Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy as a Neuroprotective Intervention in Pediatric Acquired Brain Injury With Cognitive Disability

April 24, 2025 updated by: Eman Mohammed Abdel Hamid Gaml, Kafrelsheikh University
This research aimed to investigate the effectiveness of hyperbaric oxygen therapy as a neuroprotective strategy for improving neurological outcomes in pediatric patients who have sustained acquired brain injury.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is a medical treatment that delivers high-concentration oxygen in a pressurized chamber. It was developed initially from diving physiology research and popularized by Dutch surgeon Boerema for its life-sustaining plasma oxygen diffusion under hyperbaric conditions.

The fundamental mechanism of HBOT operates through Henry's Law, enabling unprecedented increases in tissue oxygen partial pressures that surpass levels achievable in normal atmospheric conditions.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kafrelsheikh
      • Kafr Ash Shaykh, Kafrelsheikh, Egypt, 33516
        • Kafrelsheikh University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pediatric patients aged 4-12 years with acquired brain injury.
  • Confirmed neurological sequelae (e.g., cardiac arrest, intracranial hemorrhage, central nervous system infections, stroke, tumor, hypoxia) via MRI/neurological exam.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Positive family history of degenerative brain insults.
  • Behavioral problems.
  • Hyperbaric oxygen therapy contraindications:

    • Active epilepsy.
    • Respiratory insufficiency.
    • Uncontrolled heart failure.
    • Eustachian tube dysfunction.
    • Tympanic membrane rupture.
    • Mechanical ventilation dependency.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control group
Patients received conventional rehabilitation alone.
Patients received conventional rehabilitation alone.
Experimental: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy group
Patients received hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) using a monochamber hyperbaric chamber in addition to conventional rehabilitation.
Patients received hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) using a monochamber hyperbaric chamber in addition to conventional rehabilitation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Communication Function Classification System
Time Frame: Eight months post-intervention

The Communication Function Classification System (CFCS) was implemented to assess cognitive and speech capabilities across five levels of communicative competence.

  • Level I: Effective bidirectional communication (no need for external aids).
  • Level II: Consistent communication with familiar partners, occasional need for aids.
  • Level III: Communication requires significant effort and aids with familiar partners.
  • Level IV: Minimal communication, even with familiar partners.
  • Level V: No effective communication.
Eight months post-intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Nutritional intake functionality
Time Frame: Eight months post-intervention

Nutritional intake functionality was evaluated utilizing the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS). This seven-point scale was structured to differentiate between tube-dependent nutrition and total oral intake capabilities.

  • Level 1: Tube-dependent, no oral intake.
  • Level 2: Tube-dependent, minimal oral intake (e.g., ice chips).
  • Level 3: Tube-dependent, inconsistent oral intake of pureed foods.
  • Level 4: Oral intake of pureed foods only.
  • Level 5: Oral intake of soft foods.
  • Level 6: Oral intake of regular diet with modifications.
  • Level 7: Unrestricted oral intake (regular diet).
Eight months post-intervention
Visual function assessment
Time Frame: Eight months post-intervention

Visual function assessment was conducted through visual evoked potential testing, providing objective measurements of visual pathway integrity. Neurodevelopmental status was comprehensively evaluated using the Griffiths Mental Development Scales (GMDS). The GMDS yielded both subscale scores and an overall General Quotient (GQ).

  • ≥90: Normal development.
  • 80-89: Mild disability.
  • 70-79: Moderate disability.
  • <70: Severe disability.
Eight months post-intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 24, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The data will be available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author after the end of study for one year.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After the end of study for one year.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The data will be available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acquired Brain Injury

Clinical Trials on Conventional rehabilitation

Subscribe