Effectiveness of Digital Health Intervention on Community Health Care in Middle-aged and Older Population in Taiwan

November 18, 2025 updated by: Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Effectiveness of Digital Health Interventions on Community Health Care Among Middle-aged and Elderly Population in Taiwan: 6-month Cluster Randomized Trial

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a digital health intervention for community-dwelling middle-aged and older adults in Taiwan. A total of 199 participants from four randomly selected communities will be enrolled in a 6-month cluster randomized trial. Participants in the intervention group will use smart devices to record physiological data, which are automatically uploaded to a cloud-based health management platform. Physicians will review the data monthly and provide personalized consultations and health education. Primary outcomes include anthropometric measures, biochemical indices, electrocardiograms, and self-reported health and sleep quality.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This 6-month cluster randomized trial is conducted in Guishan District, Taoyuan City, Taiwan, to examine the impact of a digital health intervention on community health outcomes among adults aged 50 years and older.

From 32 eligible communities, four are randomly selected. Participants must have resided in the community for at least six months, be aged 50 years or older, and provide informed consent. Individuals with severe cognitive impairment, terminal illness, or an inability to use basic digital devices are excluded.

Participants in the intervention group will use smart devices to measure blood pressure, fasting glucose, uric acid, total cholesterol, and electrocardiograms. The data are automatically synchronized with a cloud-based health management platform. Physicians will review data monthly and provide individualized consultations and health education sessions at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months.

Primary outcomes include anthropometric indices (BMI, body fat percentage, visceral fat rating, skeletal muscle mass index), biochemical markers (fasting glucose, uric acid, cholesterol), and self-reported health and sleep quality. Secondary outcomes include trends in physiological indicators and associations among cardiometabolic risk factors.

Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (IRB No.: 202201534B0). Written informed consent is obtained from all participants.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

199

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Taoyuan
      • Taoyuan District, Taoyuan, Taiwan, 333
        • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 50 years and older
  • Resided in the community for at least 6 months
  • Able and willing to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe cognitive impairment
  • Terminal illness
  • Inability to operate basic digital devices (e.g., smartphone, health monitoring device)
  • Declined to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention Group (Digital Health Program)
Participants in this arm used smart devices to measure physiological data, including blood pressure, blood glucose, uric acid, cholesterol, and electrocardiograms. The data were automatically uploaded to a cloud-based health management platform. Physicians reviewed the data monthly and provided personalized consultations and health education during the 6-month intervention period.
Participants in the intervention group used smart devices to measure physiological parameters, including blood pressure, blood glucose, uric acid, cholesterol, and electrocardiograms. These data were automatically uploaded to a cloud-based health management platform. Physicians reviewed the data monthly and provided personalized consultations and health education for 6 months.
No Intervention: Control Group - Usual Care
Participants in this arm received usual community health care and did not use smart devices or the digital health management platform. No additional physician consultations or structured health education sessions were provided beyond the standard community health services.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Fasting Blood Glucose
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Measurement: Laboratory glucose value in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL). Range: Typically 50-500 mg/dL observed in human plasma. Directionality: Higher values indicate worse glycemic control. Abnormal thresholds: FPG ≥ 100 mg/dL or PPG ≥ 140 mg/dL (American Diabetes Association criteria).
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Change in Blood Pressure (Systolic and Diastolic)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Measurement: Systolic (mmHg) and diastolic (mmHg). Range: 70-250 mmHg (SBP); 40-150 mmHg (DBP). Directionality: Higher values indicate worse blood-pressure control. Abnormal threshold: SBP ≥ 130 mmHg or DBP ≥ 80 mmHg (2017 ACC/AHA guideline).
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Change in Serum Uric Acid
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Measurement: Serum uric-acid concentration (mg/dL). Range: 2-12 mg/dL. Directionality: Higher values indicate worse metabolic status. Abnormal threshold: > 7.0 mg/dL.
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Change in Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Measurement: Weight (kg) / height² (m²). Range: 10-60 kg/m². Directionality: Higher values indicate greater adiposity. Abnormal threshold: ≥ 24 kg/m² (Taiwanese overweight criterion).
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Body Fat Percentage
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Measurement range: 5-60 %. Directionality: Higher values indicate worse body-composition status. Abnormal threshold: ≥ 25 % (men) or ≥ 30 % (women).
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Change in Visceral Fat Rating
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

Scale range: 1-59 points. Directionality: Higher scores indicate worse (greater) visceral-fat accumulation.

Abnormal threshold: ≥ 10 points.

Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Change in Skeletal Muscle Mass Index (ASMI)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Measurement: Skeletal-muscle mass / height² (kg/m²). Typical range: 4.0-10.0 kg/m². Directionality: Higher values indicate better muscle mass. Cut-offs (AWGS 2019): < 7.0 kg/m² (men) or < 5.7 kg/m² (women) = low muscle mass.
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Change in Self-Rated Health Status
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Scale title: Self-Rated Health Scale (single-item global health question). Scale range: 1 = Excellent, 2 = Good, 3 = Fair, 4 = Poor, 5 = Very Poor. Directionality: Higher scores indicate worse perceived overall health.
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Change in Sleep Quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, PSQI)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

Scale title: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), 19-item standardized questionnaire evaluating sleep over the previous month.

Scale range: 0-21 points. Directionality: Higher scores indicate worse sleep quality. Interpretation: Total score > 5 = poor sleep quality.

Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 1, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

We have not made a final decision on sharing individual participant data (IPD). Data sharing will depend on institutional policies and participant privacy considerations.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Health Promotion

Clinical Trials on Digital Health Program with Smart Devices

Subscribe