- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07101978
- Original Trial
Hyperthermia in Patients With Chronic Primary Pain - Effects on Thermoregulation, Somatosensory System and Movement Evoked Pain (HYPPRI-1)
Hyperthermia in Healthy and Patients With Chronic Primary Pain - Effects on Thermoregulation, Somatosensory System, Movement Evoked Pain (HYPPRI-1)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Kay-Uwe Hanusch, Dr.scient.med
- Phone Number: +41 31 848 5005
- Email: kay.hanusch@bfh.ch
Study Locations
-
-
Canton of Bern
-
Bern, Canton of Bern, Switzerland, 3012
- Bern University of Applied Science
-
Contact:
- Kay-Uwe Hanusch, Dr.scient.med
- Phone Number: +41 31 848 5005
- Email: kay.hanusch@bfh.ch
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
patients:
- Confirmed diagnosis of widespread pain (ICD-11 MG30.01)
- Widespread Pain Index (WPI) ≥ 7 and Symptom Severity (SS) scale ≥ 5 or WPI) ≥ 3 and SS ≥ 9,
- Pain >= 3 month and VAS >= 4,0
- Body - infrared-A-Bulb Distance < 38cm (overweight participants)
- Signed declaration of consent
healthy:
- No chronic illnesses
- No acute infections
- No regular medication: To avoid interactions
- BMI ≤ 40kg/cm2
- Mental health: No psychiatric diagnoses or psychotropic medication in your medical history
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participation in other clinical studies
- Contraindications for hyperthermia (severe cardiovascular diseases, tumour diseases, acute infections, pregnant and breastfeeding women)
- Acute and / or feverish microbial infections
- Participants with severe somatic, rheumatic concomitant endocrine or neurological diseases, in particular neurological diseases associated with cognitive disorders, severe liver or kidney and cardiac diseases
- participants who are permanently treated with opioids, cannabis, immunosuppressive drugs (e.g. corticoids, immunosuppressants) or alpha/beta-A(nta)gonists due to a disease from the group described above
- participants with pain due to a serious psychiatric illness (bipolar disorder, psychosis, personality disorder, severe depression, substance abuse) and serious systemic or neurological disorders
- pregnancy or breastfeeding (for women)
- Intake of medication within 6 weeks that inhibits the reuptake of the neurotransmitter serotonin or binds to receptors of this neurotransmitter group
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: serial whole body hyperthermia
For the study, the method of water-filtered whole-body hyperthermia is used.
The HT 3000 system (by heckel medizintechnik GmbH, Olgastrasse 25, 73728 Esslingen, Garmany) is used, in which the entire body is heated to a core body temperature above the physiological 37°C.
The aim is to achieve a core body temperature of 38.5°C within the framework of mild whole-body hyperthermia.
After this warm-up phase, a temperature plateau phase of about 15 minutes follows, in which an attempt is made to maintain the core body temperature of 38.5°C.
In the temperature plateau phase, a slight increase in the body core temperature is usually observed.
The total time required for a session is given as 2.5 to 3 hours, but this depends on the individual constitution and daily condition of the patient and can be subject to fluctuations.
|
The hyperthermia treatment is carried out in a cycle of two treatments per week, with at least one day in between, over a period of three weeks, according to the manufacturer's instructions.
According to the guidelines, the rectal (possibly vaginal) temperature (as body core temperature), heart rate and oxygen saturation (Sp02) are continuously determined during the hyperthermiatreatment.
During the treatment, continuous supervision by trained personnel is guaranteed, and a doctor is on call.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Circadian core body temperature
Time Frame: Week 0
|
A BodyCap HF (high-frequency) measurement capsule is used for circadian monitoring of core body temperature over a 24-hour period.
The single-use capsule is swallowed and excreted naturally after the measurement.
|
Week 0
|
|
Circadian core body temperature
Time Frame: Week 5
|
A BodyCap HF (high-frequency) measurement capsule is used for circadian monitoring of core body temperature over a 24-hour period.
