Project COMET: Massed Prolonged Exposure for PTSD and SUD (PROJECT COMET)

October 23, 2025 updated by: Denise Aimee Hien, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Project COMET: Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Trial of Massed PTSD Treatment in a Community Substance Use Program

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if Massed Prolonged Exposure Therapy (M-PE) can improve PTSD symptoms and reduce substance use in adults receiving intensive outpatient (IOP) treatment for substance use disorder (SUD). The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does M-PE reduce PTSD symptoms more effectively than trauma treatment as usual (TAU)?
  • Does M-PE reduce the number of days participants use substances?
  • How do patient-centered outcomes (such as depression, suicidal thoughts, and quality of life) differ between M-PE and trauma TAU?
  • Researchers will compare M-PE to treatment as usual to see if M-PE leads to better mental health and substance use outcomes and lower dropout rates.

Participants will:

  • Attend multiple therapy sessions per week (M-PE) or receive usual care
  • Complete assessments at baseline, during treatment, end-of-treatment, 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month follow-up
  • Share feedback through surveys and interviews about their experience in the program

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and substance use disorder (SUD) often co-occur. PTSD+SUD comorbidity is associated with more severe PTSD, worse treatment outcomes for substance use, greater suicide risk and worse functioning than having one of these disorders. First-line treatments for PTSD, particularly Prolonged Exposure Therapy (PE), are effective in treating PTSD among those with a SUD. While PE is one of the most effective treatment options for PTSD among those with PTSD+SUD, effects are smaller and dropout is higher than among people with PTSD without a SUD. A promising way to enhance outcomes is to offer PE in a massed format (M-PE; i.e., multiple sessions per week instead of once weekly).

M-PE has been shown to be effective in improving PTSD symptoms and substantially reducing dropout in outpatient care. Preliminary findings suggest M-PE delivered concurrent to intensive SUD programming is a promising strategy that warrants further study. Evaluating the effectiveness of M-PE delivery in of SUD IOP program in improving PTSD and other mental health outcomes is the necessary next step in this critical research.

The mixed-method two-group Hybrid Type I effectiveness-implementation randomized clinical trial (RCT) aims to determine the effectiveness of M-PE delivery in SUD IOP in reducing dropout rates and improving outcomes as compared to trauma treatment as usual (TAU).

The specific aims are to 1) Compare the effectiveness of M-PE to trauma TAU in IOP SUD treatment in impacting PTSD symptoms and Percent days use of primary substance; 2) Explore differences in treatment arms on patient-centered outcomes, including: a) days use of other (non-primary) substances, b) depressive symptoms, c) functioning, c) quality of life (QoL), e) suicidal ideation, and f) participant satisfaction; 3) Examine gender as a moderator and changes in trauma-related cognitions, cravings, and their temporal association as mediators of change in PTSD and substance use; and 4) Conduct a mixed-method process evaluation to understand patients', providers', and clinical stakeholders' experiences with M-PE, explore barriers and facilitators to integrating M-PE into IOP SUD treatment, and identify strategies for widespread implementation.

Participants will include 168 male and female patients with any trauma type who are participating in IOP SUD program at Gateway Community Services, Inc. Assessments will occur at baseline, and will continue for the duration of treatment, at end-of-treatment, 1-month posttreatment, 3-months posttreatment, and 6-months posttreatment. We will conduct a mixed-method, multi-stakeholder process evaluation with patients, providers, and clinical leaders.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

168

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32204
        • Recruiting
        • Gateway Community Services
        • Contact:
          • Candy Hodgkins CEO - Gateway Comunity Services, Inc., Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)
          • Phone Number: 1-877-389-9966
          • Email: chodgkins@gwjax.com

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18+
  • Enrolled in SUD treatment at Gateway Community Services
  • Meet DSM-5 criteria for a SUD (Tobacco Use Disorder alone not sufficient for inclusion)
  • Meet DSM-5 criteria for PTSD
  • Able to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • severe cognitive impairment
  • current suicidal or homicidal intent requiring immediate treatment
  • current unstable psychotic or manic symptoms not attributable to SUD

