Comparison Between the Analgesic Effect of Fascia Transversalis Block vs Caudal Block

April 14, 2026 updated by: AbdElKhalik Mahmoud Shaban, Cairo University

Comparison Between the Analgesic Effect of Fascia Transversalis Block vs Caudal Block in Pediatrics Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Surgeries: Randomized Double-blinded Comparative Study

Despite the growing interest in interfascial blocks and their successful use in pediatric surgeries, no previous randomized clinical trials have directly compared the analgesic efficacy, opioid-sparing effect, and safety profile of the fascia transversalis block versus the caudal block in pediatric patients undergoing unilateral inguinal hernia repair. This study aims to address this gap by providing the first head-to-head randomized comparison between both blocks in a standardized surgical setting

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Kasr Alaini hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA physical status I or II, scheduled for elective unilateral inguinal hernia surgery under general anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Parental refusal.
  • Pre-existing infection at block site.
  • Coagulopathy (defined as INR >1.5, Platelets <100,000).
  • Known allergy to local anesthetics.
  • History of complications from regional anesthesia.
  • Emergency or bilateral hernia repair.
  • Neurodevelopmental disorders (e.g., cerebral palsy, spina bifida).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Fascia Transversalis Block
Patients will receive Fascia Transversalis Block
Patients will receive Fascia Transversalis Block using 0.5 mL/kg of Bupivacaine 0.25% . The commercial preparation that will be used is Bupivacaine HCl (Sunny Pharmaceutical, Egypt)
Active Comparator: caudal block
Patients will receive caudal block
Patients will receive a caudal block with 0.5 mL/kg of Bupivacaine 0.25% injected. The commercial preparation that will be used is Bupivacaine HCl (Sunny Pharmaceutical, Egypt)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to the first request for rescue analgesia
Time Frame: 24 hours post-operatively
the interval between the end of surgery (extubation) and the first need for analgesia (paracetamol)
24 hours post-operatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total intraoperative fentanyl consumption
Time Frame: from the start of general anesthesia until the extubation
from the start of general anesthesia until the extubation
Postoperative FLACC (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) pain scores
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Each of the five behaviors will be scored on a scale of 0 to 2. The scores are then added together to get a total score, which can range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain).
24 hours postoperatively
Total paracetamol dose in 24 hours
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
24 hours postoperatively
Parental satisfaction score
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively

Will be measured using a 5-point Likert scale:

  1. = Extremely dissatisfied
  2. = Unsatisfied
  3. = Neutral
  4. = Satisfied
  5. = Extremely satisfied
24 hours postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 20, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

April 14, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

November 19, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2026

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post Operative Pain, Acute

Clinical Trials on Fascia Transversalis Block

Subscribe