The single-use capsule is swallowed and excreted naturally after the measurement.
|
Week 5
|
|
Cold detection threshold (CDT); °C
Time Frame: Week 0
|
CDT is a part of quantitative sensory testing.
A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated cold temperature stimuli (Thermode) 3x applied to the skin.
Z-values are calculate.
|
Week 0
|
|
Cold detection threshold (CDT); °C
Time Frame: week 5
|
CDT is a part of quantitative sensory testing.
A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated cold temperature stimuli (Thermode) 3x applied to the skin.
Z-values are calculate.
|
week 5
|
|
Warm detection threshold (WDT); °C
Time Frame: Week 0
|
WDT is a part of quantitative sensory testing.
A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated warm temperature stimuli (Thermode) 3x applied to the skin.
Z-values are calculate.
|
Week 0
|
|
Warm detection threshold (WDT); °C
Time Frame: week 5
|
WDT is a part of quantitative sensory testing.
A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated warm temperature stimuli (Thermode) 3x applied to the skin.
Z-values are calculate.
|
week 5
|
|
Thermal sensory limen (TSL) ; °C
Time Frame: week 0
|
TSL is a part of quantitative sensory testing.
A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated warm and cold temperature stimuli (Thermode) alternately 6x applied to the skin.
Z-values are calculate and count number of cold stimuli that are perceived as hot.
|
week 0
|
|
Thermal sensory limen (TSL) ; °C
Time Frame: week 5
|
TSL is a part of quantitative sensory testing.
A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated warm and cold temperature stimuli (Thermode) alternately 6x applied to the skin.
Z-values are calculate and count number of cold stimuli that are perceived as hot.
|
week 5
|
|
Cold pain threshold (CPT); °C
Time Frame: week 0
|
CPT is a part of quantitative sensory testing.
A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated nociceptive cold temperature stimuli (Thermode) 3x applied to the skin.
Z-values are calculate.
|
week 0
|
|
Cold pain threshold (CPT); °C
Time Frame: week 5
|
CPT is a part of quantitative sensory testing.
A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated nociceptive cold temperature stimuli (Thermode) 3x applied to the skin.
Z-values are calculate.
|
week 5
|
|
Heat pain threshold (HPT); °C
Time Frame: week 0
|
HPT is a part of quantitative sensory testing.
A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated nociceptive heat temperature stimuli (Thermode) 3x applied to the skin.
Z-values are calculate.
|
week 0
|
|
Heat pain threshold (HPT); °C
Time Frame: week 5
|
HPT is a part of quantitative sensory testing.
A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated nociceptive heat temperature stimuli (Thermode) 3x applied to the skin.
Z-values are calculate.
|
week 5
|
|
Mechanical detection threshold (MDT) ; mN
Time Frame: week 0
|
MDT is a part of quantitative sensory testing.
A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated mechanical stimuli (different strengths Frey filaments) 10x applied to the skin Z-values are calculated.
|
week 0
|
|
Mechanical detection threshold (MDT) ; mN
Time Frame: week 5
|
MDT is a part of quantitative sensory testing.
A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated mechanical stimuli (different strengths Frey filaments) 10x applied to the skin Z-values are calculated.
|
week 5
|
|
Mechanical pain threshold (MPT), count of sharp and blunt stimuli
Time Frame: week 0
|
MPT is a part of quantitative sensory testing.
A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated mechanical stimuli (PinPrick with different weights) 10x applied to the skin.
Mechanical pain threshold (MPT).
Count number of sharp and blunt stimuli.
Z-values are calculated.
|
week 0
|
|
Mechanical pain threshold (MPT), count of sharp and blunt stimuli
Time Frame: week 5
|
MPT is a part of quantitative sensory testing.
A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated mechanical stimuli (PinPrick with different weights) 10x applied to the skin.
Mechanical pain threshold (MPT).
