Quality of Life, Functional and Cognitive Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer (PRO-MIND)

April 26, 2026 updated by: Galip Can Uyar, Ankara Etlik City Hospital

Prospective Observational Evaluation of Quality of Life, Functional Status, and Cognitive Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Undergoing Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitor Therapy

This prospective observational study will evaluate quality of life, functional status, and cognitive outcomes in men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) receiving androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) in addition to standard androgen deprivation therapy. ARPIs in this study include abiraterone acetate, apalutamide, enzalutamide, and darolutamide, depending on local availability. A total of 102 patients will be enrolled from two academic oncology centers in Türkiye.

Participants will be assessed at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months using validated Turkish versions of established questionnaires: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue (FACT-F), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Clinical parameters, ECOG performance status, routine laboratory results, and treatment-related adverse events will also be recorded.

The primary outcomes are longitudinal changes in FACT-Cog and FACT-F scores. Secondary outcomes include changes in depression, sleep quality, laboratory results, and adverse events. This study will provide real-world evidence on how ARPI therapy affects cognitive health and quality of life in patients with mHSPC.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) is a disease stage in which systemic treatment strategies significantly affect survival, functional status, and quality of life. The incorporation of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) into clinical practice has improved oncological outcomes, yet their influence on cognitive function, fatigue, mood, and sleep requires further real-world investigation.

In this study, the term androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) refer to abiraterone acetate, apalutamide, enzalutamide, and darolutamide. While abiraterone, apalutamide, and enzalutamide are widely used in routine practice in Türkiye, darolutamide may also be included when accessible. All patients will receive ARPIs in combination with standard androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).

This prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study will enroll 102 patients with newly diagnosed mHSPC at Ankara Etlik City Hospital and Gazi University. Assessments will take place at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months.

Validated Turkish patient-reported outcome instruments will be applied:

FACT-Cog: score range 0-148; higher scores = better cognitive functioning.

FACT-F: score range 0-52; higher scores = less fatigue.

PHQ-9: score range 0-27; cut-offs: 5 (mild), 10 (moderate), 15 (moderately severe), 20+ (severe depression).

PSQI: score range 0-21; global score >5 indicates poor sleep quality.

Additional measures will include ECOG performance status (0-5; higher = worse functioning), demographic and clinical characteristics, comorbidities, and routine laboratory tests. Treatment-related adverse events will be recorded according to CTCAE criteria.

The primary outcomes are longitudinal changes in FACT-Cog and FACT-F scores between baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Secondary outcomes include changes in PHQ-9 and PSQI scores, ECOG performance status, and laboratory results, as well as adverse event profiles. Exploratory analyses will assess the relationship between clinical or laboratory variables and patient-reported outcomes.

Statistical analyses will include descriptive statistics, group comparisons, and repeated-measures modeling. Multivariable regression will be applied to identify predictors of impaired cognitive or functional outcomes.

By incorporating validated Turkish instruments and explicitly defining ARPI agents, this study aims to generate robust real-world evidence on the cognitive, functional, and quality-of-life effects of ARPI therapy in mHSPC. The findings are expected to guide supportive care strategies and optimize treatment decision-making.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

102

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Yenimahalle
      • Ankara, Yenimahalle, Turkey (Türkiye), 06270
        • Recruiting
        • Etlik City Hospital Medical Oncology Department
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
    • Çankaya
      • Ankara, Çankaya, Turkey (Türkiye)
        • Recruiting
        • Gazi University Medical Oncology Department
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Male patients aged 18 years and older with histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, initiating androgen deprivation therapy plus an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (abiraterone, apalutamide, or enzalutamide) in oncology clinics. Participants will be consecutively enrolled at Ankara Etlik City Hospital and Gazi University Hospital.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC)
  • Planned initiation of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (abiraterone, apalutamide, or enzalutamide) as part of routine clinical care
  • Ability to complete patient-reported outcome questionnaires (FACT-Cog, FACT-F, PHQ-9, PSQI)
  • Written informed consent obtained

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior systemic therapy for metastatic prostate cancer (except ≤3 months of ADT)
  • Known history of severe cognitive impairment that precludes completion of questionnaires
  • Concurrent active malignancy requiring systemic treatment
  • Inability to comply with study procedures or follow-up
  • Any condition judged by the investigator to compromise participation or data integrity

