Endoscopic Evaluation for Iron Deficiency Anemia in Patients on Antithrombotic Therapy (BEACON-IDA)

A Pilot Study Evaluating the Benefit of Endoscopic Assessment for Iron Deficiency Anemia in Patients Receiving Antithrombotic Therapy

This is a single-center, randomized pilot study evaluating the feasibility and safety of two management strategies for patients on antithrombotic therapy who present with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB). Participants will be randomized to either repeated endoscopic evaluations or a conservative medical approach with limited testing. The study aims to assess whether conservative management yields similar clinical outcomes and quality of life compared to standard repeated endoscopic procedures. Results will inform the design of a larger trial and address the current lack of guidelines for managing recurrent iron-deficiency anemia in this patient population.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Antithrombotic therapy plays a critical role in preventing thrombotic events in patients with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation. However, these therapies are associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding, including obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB), which is often recurrent and linked to high morbidity and mortality.

This single-center, prospective, randomized pilot study aims to assess the feasibility and safety of two different management strategies for patients on antithrombotic therapy presenting with OGIB. Approximately 20 participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio into two groups:

Group A will undergo repeated gastrointestinal evaluations (e.g., endoscopy, colonoscopy, capsule endoscopy) as clinically indicated, along with iron supplementation (oral or intravenous) or blood transfusions as needed.

Group B will receive a single round of gastrointestinal evaluation, iron supplementation or transfusions as needed, and regular laboratory monitoring (hemoglobin and ferritin levels).

The primary objective is to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a larger randomized controlled trial comparing conservative medical management to standard repeated endoscopic evaluation. The secondary objective is to compare the quality of life between the two groups.

This study will also assess recruitment strategies, measurement tools, and the safety of a "watchful waiting" approach. Ultimately, the findings will help determine whether endoscopic evaluation provides clinical benefit in patients with iron-deficiency anemia on antithrombotic therapy who have had negative initial endoscopic workups. Currently, there are no established guidelines for managing recurrent iron-deficiency anemia in this population.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada, G8Z 3R9
        • Recruiting
        • Centre hospitalier affilié universitaire régional de Trois-Rivières
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Camille Abi-Raad, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult men and postmenopausal women with iron deficiency anemia, and premenopausal women with iron deficiency anemia and a negative gynecological evaluation;

    a. Laboratory-confirmed iron deficiency anemia (hemoglobin < 120 g/L for women, < 130 g/L for men, and ferritin < 30 ng/L);

  2. Patients receiving anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy
  3. Negative esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), colonoscopy, and capsule endoscopy for gastrointestinal bleeding within six months prior to study enrollment
  4. Willing and able to provide written informed consent
  5. Able to read and understand French

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Ongoing overt gastrointestinal bleeding
  2. Acute coronary syndrome, acute neurological event, sepsis, or respiratory failure within the past week
  3. Pregnant women
  4. Known gastrointestinal or hematological malignancy
  5. Contraindications to capsule endoscopy
  6. History of bariatric surgery, gastrectomy, or segmental resection of the small intestine
  7. Inability to take oral iron
  8. Other sources of blood loss (e.g., urinary, gynecological, hematoma, hemolysis)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard Endoscopic Evaluation
Participants will undergo repeated gastrointestinal evaluations (e.g., endoscopy, colonoscopy, capsule endoscopy) as clinically indicated, along with iron supplementation (oral or IV) or blood transfusions as needed.
Examinations of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract (including the stomach, small intestine, and colon) will be performed to identify the source of bleeding. These examinations may be repeated based on the treating physician's assessment. Iron supplementation (ferrous sulfate) will be administered either orally (per os) or intravenously (IV), and blood transfusions will be provided if necessary.
Experimental: Conservative Medical Management
Participants will receive a single round of gastrointestinal evaluation, iron supplementation (oral or IV) or blood transfusions as needed, and regular lab monitoring (hemoglobin and ferritin levels).
The investigational intervention involves a conservative treatment approach guided by a decision-making algorithm based on iron deficiency anemia values. This algorithm, developed from guidelines by the British Society of Gastroenterology and the American Gastroenterological Association, determines whether patients receive oral or IV ferrous sulfate or a blood transfusion. Laboratory parameters (hemoglobin, ferritin) will be monitored at weeks 4, 12, 38, and 64. After iron therapy, hemoglobin response will be assessed at 4 weeks, and treatment will continue for ~3 months post-normalization to ensure iron store repletion. Blood tests will be repeated every 6 months to detect recurrence.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of Participant Enrollment
Time Frame: 64 weeks