Count number of sharp and blunt stimuli.
Z-values are calculated.
|
week 5
|
|
Mechanical pain sensitivity (MPS) ; NRS
Time Frame: week 0
|
MPS is a part of quantitative sensory testing.
A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated mechanical stimuli (PinPrick with different weights) 35x applied to the skin.
The Numeric Rating Scale (0 = no pain to 100 = worst pain imaginable) is queried.
Z-values are calculated.
|
week 0
|
|
Mechanical pain sensitivity (MPS) ; NRS
Time Frame: week 5
|
MPS is a part of quantitative sensory testing.
A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated mechanical stimuli (PinPrick with different weights) 35x applied to the skin.
The Numeric Rating Scale (0 = no pain to 100 = worst pain imaginable) is queried.
Z-values are calculated.
|
week 5
|
|
Summative pain amplification (WUR); NRS
Time Frame: week 0
|
WUR (wind-up ratio) is a part of quantitative sensory testing.
A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated mechanical stimuli (PinPrick with different weights) single and seriell 10x applied to the skin.
The Numeric Rating Scale (0 = no pain to 100 = worst pain imaginable) for single and seriell stimuli are compared into relation.
Z-values are calculated.
|
week 0
|
|
Summative pain amplification (WUR); NRS
Time Frame: week 5
|
WUR (wind-up ratio) is a part of quantitative sensory testing.
A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated mechanical stimuli (PinPrick with different weights) single and seriell 10x applied to the skin.
The Numeric Rating Scale (0 = no pain to 100 = worst pain imaginable) for single and seriell stimuli are compared into relation.
Z-values are calculated.
|
week 5
|
|
Vibration detection threshold (VDT) ; x/8
Time Frame: week 0
|
VDT is a part of quantitative sensory testing.
A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated mechanical stimuli (64Hz tuning fork) 3x applied to the skin.
The x/8 vibration is measure (0/8 no perception and 8/8 strengthest perception).
Z-values are calculated.
|
week 0
|
|
Vibration detection threshold (VDT) ; x/8
Time Frame: week 5
|
VDT is a part of quantitative sensory testing.
A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated mechanical stimuli (64Hz tuning fork) 3x applied to the skin.
The x/8 vibration is measure (0/8 no perception and 8/8 strengthest perception).
Z-values are calculated.
|
week 5
|
|
Pressure pain threshold (PPT), kgf/1cm2
Time Frame: week 0
|
PPT is a part of quantitative sensory testing.
A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated mechanical stimuli (pain pressure algometer) 5x applied to the skin.
Z-values are calculated.
|
week 0
|
|
Pressure pain threshold (PPT), kgf/1cm2
Time Frame: week 5
|
PPT is a part of quantitative sensory testing.
A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated mechanical stimuli (pain pressure algometer) 5x applied to the skin.
Z-values are calculated.
|
week 5
|
|
Dynamic mechanical allodynia (DMA), NRS
Time Frame: week 0
|
DMA is a part of quantitative sensory testing.
A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated mechanical stimuli (brush, cotton wool and Q-Tip) 5x applied to the skin.
Z-values are calculated.
The Numeric Rating Scale (0 = no pain to 100 = worst pain imaginable) ist queried.
Z-values are calculated.
|
week 0
|
|
Dynamic mechanical allodynia (DMA), NRS
Time Frame: week 5
|
DMA is a part of quantitative sensory testing.
A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated mechanical stimuli (brush, cotton wool and Q-Tip) 5x applied to the skin.
Z-values are calculated.
The Numeric Rating Scale (0 = no pain to 100 = worst pain imaginable) ist queried.