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitor Cohort
Men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer receiving androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (abiraterone acetate, apalutamide, enzalutamide, or darolutamide) in combination with standard androgen deprivation therapy. Participants will be assessed at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months for quality of life, cognitive function, fatigue, depression, sleep quality, clinical parameters, and treatment-related adverse events.
Men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer will receive androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (abiraterone acetate, apalutamide, enzalutamide, or darolutamide) in addition to standard androgen deprivation therapy. The choice of ARPI will be determined by routine clinical practice. The study does not assign treatments; it observes patient outcomes under real-world conditions.
Other Names:
  • Abiraterone acetate
  • Enzalutamide
  • Darolutamide
  • Apalutamide

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog) Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment initiation
FACT-Cog total score ranges from 0 to 148, with higher scores indicating better cognitive functioning. Both continuous change (follow-up minus baseline) and categorical decline (≥10-point decrease from baseline, indicating clinically meaningful cognitive deterioration) will be assessed.
Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment initiation
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Fatigue (FACT-F) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment initiation
FACT-F total score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating less fatigue burden (better status). Both continuous change and categorical threshold (FACT-F ≤34 = clinically significant fatigue) will be evaluated.
Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment initiation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Depression Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment initiation
PHQ-9 total score ranges from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms. Both continuous change and categorical threshold (PHQ-9 ≥10 = moderate-to-severe depression) will be reported.
Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment initiation
Change From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Global Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment initiation
PSQI global score ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating poorer sleep quality. Both continuous change and categorical threshold (PSQI >5 = poor sleep quality) will be assessed.
Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment initiation
Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment initiation
ECOG performance status ranges from 0 (fully active) to 4 (completely disabled), with higher scores indicating worse functional status. Both continuous change and categorical threshold (≥1-point worsening = functional decline) will be evaluated.
Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment initiation
Change From Baseline in Liver Function Parameters
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment initiation
Change in serum AST (U/L), ALT (U/L), total bilirubin (mg/dL), and alkaline phosphatase (U/L). Higher levels reflect worsening liver function. Continuous values will be reported.
Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment initiation
Change From Baseline in Renal Function Parameters
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment initiation
Change in serum creatinine (mg/dL) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m²). Higher creatinine and lower eGFR reflect worse renal function. Continuous values will be reported.
Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment initiation
Change From Baseline in Electrolyte Levels
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment initiation
Change in serum sodium, potassium, calcium, and other routine electrolytes (mmol/L). Both increases and decreases outside the normal reference range will be noted. Continuous values will be reported.
Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment initiation
Change From Baseline in Complete Blood Count (CBC)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment initiation
Change in hemoglobin (g/dL), white blood cell count, neutrophils, lymphocytes, and platelet count (×10⁹/L). Both continuous changes and categorical thresholds (e.g., anemia = hemoglobin <12 g/dL) will be reported.
Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment initiation

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Treatment-Related Adverse Events (CTCAE v5.0)
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months after treatment initiation
Number and type of adverse events attributed to androgen receptor pathway inhibitor therapy, graded according to CTCAE v5.0 (Grade 1 = mild to Grade 5 = death, with higher grades indicating greater severity).
Baseline to 6 months after treatment initiation
Correlation Between Clinical/Laboratory Parameters and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog) Score
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
Exploratory correlation between clinical/laboratory parameters (e.g., metabolic profile, PSA) and FACT-Cog score change. Both continuous scores (range: 0-148; higher scores = better cognitive function) and categorical decline (≥10-point decrease from baseline = meaningful deterioration) will be analyzed.
Baseline to 6 months
Correlation Between Clinical/Laboratory Parameters and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Fatigue (FACT-F) Score
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
Exploratory correlation between clinical/laboratory parameters and FACT-F score change. Both continuous scores (range: 0-52; higher scores = less fatigue burden) and categorical threshold (FACT-F ≤34 = clinically significant fatigue) will be analyzed.
Baseline to 6 months
Correlation Between Clinical/Laboratory Parameters and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Depression Score
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
Exploratory correlation between clinical/laboratory parameters and PHQ-9 score change. Both continuous scores (range: 0-27; higher scores = worse depression) and categorical threshold (PHQ-9 ≥10 = moderate-to-severe depression) will be analyzed.
Baseline to 6 months
Correlation Between Clinical/Laboratory Parameters and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Global Score
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
Exploratory correlation between clinical/laboratory parameters and PSQI score change. Both continuous scores (range: 0-21; higher scores = poorer sleep quality) and categorical threshold (PSQI >5 = poor sleep quality) will be analyzed.
Baseline to 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Galip Can Uyar, MD, Ankara Etlik City Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 22, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 26, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 15, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 12, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 12, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

September 18, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 28, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2026

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer (mHSPC)

Clinical Trials on Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitors (ARPIs)

Subscribe