Effectiveness of School-based Oral Health Intervention for Children

August 3, 2025 updated by: Arshed Muhammad, Universiti Putra Malaysia

Effectiveness of a School-Based Oral Health Promotion Program on Oral Health Practices, Behaviour, Self-Efficacy, and Clinical Outcomes Among Primary School Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Schools provide an ideal setting for early interventions. Evidence suggests that educational programs incorporating behavioural change theories can improve oral hygiene practices and clinical outcomes.

A School-Based Oral Health Promotion Program on Oral Health Practices, Behaviour, Self-Efficacy, and Clinical Outcomes Among Primary School Children for six months, while the control group will receive no intervention, only routine care.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Poor oral health in children leads to pain, absenteeism, and impaired quality of life. Schools provide an ideal setting for early interventions. Evidence suggests that educational programs incorporating behavioural change theories can improve oral hygiene practices and clinical outcomes.

A School-Based Oral Health Promotion Program on Oral Health Practices, Behaviour, Self-Efficacy, and Clinical Outcomes Among Primary School. The oral health promotion intervention will be implemented through weekly interactive sessions lasting 30-40 minutes over six months. These sessions, conducted by trained dental educators and teachers, will use animations, storytelling, demonstrations, and role-plays to teach proper toothbrushing, the importance of fluoride toothpaste, healthy eating habits, and the need for regular dental visits. Children will participate in supervised toothbrushing once a week, supported by peer ambassadors who reinforce daily practices. Educational leaflets and videos will engage parents, while posters in classrooms serve as reminders. Follow-up assessments, including questionnaires and clinical indices, will be conducted at six months, while the control group will receive no intervention, only routine care.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

600

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children aged 6-8 years enrolled in selected schools
  • Written informed consent from parents/guardians and assent from children

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children with systemic conditions affecting oral health
  • Those currently in other oral health interventions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control group
The control group will be given no intervention other than they will receive routinely
Experimental: Intervention group
Arm Description: The oral health promotion intervention will be implemented through weekly interactive sessions lasting 30-40 minutes over a period of six months. These sessions, conducted by trained dental educators and teachers, will use animations, storytelling, demonstrations, and role-plays to teach proper toothbrushing, the importance of fluoride toothpaste, healthy eating habits, and the need for regular dental visits. Children will participate in supervised toothbrushing once a week, supported by peer ambassadors who reinforce daily practices. Educational leaflets and videos will engage parents, while posters in classrooms serve as reminders. Follow-up assessments, including questionnaires and clinical indices, will be conducted at six months.
Arm Description: The oral health promotion intervention will be implemented through weekly interactive sessions lasting 30-40 minutes over a period of six months. These sessions, conducted by trained dental educators and teachers, will use animations, storytelling, demonstrations, and role-plays to teach proper toothbrushing, the importance of fluoride toothpaste, healthy eating habits, and the need for regular dental visits. Children will participate in supervised toothbrushing once a week, supported by peer ambassadors who reinforce daily practices. Educational leaflets and videos will engage parents, while posters in classrooms serve as reminders. Follow-up assessments, including questionnaires and clinical indices, will be conducted at six months.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Plaque score
Time Frame: 6 months

Plaque score index: 0: No plaque.

  1. Separate flecks of plaque at the gum line.
  2. A thin band of plaque along the gum line.
  3. A band of plaque wider than 1mm but covering less than one-third of the tooth.
  4. Plaque covering one-third to two-thirds of the tooth.
  5. Plaque covering more than two-thirds of the tooth. Higher scores indicate more plaque and poorer oral hygiene.
6 months
Oral Hygiene
Time Frame: 6-months

Oral Hygiene will be assessed by the presence of debris (plaque) and calculus (tartar) on selected tooth surfaces, measured by the Simplified Oral Hygiene Index (OHI-S)

Individual Debris Index (DI-S) and Calculus Index (CI-S):

Each of the six surfaces is scored individually for both debris and calculus using a 0-3 scale:

0: No debris or calculus is present.

  1. Debris or calculus covers less than one-third of the surface.
  2. Debris or calculus covers between one-third and two-thirds of the surface.
  3. Debris or calculus covers more than two-thirds of the surface. Good: 0.0 - 1.2 Fair: 1.3 - 3.0 Poor: 3.1 - 6.0
6-months
Gingival score
Time Frame: 6 months

Gingival score assessed by the gingival score index:

0: Normal gingiva, no inflammation.

  1. Mild inflammation - slight color change and edema (swelling), no bleeding on probing.
  2. Moderate inflammation - redness, edema, glazing, and bleeding on probing.
  3. Severe inflammation - marked redness, edema, ulceration, and tendency towards spontaneous bleeding. The index typically uses a scale of 0 to 3, with 0 representing normal gingiva and higher scores indicating increasing severity of inflammation
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
oral health practices
Time Frame: 6 months
Oral health practices by using the WHO Child Oral Health Questionnaire: o assess children's oral health practices through a structured set of questions. These questionnaires typically cover knowledge, attitude, and practices related to oral hygiene, including frequency of brushing, use of fluoride toothpaste, and dental visits. The score is used to evaluate the overall oral health practices of the child, often categorized as good, fair, or poor.
6 months
Oral Health Impact Profile.
Time Frame: 6 months

Oral Health Impact Profile. The Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) is a questionnaire used to assess how oral health problems affect a person's daily life and well-being. The OHIP-14, a shorter version, is commonly used and focuses on 14 specific questions related to oral health impacts 0 = Never

  1. = Hardly ever
  2. = Occasionally
  3. = Fairly often
  4. = Very often Greater score shows better impact andvice versa
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 5, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 5, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 10, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 3, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

August 11, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 11, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • BMU-BDC

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Only the study protocol, statistical plan, and results will be shared in publications in peer-reviewed journals

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Health

Clinical Trials on School-Based Oral Health Promotion Program

Subscribe