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Massed Prolonged Exposure (M-PE) + Intensive Outpatient Program (IOP)
Participants randomized to this arm will receive Massed Prolonged Exposure (M-PE) therapy, a gold-standard treatment for PTSD delivered multiple times per week over 2-4 weeks. M-PE will be integrated into the standard Intensive Outpatient Program (IOP) for substance use disorder (SUD) at Gateway Community Services, Inc. This arm is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of delivering M-PE concurrently with SUD treatment in improving PTSD symptoms, reducing substance use, and improving patient-centered outcomes.
Massed Prolonged Exposure (M-PE) is a trauma-focused, evidence-based behavioral intervention for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). It is delivered over a compressed timeline (e.g., 10 sessions over 2-4 weeks) as opposed to weekly sessions over 3-4 months. This format has been shown to accelerate PTSD symptom reduction and reduce treatment dropout. In this study, M-PE will be delivered concurrently with an Intensive Outpatient Program (IOP) for substance use disorder (SUD) at Gateway Community Services. Sessions will be led by trained clinicians using a standardized PE protocol, with treatment including imaginal exposure, in vivo exposure, and processing.
Other Names:
  • M-PE
Active Comparator: Trauma Treatment as Usual (TAU) - IOP with Trauma Skills Group
Participants randomized to this arm will receive the standard Intensive Outpatient Program (IOP) for substance use disorder (SUD), which includes a weekly trauma skills group as part of usual care. This comparator arm allows for evaluation of whether M-PE enhances outcomes beyond those achieved through trauma-informed IOP care.

Patients randomized to usual care will receive standard intensive outpatient SUD treatment.

  • Resilience group (weekly)
  • Peer support
  • Individual therapy from a variety of modalities
Other Names:
  • Usual Care Condition

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinician Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5)
Time Frame: Baseline; End of Treatment (6 weeks post-randomization); 1-month (10 weeks), 3-month (18 weeks), and 6-month (30 weeks) post-randomization follow-up
Measures PTSD symptom severity, score range 0-80, higher scores mean greater symptom severity
Baseline; End of Treatment (6 weeks post-randomization); 1-month (10 weeks), 3-month (18 weeks), and 6-month (30 weeks) post-randomization follow-up
Time Line Follow back (TLFB)
Time Frame: Baseline; End of Treatment (6 weeks post-randomization); 1-month (10 weeks), 3-month (18 weeks), and 6-month (30 weeks) post-randomization follow-up
Measures percent days of alcohol or other drug use, score range 0-100%, higher scores indicate greater percent days of use
Baseline; End of Treatment (6 weeks post-randomization); 1-month (10 weeks), 3-month (18 weeks), and 6-month (30 weeks) post-randomization follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: Baseline; End of Treatment (6 weeks post-randomization); 1-month (10 weeks), 3-month (18 weeks), and 6-month (30 weeks) post-randomization follow-up
Depression symptom severity, range = 0-27, higher scores mean greater depression symptom severity
Baseline; End of Treatment (6 weeks post-randomization); 1-month (10 weeks), 3-month (18 weeks), and 6-month (30 weeks) post-randomization follow-up
Brief Psychosocial Functioning Inventory (B-IPF)
Time Frame: Baseline; End of Treatment (6 weeks post-randomization); 1-month (10 weeks), 3-month (18 weeks), and 6-month (30 weeks) post-randomization follow-up
Measures severity of impairment in psychosocial functioning, scores = 0-100, higher scores indicate greater impairment
Baseline; End of Treatment (6 weeks post-randomization); 1-month (10 weeks), 3-month (18 weeks), and 6-month (30 weeks) post-randomization follow-up
Brief Substance Craving Scale (BSCS)
Time Frame: Baseline; End of Treatment (6 weeks post-randomization); 1-month (10 weeks), 3-month (18 weeks), and 6-month (30 weeks) post-randomization follow-up
Assesses craving severity for a primary and, if applicable, secondary substance over the past 24 hours. Includes items on intensity, frequency, duration, and number of craving episodes. Higher scores reflect greater craving.
Baseline; End of Treatment (6 weeks post-randomization); 1-month (10 weeks), 3-month (18 weeks), and 6-month (30 weeks) post-randomization follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sonya Norman Professor Of Clinical, Psychiatry, Ph.D, University of California, San Diego

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 2, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 28, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

May 13, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

October 27, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 23, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

We plan to share individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results reported in the study, following de-identification and in compliance with IRB and data use agreements. A data dictionary will also be provided to allow for accurate interpretation of variables and data structure. Data will be made available to qualified researchers upon request, following approval of a data use agreement and verification of appropriate data security measures.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The IPD and supporting information will be available beginning 6 months after publication of the primary outcomes and will remain available for 5 years.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Qualified researchers affiliated with academic institutions or research organizations will be able to request access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) and accompanying materials, including the data dictionary and study protocol. Access will include data related to primary and secondary outcomes, as well as adverse events, once appropriate data use agreements are in place.

Requests must be submitted to the study team and will be reviewed for scientific merit, ethical use, and compliance with institutional and regulatory guidelines. Approved users will be granted access through a secure data-sharing platform or via direct encrypted transfer, in accordance with Rutgers University and sponsor policies on data security and privacy.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Trauma and Stressor Related Disorders

Clinical Trials on Massed Prolonged Exposure Therapy (M-PE)

Subscribe