Z-values are calculated.
|
week 5
|
|
6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
Time Frame: Week 0
|
Walking back and forth as far as possible along a 30-meter corridor in 6 minutes, taking breaks as needed ( total distance covered is recorded in meters, pain is measured before and after the test, 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable)
|
Week 0
|
|
6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
Time Frame: Week 5
|
Walking back and forth as far as possible along a 30-meter corridor in 6 minutes, taking breaks as needed ( total distance covered is recorded in meters, pain is measured before and after the test, 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable)
|
Week 5
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ)
Time Frame: Week 0
|
The instrument assesses subjective pain experience and evaluates both the quality and numerical intensity of pain (0 = no pain; 10 = worst pain imaginable)
|
Week 0
|
|
McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ)
Time Frame: Week 5
|
The instrument assesses subjective pain experience and evaluates both the quality and numerical intensity of pain (0 = no pain; 10 = worst pain imaginable)
|
Week 5
|
|
McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ)
Time Frame: Week 12
|
The instrument assesses subjective pain experience and evaluates both the quality and numerical intensity of pain (0 = no pain; 10 = worst pain imaginable)
|
Week 12
|
|
McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ)
Time Frame: Week 30
|
The instrument assesses subjective pain experience and evaluates both the quality and numerical intensity of pain (0 = no pain; 10 = worst pain imaginable)
|
Week 30
|
|
Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20)
Time Frame: Week 0
|
An inventory including 20 questions about fatigue-symptoms (each from 1 ("Yes, that is true") to 5 ("No, that is not true")) covering 5 dimensions (general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, mental fatigue)
|
Week 0
|
|
Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20)
Time Frame: Week 5
|
An inventory including 20 questions about fatigue-symptoms (each from 1 ("Yes, that is true") to 5 ("No, that is not true")) covering 5 dimensions (general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, mental fatigue)
|
Week 5
|
|
Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20)
Time Frame: Week 12
|
An inventory including 20 questions about fatigue-symptoms (each from 1 ("Yes, that is true") to 5 ("No, that is not true")) covering 5 dimensions (general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, mental fatigue)
|
Week 12
|
|
Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20)
Time Frame: Week 30
|
An inventory including 20 questions about fatigue-symptoms (each from 1 ("Yes, that is true") to 5 ("No, that is not true")) covering 5 dimensions (general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, mental fatigue)
|
Week 30
|
|
General Depression Scale (ADS-L)
Time Frame: Week 0
|
is a german self-report questionnaire designed to assess depressive symptoms in the general population adapted from the CES-D.
(20 items, 4-point Likert scale (0 = rarely or none of the time, 3 = most or all of the time)
|
Week 0
|
|
General Depression Scale (ADS-L)
Time Frame: Week 5
|
is a german self-report questionnaire designed to assess depressive symptoms in the general population adapted from the CES-D.
(20 items, 4-point Likert scale (0 = rarely or none of the time, 3 = most or all of the time)
|
Week 5
|
|
General Depression Scale (ADS-L)
Time Frame: Week 12
|
is a german self-report questionnaire designed to assess depressive symptoms in the general population adapted from the CES-D.
(20 items, 4-point Likert scale (0 = rarely or none of the time, 3 = most or all of the time)
|
Week 12
|
|
General Depression Scale (ADS-L)
Time Frame: Week 30
|
is a german self-report questionnaire designed to assess depressive symptoms in the general population adapted from the CES-D.
(20 items, 4-point Likert scale (0 = rarely or none of the time, 3 = most or all of the time)
|
Week 30
|
|
Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ)
Time Frame: Week 0
|
Is a psychological questionnaire designed to assess a person's beliefs about how physical activity and work may influence their pain.
It focuses on fear-avoidance behaviours, particularly in individuals with musculoskeletal pain (e.g., low back pain).
The questionnaire consists of 16 items divided into two subscales: physical activity (FABQ-PA) and work (FABQ-W).
Items are rated on a 7-point Likert scale (from "completely disagree" to "completely agree").
|
Week 0
|
|
Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ)
Time Frame: Week 5
|
Is a psychological questionnaire designed to assess a person's beliefs about how physical activity and work may influence their pain.
