after the implantation
Validation of motor function improvement through cursor control performance metrics: the accuracy of of task list (number of correct items/ number of all items), the higher the better.
6 months after the implantation
WRS Efficacy Assessment- Path efficiency
Time Frame: 6 months after the implantation
Validation of motor function improvement is demonstrated through cursor control performance metrics, particularly path efficiency (the ratio of optimal to actual movement path). Higher values indicate better motor control performance.
6 months after the implantation
WRS Efficacy Assessment- Time consumption
Time Frame: 6 months after the implantation
Motor function improvement is validated through cursor control performance metrics, particularly time consumption (total task completion duration). Shorter durations indicate superior motor performance.
6 months after the implantation
Neurological Recovery Assessment
Time Frame: 3, 15, 30, 90, 180 days after implantation
The International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) scale was used to evaluate overall neurological status. The higher the scale score, the better the overall neurological status.
3, 15, 30, 90, 180 days after implantation
Changes in Quality of Life
Time Frame: 3, 15, 30, 90, 180 days after implantation
Variations in the MOS item short from health survey (SF-36) scores were evaluated during both the main study period and long-term follow-up phase (comparing baseline to 6-month post-implantation assessments). The score values directly reflect health status - higher scores indicate better functional outcomes and superior quality of life.
3, 15, 30, 90, 180 days after implantation
Changes in Cognitive Performance
Time Frame: 3, 15, 30, 90, 180 days after implantation
Variations in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores scores were evaluated during both the main study period and long-term follow-up phase (comparing baseline to 6-month post-implantation assessments). Elevated scores are associated with improved cognitive function.
3, 15, 30, 90, 180 days after implantation
Changes in Psychological Status
Time Frame: 3, 15, 30, 90, 180 days after implantation
Variations in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) scores were evaluated during both the main study period and long-term follow-up phase (comparing baseline to 6-month post-implantation assessments). Higher scores indicate poorer psychological status.
3, 15, 30, 90, 180 days after implantation
Changes in Anxiety Status
Time Frame: 3, 15, 30, 90, 180 days after implantation
Variations in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) scores were evaluated during both the main study period and long-term follow-up phase (comparing baseline to 6-month post-implantation assessments). Higher scores indicate poorer psychological status.
3, 15, 30, 90, 180 days after implantation
Changes in Depression Status
Time Frame: 3, 15, 30, 90, 180 days after implantation
Variations in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) scores were evaluated during both the main study period and long-term follow-up phase (comparing baseline to 6-month post-implantation assessments). Higher scores indicate poorer psychological status.
3, 15, 30, 90, 180 days after implantation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 8, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quadriplegia

Clinical Trials on Implant

Subscribe