Optimization of Post-transplantation Benadamustine and Cyclophosphamide in Patients With High-risk Myeloid Malignancies and a Partially Mismatched Donor (APTBCy)

November 16, 2025 updated by: Ivan S Moiseev, St. Petersburg State Pavlov Medical University

Optimization of Post-transplantation Benadamustine and Cyclophosphamide in Patients With High-risk Myeloid Malignancies and a Partially Mismatched Donor (APTBCy)

Optimization of bendamustine-containg graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis to reduce the incidence of secondary haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis and GVHD

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Prognosis of patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HCT) for high-risk myeloid malignancies, including refractory acute myeloid leukemia, with standard HCT technologies have relatively poor prognosis with 10-30% long-term disease-free survival. One of the approaches to augment graft-versus-leukemia effect the use of post-transplantation bendamustine in graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. Despite high frequency of responses and durable remissions after this approach majority of patients develop a serious complication - cytokine release syndrome, which can be life-threatening in some patients. The combination bendamustine (PTB) and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCY) facilitates comparable graft-versus leukemia effect to PTB, but with better safety profile and reduced incidence of severe cytokine release syndrome.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Ivan S Moiseev, MD, Prof.
  • Phone Number: +78123386201
  • Email: moisiv@mail.ru

Study Locations

      • Saint Petersburg, Russia, 197022
        • Recruiting
        • Pavlov University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with indication for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
  • Patients with <10/10 HLA-matched related or unrelated donor available. The donor and recipient must be identical by the following genetic loci: HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-Cw, HLA-DRB1, and HLA-DQB1.
  • Peripheral blood stem cells or bone marrow as a graft source
  • Diagnosis:

Acute myeloid leukemia Chronic myeloid leukemia, Ph+ Myelodysplastic Syndromes Myeloprolipherative neoplasms - High-risk disease defined as: Acute myeloid leukemia: >5% of clonal blasts in bone marrow despite adequate previous induction therapy or allogeneic stem cell transplantation Myelodysplastic Syndrome: >5% of blasts despite previous therapy Myeloid malignancy with with -7 or complex karyotype, or p53 mutation regardless of blast count in bone marrow Treatment-related myelodysplastic syndrome Second or subsequent allogeneic HCT after relapse of a myeloid malignancy Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia Myeloprolipherative neoplasms, unclassifiable

- No severe concurrent illness

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with indication for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
  • Patients with <10/10 HLA-matched related or unrelated donor available. The donor and recipient must be identical by the following genetic loci: HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-Cw, HLA-DRB1, and HLA-DQB1.
  • Peripheral blood stem cells or bone marrow as a graft source
  • Diagnosis:

Acute myeloid leukemia Chronic myeloid leukemia, Ph+ Myelodysplastic Syndromes Myeloprolipherative neoplasms - High-risk disease defined as: Acute myeloid leukemia: >5% of clonal blasts in bone marrow despite adequate previous induction therapy or allogeneic stem cell transplantation Myelodysplastic Syndrome: >5% of blasts despite previous therapy Myeloid malignancy with with -7 or complex karyotype, or p53 mutation regardless of blast count in bone marrow Treatment-related myelodysplastic syndrome Second or subsequent allogeneic HCT after relapse of a myeloid malignancy Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia Myeloprolipherative neoplasms, unclassifiable

- No severe concurrent illness

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental: Test cohort 1 - ruxolitinib
Days +3 through +4: Bendamustine 50 mg/m2 iv x 2 days; Days +3 through +4: Cyclophosphamide 25 mg/kg iv x 2 days; Days -1 through +21: ruxolitinib 10 mg/kg/day p.o.; mycophenolate mofetil Days +5 through +35 30 mg/kg/day p.o.; Days +5 through +100: Tacrolimus 0.03 mg/kg/day with further correction by concentration
; Days -1 through +21: ruxolitinib 10 mg/kg/day p.o.
Experimental: Test cohort 2 - abatacept
Days +3 through +4: Bendamustine 50 mg/m2 iv x 2 days; Days +3 through +4: Cyclophosphamide 25 mg/kg iv x 2 days; Days -1 through +21: ruxolitinib 10 mg/kg/day p.o.; mycophenolate mofetil Days +5 through +35 30 mg/kg/day p.o.; Days +5 through +100: Tacrolimus 0.03 mg/kg/day with further correction by concentration
Days -1,+5, +14, +21 abatacept 10 mg/kg/day i.v.
Experimental: Experimental: Expansion cohort
Days +3 through +4: Bendamustine 50 mg/m2 iv x 2 days; Days +3 through +4: Cyclophosphamide 25 mg/kg iv x 2 days; Days -1,+5, +14, +21 abatacept 10 mg/kg/day i.v.; Days +5 through +100: Tacrolimus 0.03 mg/kg/day with further correction by concentration
Days -1,+5, +14, +21 abatacept 10 mg/kg/day i.v.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival analysis
Time Frame: 2 years
Measure: Kaplan-Meier estimate of death from all causes
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Non-relapse mortality analysis
Time Frame: 2 years
Cumulative incidence of patients with mortality without hematological relapse of malignancy
2 years
Incidence of secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis
Time Frame: 100 days
Based on H-score diagnostic criteria.
100 days
Incidence of HSCT-associated adverse events (safety and toxicity)
Time Frame: 100 days
Toxicity assessment is based on NCI CTC AE 6.0 grades. Veno-occlusive disease incidence and severity assessment is based on EBMT criteria 2016. Transplant-associated microangiopathy incidence assessment is based on Schoettler et al. criteria. All toxicity measurements will be aggregated as severity scores.
100 days
Infectious complications, including analysis of severe bacterial, fungal and viral infections incidence
Time Frame: 100 days
Proportion of patients, requiring systemic treatment for bacterial, viral and fungal disease
100 days
Incidence of acute GVHD grade II-IV
Time Frame: 180 days
Cumulative incidence of patients with acute GVHD II-IV grade
180 days
Incidence of moderate and severe chronic GVHD
Time Frame: 2 years
Cumulative incidence of patients with moderate and severe chronic GVHD according to MAGIC 2018 criteria
2 years
Relapse rate analysis
Time Frame: 2 years
Cumulative incidence of patients with relapse
2 years
Event-free survival analysis
Time Frame: 2 years
Kaplan-Meier estimate of death or relapse
2 years
GVHD-event-free survival analysis
Time Frame: 2 years
Kaplan-Meier estimate of death, grade III-IV acute GVHD, severe chronic GVHD or relapse
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 10, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 10, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 10, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 16, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Sharing Time Frame

10 years

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Submit a study proposal and request to use the data to Pavlov University Clinical Trial department: spbgmutrials@yandex.ru

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Clinical Trials on Ruxolitinib

Subscribe