It focuses on fear-avoidance behaviours, particularly in individuals with musculoskeletal pain (e.g., low back pain).
The questionnaire consists of 16 items divided into two subscales: physical activity (FABQ-PA) and work (FABQ-W).
Items are rated on a 7-point Likert scale (from "completely disagree" to "completely agree").
|
Week 5
|
|
Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ)
Time Frame: Week 12
|
Is a psychological questionnaire designed to assess a person's beliefs about how physical activity and work may influence their pain.
It focuses on fear-avoidance behaviours, particularly in individuals with musculoskeletal pain (e.g., low back pain).
The questionnaire consists of 16 items divided into two subscales: physical activity (FABQ-PA) and work (FABQ-W).
Items are rated on a 7-point Likert scale (from "completely disagree" to "completely agree").
|
Week 12
|
|
Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ)
Time Frame: Week 30
|
Is a psychological questionnaire designed to assess a person's beliefs about how physical activity and work may influence their pain.
It focuses on fear-avoidance behaviours, particularly in individuals with musculoskeletal pain (e.g., low back pain).
The questionnaire consists of 16 items divided into two subscales: physical activity (FABQ-PA) and work (FABQ-W).
Items are rated on a 7-point Likert scale (from "completely disagree" to "completely agree").
|
Week 30
|
|
Avoidance-Endurance Fast-Screen (AEFS)
Time Frame: week 0
|
Description: Is a short screening questionnaire designed to identify maladaptive pain coping patterns, specifically avoidance and endurance behaviours in individuals with musculoskeletal pain. It differentiates between fear-avoidance responses and endurance-related coping styles (e.g., persistence despite pain). The AEFS includes a 7-point scale (0=never to 6=always) for Pain Persistence (PPS) from the Avoidance-Endurance Questionnaire (AEQ), as well as two dichotomous (0=yes, 1=no) mood items from the Beck-Depressions-Inventar. The PPS scale is administered using two response scales for coping with mild and severe pain. |
week 0
|
|
Avoidance-Endurance Fast-Screen (AEFS)
Time Frame: week 5
|
Description: Is a short screening questionnaire designed to identify maladaptive pain coping patterns, specifically avoidance and endurance behaviours in individuals with musculoskeletal pain. It differentiates between fear-avoidance responses and endurance-related coping styles (e.g., persistence despite pain). The AEFS includes a 7-point scale (0=never to 6=always) for Pain Persistence (PPS) from the Avoidance-Endurance Questionnaire (AEQ), as well as two dichotomous (0=yes, 1=no) mood items from the Beck-Depressions-Inventar. The PPS scale is administered using two response scales for coping with mild and severe pain. |
week 5
|
|
Avoidance-Endurance Fast-Screen (AEFS)
Time Frame: week 12
|
Description: Is a short screening questionnaire designed to identify maladaptive pain coping patterns, specifically avoidance and endurance behaviours in individuals with musculoskeletal pain. It differentiates between fear-avoidance responses and endurance-related coping styles (e.g., persistence despite pain). The AEFS includes a 7-point scale (0=never to 6=always) for Pain Persistence (PPS) from the Avoidance-Endurance Questionnaire (AEQ), as well as two dichotomous (0=yes, 1=no) mood items from the Beck-Depressions-Inventar. The PPS scale is administered using two response scales for coping with mild and severe pain. |
week 12
|
|
Avoidance-Endurance Fast-Screen (AEFS)
Time Frame: week 30
|
Description: Is a short screening questionnaire designed to identify maladaptive pain coping patterns, specifically avoidance and endurance behaviours in individuals with musculoskeletal pain. It differentiates between fear-avoidance responses and endurance-related coping styles (e.g., persistence despite pain). The AEFS includes a 7-point scale (0=never to 6=always) for Pain Persistence (PPS) from the Avoidance-Endurance Questionnaire (AEQ), as well as two dichotomous (0=yes, 1=no) mood items from the Beck-Depressions-Inventar. The PPS scale is administered using two response scales for coping with mild and severe pain. |
