- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07061886
- Original Trial
Drug Effects on Mood and Behavior - Expectancy (MESA-X)
Study Overview
Detailed Description
Expectancies are known to influence responses to psychoactive drugs. The study team and others have shown previously, using a balanced placebo design, that expectancies influence responses to alcohol, nicotine, caffeine, stimulant drugs, and cannabinoids. In these studies subjects are randomly assigned to one of four conditions: Expect the drug and get the drug; Expect the drug and get placebo; Expect placebo and get the drug; Expect placebo and get placebo. This allows researchers to separate pharmacological effects from expectancy effects.
Recently there has been much discussion about the role of expectancies specifically in responses to psychedelic drugs. Expectancies are especially important in the use of very low doses, referred to as 'microdoses'. These doses are typically at or below the threshold of detectability, but users take them with strong prior beliefs that the drugs improve mood and cognition. The beneficial effects have been difficult to demonstrate under laboratory conditions, perhaps because in the laboratory the drugs are administered without the explicit expectation of benefits, and the administration of the drugs is to some extent blinded. The present study is designed to separate the pharmacological effects of a low dose of LSD from effects that are influenced by expectancies.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Early Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Hanna Molla
- Phone Number: 7737023560
- Email: hmolla@uchicago.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
- Recruiting
- University of Chicago
-
Contact:
- Hanna Molla
- Email: hmolla@uchicago.edu
-
Principal Investigator:
- Harriet de Wit
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- English Fluency
- High school education or higher
- BMI between 19-30 kg/m2
Exclusion Criteria:
- Individuals with a medical condition contraindicating study participation as determined by the study physician (e.g., liver disease, abnormal EKG, liver or cardiovascular disease)
- High blood pressure (>140/90)
- Current suicidal ideation or suicide attempt in past 12 months
- Past year severe substance use disorder
- Personal or first-degree relative with history of psychosis
- Currently taking any psychiatric medication (for conventional antidepressants must be off for ≥ 2 weeks)
- Active panic disorder
- Severe obsessive-compulsive disorder
- Severe post-traumatic stress disorder
- Women who are pregnant or planning to become pregnant
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: LSD (13 micrograms), Identity of substance known
LSD tartrate in tasteless solution (0.13 mL).
Subjects will receive LSD, and they (but not the research assistant) will be told the identity of the drug.
|
The serotonin 2A receptor agonist LSD
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: LSD (13 micrograms), Identity uncertain
LSD tartrate in tasteless solution (0.13 mL).
Subjects will be told they might receive a stimulant, sedative, low dose of hallucinogen, or placebo, and will receive LSD.
|
The serotonin 2A receptor agonist LSD
Other Names:
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo, Identity of substance known
Distilled water (0.13 mL).
Subjects will receive placebo, and they (but not the research assistant) will be told the identity of the drug.
|
Distilled water (0.26 mL)
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo, Identity uncertain
Distilled water (0.13 mL).
Subjects will be told they might receive a stimulant, sedative, low dose of hallucinogen, or placebo, and will receive placebo.
|
Distilled water (0.26 mL)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: During in-lab session: Pre-drug, and every 60 minutes post-drug from 0-4 hours
|
Momentary states will be assessed using VAS to measure ratings of 'depressed', 'anxious', 'motivated', and 'energetic', on a scale of 0 (Not at all) to 100 (Very much).
|
During in-lab session: Pre-drug, and every 60 minutes post-drug from 0-4 hours
|
|
Addiction Research Center Inventory (ARCI)
Time Frame: During in-lab session: Pre-drug, and every 60 minutes post-drug from 0-4 hours
|
The ARCI is a 53-item true or false questionnaire that assess effects of specific drug classes.
It includes scales measuring: amphetamine (A); benzedrine group (BG; energy and intellectual efficiency); morphine-benzedrine group (MBG; euphoric effects); LSD (hallucinogen-like effects); pentobarbital-chlorpromazine-alcohol group (PCAG; sedative effects); and marijuana (M).
|
During in-lab session: Pre-drug, and every 60 minutes post-drug from 0-4 hours
|
|
Drug Effects Questionnaire (DEQ)
Time Frame: During in-lab session: Pre-drug, and every 60 minutes post-drug from 0-4 hours
|
The DEQ measures overall drug effects.
It consists of questions on a visual analog scale about the subjective effects of drugs.
Subjects are asked to rate the extent they feel a drug effect, whether they like or dislike the drug effect, and if given a choice would they want to take more of the drug.
Scores range from 0-100.
|
During in-lab session: Pre-drug, and every 60 minutes post-drug from 0-4 hours
|
|
5 Dimensions of Altered States of Consciousness (5D-ASC) scale
Time Frame: End of session (4 hours post-drug)
|
The 5D-ASC assesses altered states of consciousness in five domains, and is sensitive to LSD administration (Schmid et al. 2014).
Scores range from 0-100.
|
End of session (4 hours post-drug)
|
|
Ultimatum Game
Time Frame: During in lab session: 1.5 hours post-drug
|
In this task, participants play the role of responder in a series of single-shot computer interactions.
They engage in 60 trials in which they interact with different computer-simulated proposers.
On each trial they are allocated $10 to split between themselves and the participant.
Participants will receive 60 different monetary offers ranging from fair (50:50 splits) to increasingly unfair (10:90 splits), presented in random order.
For each offer, participants must decide whether to accept the offer, in which case both players receive the proposed amounts, or reject the offer, in which case both players receive nothing.
This task will measure how the drug affects perception of fairness, and decision-making in social contexts.
