Culturally Adapted Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Individuals At Risk of First Episode Psychosis

Culturally Adapted Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Individuals At Risk of First Episode Psychosis: A Mixed Method Study

Young people constitute nearly half of Pakistan's population and are highly vulnerable to risk factors for mental illness, including poverty, inequality, abuse, and violence. Estimates suggest that 19-34% of children and adolescents experience emotional or behavioural disorders, though this is likely underestimated. In recent years, research has focused on those at imminent risk of developing serious conditions such as first episode psychosis. The concept of an At-Risk Mental State (ARMS) has highlighted the urgent need for interventions that address current symptoms, improve functioning, and reduce transition to psychosis.

Up to 80% of young people with ARMS have another diagnosable condition, and almost half show poor psychosocial outcomes even six years after initial help-seeking. Evidence demonstrates that early identification and treatment can delay or prevent psychosis, including severe and enduring illnesses like schizophrenia. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) is among the most effective evidence-based approaches for this group. However, existing evidence comes largely from high-income countries, raising concerns about cultural applicability in low-resource settings.

This study will culturally adapt and field test a manualised CBT intervention for young people at risk of first episode psychosis. To our knowledge, this is the first such study in a low-income country. Findings will inform scalable, culturally relevant interventions for Pakistan and similar contexts.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Aims and Objectives:

The study has following aims and objectives:

  1. To culturally adapt the existing Cognitive Behavior Therapy for those at risk of first episode psychosis- "evidence-based therapy for people with ARMS" (Van der Gaag, et al., 2013).
  2. To field test the culturally adapted intervention in a randomised controlled trial
  3. To check whether adapted intervention reduces or delay the rates or incidence of transition from ARMS to first episode psychosis;
  4. To check whether adapted intervention improves other symptoms such as depression, anxiety and/or level of functioning in ARMS
  5. To explore the pereceived usefulness of intervention including perceived barriers and facilitators from different stakeholders' perspective.

Feasibility and acceptability of the intervention is defined as:

  • Recruitment rates, attendance (attending more than 70% of intervention sessions)
  • Acceptability of the intervention (based on participants satisfaction, attendance, attrition rates)
  • Completeness of assessment tools and the assessment schedule by participants

    • Preliminary efficacy of the intervention

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Sindh
      • Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
        • Recruiting
        • Karwan e Hayat
      • Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
        • Recruiting
        • Commuity/Schools/Colleges

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female help-seeking individual aged 16-35 years;
  • Score 6 or above on PQ-16
  • Meet the at risk of FEP criteria using CAARMS Operationalized Intake Criteria based on three groups (vulnerability, attenuated psychosis or brief limited intermittent psychotic symptoms group);
  • Assessed as competent to provide informed consent.
  • Give written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Temporary resident unlikely to be available for follow up.
  • Unable to engage, participate or respond to research questionnaires.
  • a history of psychotic illness (treated or untreated).
  • previous treatment with an antipsychotic or mood-stabilising agent.
  • active substance abuse (except nicotine or caffeine) or dependence within the last three months, according to DSM-V criteria.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cognitive Behavior Therapy for those at risk of first episode psychosis
The participants in the intervention group will receive a culturally adapted manualised cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). The interventions aim to reduce symptoms, normalises psychosis-like experiences and prevents a catastrophic appraisal of the psychotic-like symptoms from occurring
Participants will receive a culturally adapted manualised Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) for those at risk of first episode psychosis (FEP). The intervention aims to reduce symptoms, normalise psychosis-like experiences, and prevent catastrophic appraisals that may lead to delusions. It integrates psychoeducation, behavioural experiments, and techniques addressing cognitive biases. By reframing unusual experiences as perceptual or reasoning biases, distress and emotional arousal are reduced, lowering the chance of fixed, frightening beliefs. Homework tasks further support coping. CBT for At-Risk Mental States has shown effectiveness in reducing transition to psychosis and improving recovery. This study will adapt and field test the manual, with potential for remote delivery via phone, video, or AI tools to enhance accessibility.
Other Names:
  • CBT-FEP
No Intervention: Treatment as Usual

Treatment As Usual (TAU):

Local medical, psychiatric and primary care services provide standard routine care according to their clinical judgment and available resources. These participants will receive an initial assessment along with TAU as ascertained by their treating doctor at the hospital. In current practice, individuals with ARMS (at risk of first episode psychosis) are not routinely referred to any psychological service in Pakistan. TAU in Pakistan largely comprises of pharmacotherapy. Research staff will record the nature and intensity of the routine care delivered for each participant.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acceptability Indicator
Time Frame: From baseline to 12th week (end of intervention)
Intervention acceptability will be assessed using data on attendance. Criterion for acceptability is a mean attendance rate of >70%.
From baseline to 12th week (end of intervention)
Feasibility Indicator
Time Frame: From baseline to 12th week (end of intervention)
feasibility will be determined by collecting data on recruitment and retention rates, The success criterion of feasibility will be to recruit > 50% of eligible participants
From baseline to 12th week (end of intervention)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Prodromal Questionnaire
Time Frame: From baseline to 12th week (end of intervention)
A brief 16-item self-report screening questionnaire assesses the presence of attenuated psychotic symptoms on a two-point scale (true/false) followed by a 4-point distress rating for each item. A cut of 6 or above considered for further assessment to confirm at risk criteria
From baseline to 12th week (end of intervention)
Brief-Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States
Time Frame: From baseline to 12th week (end of intervention)
A semi-structured interview that assists in the identification of individuals at risk of developing a first-episode psychotic disorder.
From baseline to 12th week (end of intervention)
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire
Time Frame: From baseline to 12th week (end of intervention)
The participants will rate their satisfaction with treatment at 3 months (after completion of the intervention) using the CSQ
From baseline to 12th week (end of intervention)
Calgary Depression Scale
Time Frame: From baseline to 12th week (end of intervention)
The Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) is a depression rating scale especially developed for assessing depression in schizophrenia. Higher score shows higher depression
From baseline to 12th week (end of intervention)
Health Related Quality of Life EQ-5D-5L
Time Frame: From baseline to 12th week (end of intervention)
The EQ-5D is a generic instrument for describing and valuing health. It is based on a descriptive system that defines health in terms of 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension has 5 response categories corresponding to no problems, some problems, and extreme problems
From baseline to 12th week (end of intervention)
Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7)
Time Frame: From baseline to 12th week (end of intervention)
GAD-7 is a brief scale to identify probable cases of generalised anxiety and depression, as well as assessing symptom severity. Higher scores shows greator severity of anxiety
From baseline to 12th week (end of intervention)
Social and Occupational Functioning Scale (SOFAS)
Time Frame: From baseline to 12th week (end of intervention)
SOFAS will be used to assess overall functioning in a single score (0-100). It is a global rating of current functioning; this instrument focuses on social and occupational functioning that is independent of the overall severity of the individual's psychological symptoms.
From baseline to 12th week (end of intervention)
Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire
Time Frame: From baseline to 12th week (end of intervention)
a nine-item scale designed to rapidly assess the cognitive and emotional representations of illness
From baseline to 12th week (end of intervention)
Kessler Psychological Distress Scale
Time Frame: From baseline to 12th week (end of intervention)
Level of distress will be assessed using a 10-item scale the "Kessler Psychological Distress Scale
From baseline to 12th week (end of intervention)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ameer B Khoso, PhD, Pakistan Institute of Living and Learning

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 16, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

September 23, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PILL-CBT ARMS-FEP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Individuals at Risk of First Episode Psychosis

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Behavior Therapy for those at risk of first episode psychosis

Subscribe