This will be evaluated by the :

- Proportion of eligible participants who consent and receive the allocated intervention; - Proportion of treated participants who complete both laboratory tests and the quality-of-life questionnaire twice during the study period.

64 weeks
Hemoglobin level
Time Frame: At weeks 4, 12, 38, and 64 following enrollment
Relative change of hemoglobin
At weeks 4, 12, 38, and 64 following enrollment
Hematocrit level
Time Frame: At weeks 4, 12, 38, and 64 following enrollment
Relative change of hematocrit
At weeks 4, 12, 38, and 64 following enrollment
Ferritin
Time Frame: At weeks 4, 12, 38, and 64 following enrollment
Relative change of ferritin
At weeks 4, 12, 38, and 64 following enrollment
Reticulocyte count
Time Frame: At weeks 4, 12, 38, and 64 following enrollment
Relative change of Reticulocyte count
At weeks 4, 12, 38, and 64 following enrollment
Serum iron
Time Frame: At weeks 4, 12, 38, and 64 following enrollment
Relative change of serum level
At weeks 4, 12, 38, and 64 following enrollment
Transferrin saturation
Time Frame: At weeks 4, 12, 38, and 64 following enrollment
Relative change of transferrin saturation
At weeks 4, 12, 38, and 64 following enrollment
Total number of blood transfusions
Time Frame: At weeks 4, 12, 38, and 64 following enrollment
The cumulative count of all blood transfusion events administered to a participant during the study period.
At weeks 4, 12, 38, and 64 following enrollment
Total number of dose of ferrous sulfate administered
Time Frame: At weeks 4, 12, 38, and 64 following enrollment
The cumulative count of individual doses of ferrous sulfate given to a participant during the study period
At weeks 4, 12, 38, and 64 following enrollment
Adverse Events Reporting
Time Frame: Continuously monitored and recorded throughout the 12-month follow-up period
Adverse events will be documented in the case report form (CRF). Events will be classified as serious or non-serious. A serious adverse event is defined as any event resulting in hospitalization, including death from any cause, cardiovascular events related to anemia, or the occurrence of active bleeding. The need to discontinue antithrombotic therapy due to persistent anemia will also be recorded.
Continuously monitored and recorded throughout the 12-month follow-up period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Endoscopic Investigations and Diagnoses in the Standard Care Group
Time Frame: Throughout the 12-month follow-up period
For participants in the standard care group, all endoscopic procedures performed (e.g., upper endoscopy, colonoscopy, capsule endoscopy) and any resulting diagnoses will be recorded. This information will be used to characterize the diagnostic yield and clinical management in the standard intervention arm.
Throughout the 12-month follow-up period
Quality of Life Assessment (GIQLI)
Time Frame: At baseline and at week 64 (end of study)
Quality of life will be assessed using the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI), a validated 36-item questionnaire developed in Germany. It includes five subscales: gastrointestinal symptoms, emotional well-being, physical function, social function, and medical treatment. Each item is scored from 0 to 4, with a total score ranging from 0 to 144. Higher scores indicate better quality of life. The validated French version of the GIQLI (Slim et al., 1999) will be used in this study. Completion time is approximately 20 minutes.
At baseline and at week 64 (end of study)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Éva Mathieu, PhD, Centre Intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Mauricie-et-du-Centre-du-Québec

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 6, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 6, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 6, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 18, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

July 28, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 28, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Iron-Deficiency Anemia

Clinical Trials on Standard endoscopic evaluation

Subscribe