week 30
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
BDNF
Time Frame: Week 0
|
Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) in blood to measure nociplasticity
|
Week 0
|
|
BDNF
Time Frame: Week 5
|
Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) in blood to measure nociplasticity
|
Week 5
|
|
PRISE (Patient-Rated Inventory of Side Effects)
Time Frame: 30min post treatment
|
A tool used to assess the presence and severity of side effects (0=no severity, 3= greater severity) across nine organ/function domains, including gastrointestinal, nervous system, heart, eyes/ears, skin, genital/urinary, sleep, sexual function, and other areas
|
30min post treatment
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Director: Kay-Uwe Hanusch, Dr.scient.med, Bern University of Applied Sciences
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Pain
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Nervous System Diseases
- Wounds and Injuries
- Connective Tissue Diseases
- Heat Stress Disorders
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases
- Signs and Symptoms
- Hyperthermia
- Fibromyalgia
- Chronic Pain
- Muscular Diseases
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Neuromuscular Diseases
- Rheumatic Diseases
- Body Temperature Changes
Other Study ID Numbers
- F.016677-42-PHYW-1
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Healthy
-
University of Vermont Medical CenterAvocado Nutrition CenterRecruitingHealthy | Healthy Volunteers | Healthy Subjects | Healthy Volunteer | Healthy Adult | Healthy Volunteers Only | Healthy Male and Female Subjects | Healthy Non-smokersUnited States
-
Dragonfly TherapeuticsRecruitingHealthy | Healthy Participants | Healthy Adult Females | Volunteer | Healthy Adult MaleAustralia
-
University of PalermoCompletedHealthy | Healthy Volunteers | Healthy Subjects | Healthy Participants | Static Stretching | Stretch | StretchingItaly
-
Prevent Age Resort "Pervaya Liniya"RecruitingHealthy Aging | Healthy Diet | Healthy LifestyleRussian Federation
-
Umm Al-Qura UniversityActive, not recruitingHealthy | Healthy Participants | Healthy Adult | Healthy Women | Healthy Adult Females | Healthy Adult Participants | Healthy Young Adults | Healthy Adult Female Participants | Healthy Adult Male | Poor Sleep Quality | Healthy (Controls) | Poor Sleeping Quality | Healthy Adult Male Subjects | Health Adult SubjectsSaudi Arabia
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterCompletedHealthy Volunteers | Healthy Subjects | Healthy AdultsNetherlands
-
University of PalermoCompletedHealthy Participants | Healthy Adult Participants | Healthy Young AdultsItaly
-
Yale UniversityNot yet recruitingHealth-related Benefits of Introducing Table Olives Into the Diet of Young Adults: Olives For HealthHealthy Diet | Healthy Lifestyle | Healthy Nutrition | CholesterolUnited States
-
PfizerRecruitingHealthy | Healthy AdultsUnited States
-
Atisama TherapeuticsRecruitingHealthy | Healthy SmokerAustralia
Clinical Trials on serial whole body hyperthermia
-
University of ZurichRecruiting
-
Universität Duisburg-EssenCompletedDepression, UnipolarGermany
-
Massachusetts General HospitalUniversity of California, San FranciscoRecruiting
-
National Center for Research Resources (NCRR)UnknownRheumatic DiseasesUnited States
-
University of ArizonaBrain & Behavior Research Foundation; The Depressive and Bipolar Disorder Alternative... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyRecruiting
-
Massachusetts General HospitalNational Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)RecruitingInflammation | Hyperthermia | Major Depressive DisorderUnited States
-
Barry SandlerSteadman Philippon Research InstituteRecruitingDepression | Mood Disorders | Healthy (Controls)United States
-
ElmediXCompletedAdvanced Cancer | Pancreatic Cancer MetastaticBelgium
-
Charles (Chuck) RaisonWithdrawnFibromyalgiaUnited States