The task takes approximately a 30 minutes to complete.
|
During in lab session: 1.5 hours post-drug
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiovascular (Heart rate; beats per minute)
Time Frame: During in-lab session: baseline (pre-drug), and every 60 minutes post-drug from 0-4 hours
|
heart rate (HR) will be measured using a portable digital blood pressure monitor.
|
During in-lab session: baseline (pre-drug), and every 60 minutes post-drug from 0-4 hours
|
|
Cardiovascular (blood pressure; mmHg)
Time Frame: During in-lab session: baseline (pre-drug), and every 60 minutes post-drug from 0-4 hours
|
Systolic pressure (SP), and diastolic pressure (DP) will be measured using a portable digital blood pressure monitor.
|
During in-lab session: baseline (pre-drug), and every 60 minutes post-drug from 0-4 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Hanna Molla, University of Chicago
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Dittrich A. The standardized psychometric assessment of altered states of consciousness (ASCs) in humans. Pharmacopsychiatry. 1998 Jul;31 Suppl 2:80-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-979351.
- Martin WR, Sloan JW, Sapira JD, Jasinski DR. Physiologic, subjective, and behavioral effects of amphetamine, methamphetamine, ephedrine, phenmetrazine, and methylphenidate in man. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1971 Mar-Apr;12(2):245-58. doi: 10.1002/cpt1971122part1245. No abstract available.
- Murphy RJ, Muthukumaraswamy S, de Wit H. Microdosing Psychedelics: Current Evidence From Controlled Studies. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2024 May;9(5):500-511. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.01.002. Epub 2024 Jan 26.
- Bershad AK, Schepers ST, Bremmer MP, Lee R, de Wit H. Acute Subjective and Behavioral Effects of Microdoses of Lysergic Acid Diethylamide in Healthy Human Volunteers. Biol Psychiatry. 2019 Nov 15;86(10):792-800. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.05.019. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
- Aron, A., Melinat, E., Aron, E. N., Vallone, R. D., & Bator, R. J. (1997). The Experimental Generation of Interpersonal Closeness: A Procedure and Some Preliminary Findings. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(4), 363-377. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297234003
- Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. (1996). Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). In APA PsycTests
- de Wit H, Molla HM, Bershad A, Bremmer M, Lee R. Repeated low doses of LSD in healthy adults: A placebo-controlled, dose-response study. Addict Biol. 2022 Mar;27(2):e13143. doi: 10.1111/adb.13143. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
- Fadiman, J and Gruber, J (2025) Microdosing for Health, Healing, and Enhanced Performance, St Martins Group
- Fischman MW, Foltin RW. Utility of subjective-effects measurements in assessing abuse liability of drugs in humans. Br J Addict. 1991 Dec;86(12):1563-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01749.x.
- Güth, W, RSchmittberger, B Schwarze (1982) An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Volume 3, 367-388
- Hammami MM, Al-Gaai EA, Alvi S, Hammami MB. Interaction between drug and placebo effects: a cross-over balanced placebo design trial. Trials. 2010 Nov 19;11:110. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-110.
- Lyvers MF, Maltzman I. The balanced placebo design: effects of alcohol and beverage instructions cannot be independently assessed. Int J Addict. 1991 Sep;26(9):963-72. doi: 10.3109/10826089109058933.
- McNair, D., Lorr, M., Droppleman, L., (1971). POMS, Profile of Mood States. E. a. I. T. Services.
- Metrik J, Kahler CW, Reynolds B, McGeary JE, Monti PM, Haney M, de Wit H, Rohsenow DJ. Balanced placebo design with marijuana: pharmacological and expectancy effects on impulsivity and risk taking. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012 Oct;223(4):489-99. doi: 10.1007/s00213-012-2740-y. Epub 2012 May 16.
- Molla H, Lee R, Tare I, de Wit H. Greater subjective effects of a low dose of LSD in participants with depressed mood. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2024 Apr;49(5):774-781. doi: 10.1038/s41386-023-01772-4. Epub 2023 Dec 2.
- Palmer AM, Brandon TH. Nicotine or expectancies? Using the balanced-placebo design to test immediate outcomes of vaping. Addict Behav. 2019 Oct;97:90-96. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.04.026. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
- Skopp G, Potsch L, Mattern R, Aderjan R. Short-term stability of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), N-desmethyl-LSD, and 2-oxo-3-hydroxy-LSD in urine, assessed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Clin Chem. 2002 Sep;48(9):1615-8. No abstract available.
- Szigeti B, Heifets BD. Expectancy Effects in Psychedelic Trials. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2024 May;9(5):512-521. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.02.004. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB25-0658
- 5R01DA002812-35 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on LSD
-
University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandUniversity of Basel; University Psychiatric Clinics BaselCompleted
-
University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandRecruiting
-
Felix MuellerSwiss Medical Society for Psycholytic TherapyEnrolling by invitationPersonal Experience of Substance-assisted Therapy Using Psilocybin, MDMA, and LSDSwitzerland
-
Distribuidora Biolife SA de CVRecruitingNeuroprotective | Addiction;Drug(S);LSDMexico
-
University of ChicagoNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)RecruitingDepression | Major Depressive Disorder | LSDUnited States
Clinical Trials on LSD
-
Universidade do PortoPortuguese Institute of Rheumatology; Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar...RecruitingAnkylosing Spondylitis | SpondyloarthritisPortugal
-
Eleusis TherapeuticsCompleted
-
University of ChicagoNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)RecruitingDepression | Major Depressive Disorder | LSDUnited States
-
University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandRecruiting
-
University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandCompletedAnxiety Disorders | PatientsSwitzerland
-
St. Olavs HospitalNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyCompletedDepressive Disorder | Depressive Disorder, MajorNorway
-
Friederike HolzeNot yet recruiting
-
Eleusis TherapeuticsCompleted
-
Rigshospitalet, DenmarkActive, not recruiting
-
Definium Therapeutics US, Inc.Active, not recruitingMajor Depressive DisorderUnited States