Digital Strategies to Advance Help-Seeking Aim 1 and 2

April 30, 2026 updated by: Michael Birnbaum, Columbia University

Digital Strategies to Advance Help-Seeking in Youth at Clinical High Risk for Developing Psychosis

This proposal aims to establish a Digital Laboratory focused on advancing help-seeking and expediting treatment initiation in youth ages 12-29 who are at Clinical High-Risk (CHR) for developing psychosis. Leveraging the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA) model, this study will identify help-seeking subtypes in 25,000 youth who screen positive for psychosis-risk on Mental Health America's national online screening platform, iteratively develop and test theory and data-driven, personalized strategies to advance help-seeking using Micro-Randomized Trials and a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial, identify the most accurate CHR screening threshold in an online environment, and link youth, when indicated, to local clinical care via Accelerating Medicines Partnership - Schizophrenia (AMP-SCZ), a NIH funded national network of CHR programs throughout the US. This academic-industry partnership aims to curate one of the largest datasets of youth with CHR, and to develop effective strategies to enhance early help-seeking, in a population where help-seeking is critical and a significant barrier to care.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Aim 1: Characterize help-seeking patterns in 25,000 youth who score above Prodromal-Questionnaire (PQ-B) threshold. H1a: Youth will cluster into (1) pre-intenders (take the PQ-B and engage with educational content), (2) intenders (initiate a text exchange with a Strong365 peer navigator (3) actors (advance from texting to clinical assessment with a Strong365 clinician over phone/video) and (4) super-actors (advance from assessment to AMP-SCZ intake). Data will include online metadata (time spent online, # of resources viewed, time spent to complete the PQ-B, # of texts initiated/exchanged), self-report (demographics, symptom type and severity, PQ-B score, goals/needs, self-efficacy), and natural language. H1b (Strong365 only): Natural Language Processing (NLP) of data extracted from participant/provider interactions over text and video will identify linguistic markers of HAPA stages: intender, actor, super-actor. Models based on HAPA stages, along with behavioral features (i.e., message timing, frequency, response lag) will predict help-seeking advancement vs. disengagement. Top predictive features will be used to inform the crafting of help-seeking advancement strategies to be tested in MRTs (Aim 3).

Aim 2: To ensure that those who complete the PQ-B are directed appropriately, this study will establish the most accurate threshold for identifying CHR online. H2: Using data from population-based PQ-B screening, the investigators predict that a total distress score of 20+ will generate the highest diagnostic odds ratio with a sensitivity of at least 80% online, as determined by remote clinical assessment. For the remainder of the study, the threshold score that maximizes specificity and sensitivity will be used.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

25000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Recruiting
        • Columbia University Irving Medical Center
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Based on current MHA user demographic data, the investigators expect a high percentage of youth from low-income families (over 50% report household income below $40,000/year) who have never been in psychiatric care (65% of those who screen positive report having no mental health diagnosis). MHA visitors who complete the PQ-B are a diverse and representative sample of US youth in terms of racial, ethnic, sexual orientation, and gender identity.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ages 12-29 years
  • Living within a 50-mile radius of a US based AMP-SCZ site
  • Able to complete the English language PQ-B on MHA's screening platform

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Aim 1: Proportion of participants in each help-seeking category
Time Frame: 1 year
Data from participants, including online metadata (time spent online, # of resources viewed, time spent to complete the PQ-B, # of texts initiated/exchanged), self-report (demographics, symptom type and severity, PQ-B score, goals/needs, self-efficacy), and natural language will be used to cluster participants into 4 categories: (1) Pre-intenders (take the PQ-B); (2) Intenders (initiate a text exchange with a peer navigator; (3) Actors (advance to clinical assessment); and (4) Super-actors (advance to intake).
1 year
Aim 2: Threshold score for identifying Clinical High-Risk Youth online
Time Frame: 1 year
This score will be determined using data from population-based PQ-B screening. A total distress score of 20+ is predicted to generate the highest diagnostic odds ratio with a sensitivity of at least 80% online, as determined by remote clinical assessment. For the remainder of the study, a threshold score that maximizes specificity and sensitivity will be used.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael Birnbaum, MD, Columbia University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 7, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 14, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AAAV1315 Aim 1 and 2
  • 1R01MH133569-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Clinical High Risk

Subscribe