Lung Ultrasound-Guided Positioning Strategy for the Prevention of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Neonates (LUS-POSforVAP)

November 25, 2025 updated by: Huiyi Li

Evaluation of Lung Ultrasound-Guided Posture Management for Improving Outcomes in Neonatal Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

This study aims to determine if using lung ultrasound to guide personalized positioning for ventilated newborns is more effective than standard repositioning at preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This research study is testing a new strategy to help prevent Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia(VAP) in newborns who need a breathing machine (mechanical ventilator). VAP is a serious lung infection that can sometimes occur in the hospital.We are using abedside Lung Ultrasound (LUS). This is a safe, painless, and radiation-free imaging tool. It allows doctors to see how well different parts of a baby's lungs are inflated in real-time, much like a "window" into the lungs.Based on the lung ultrasound pictures,our healthcare team will create a personalized positioning plan for the baby (for example, placing them more on their side or on their tummy). The goal is to use gravity to help open up the lungs and drain any fluid, which may lower the risk of infection. We will compare this new method to the standard practice of turning babies every two hours.We believe this personalized,evidence-based care strategy could be more effective in preventing pneumonia. It may potentially help babies get off the breathing machine sooner and reduce their time in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).Lung ultrasound is a well-established and safe bedside procedure.This study has been carefully reviewed and approved by the hospital's Ethics Committee. All procedures will be performed by trained doctors and staff, with the baby's safety and comfort as our top priority.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510317
        • The Second People's Hospital of Guangdong Province affiliated to Jinan University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Eligible participants included term neonates (gestational age 37-42 weeks) who required invasive mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria included ①preterm neonates; ② Neonates with early sepsis or previous pneumonia;③ Not suitable for patients with enteral nutrition;④ Newborns requiring mechanical ventilation due to surgery;⑤ There are many infants with congenital abnormalities or suspected chromosomal abnormalities.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Standard positioning management
NICU routine nursing
Infants in the control group had their positions adjusted every two hours, alternating between supine, left lateral, right lateral, and prone positions.The head of the bed should be elevated 15°-30° with the body in a slightly flexed position-hips aligned along the midline, shoulders slightly forward, head centered, and arms free to move. Position adjustments should only be made when vital signs are stable and resuscitation is delayed, or when adjusting the ventilator, administering IV fluids, or managing deep sleep. If heart rate fluctuates more than 20 beats per minute or SpO₂ drops below 90% (excluding airway obstruction), the interval between position adjustments should be extended to 3-4 hours. This group did not undergo ultrasound evaluation.
Experimental: LUS-Guided Group (Lung Ultrasound-Guided Positioning)
In addition to standard care, LUS assessments were conducted twice daily at fixed time points (08:00 and 18:00) to evaluate regional aeration and guide individualized postural adjustments.
In addition to routine care, two LUS assessments are conducted at fixed times daily (08:00 and 18:00) to guide individualized position adjustments by monitoring regional ventilation.①If unilateral atelectasis or pulmonary edema is detected, the patient should first be maintained in dependent lateral position for approximately 1 hour, then transition to the contralateral or prone position for 3 hours.②For lesions previously managed by the department, the prone position duration is reduced to 1 hour, while supine or lateral positions are extended to 3 hours. ③For posterior lesions, the supine or lateral position should be limited to 1 hour, while the prone position should be extended to 3 hours.④Resume the standard two-hour shift system once the symptoms or edema have subsided.If SpO₂ remains persistently below 90% (excluding operational or feeding disturbances), the respiratory rate increases by more than 20 breaths per minute from baseline, an additional LUS evaluation is required.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia in neonates
Time Frame: From randomization until VAP diagnosis, successful extubation, or death, whichever occurs first, assessed up to 100 days.
Pneumonia that occurs 48 hours after mechanical ventilation (MV) and 48 hours after extubation is an important type of Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), in which pneumonia that occurs within MV≤4 days is early-onset VAP, and pneumonia that occurs within MV ≥5 days is late-onset VAP.
From randomization until VAP diagnosis, successful extubation, or death, whichever occurs first, assessed up to 100 days.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
feeding intolerance in newborns
Time Frame: From the beginning of enteral feeding to the successful establishment of full enteral feeding, discharge or death. The evaluation will last until the end of the study, and the longest evaluation period for each participant is expected to be 100 days.
Incidence of feeding intolerance at any level (mild+severe)
From the beginning of enteral feeding to the successful establishment of full enteral feeding, discharge or death. The evaluation will last until the end of the study, and the longest evaluation period for each participant is expected to be 100 days.
Pulmonary hemorrhage
Time Frame: From the day of random grouping to the event, discharge or death, whichever comes first. The evaluation lasts for the whole invasive mechanical ventilation period and 24 hours after extubation, and the longest evaluation period is expected to be 100 days
Incidence of any grade of pulmonary hemorrhage
From the day of random grouping to the event, discharge or death, whichever comes first. The evaluation lasts for the whole invasive mechanical ventilation period and 24 hours after extubation, and the longest evaluation period is expected to be 100 days
Pneumothorax
Time Frame: From the day of random grouping to the event, discharge or death, whichever comes first. The evaluation lasts for the whole invasive mechanical ventilation period and 48 hours after extubation, and the longest evaluation period is expected to be 100 days
Incidence of pneumothorax
From the day of random grouping to the event, discharge or death, whichever comes first. The evaluation lasts for the whole invasive mechanical ventilation period and 48 hours after extubation, and the longest evaluation period is expected to be 100 days
new intracranial hemorrhage
Time Frame: From the day of random grouping to the end of discharge or study period, whichever comes first. Routine monitoring will last until the seventh day after birth, and the longest evaluation period is expected to be 120 days.
The incidence of any new intracranial hemorrhage (including symptomatic and asymptomatic)
From the day of random grouping to the end of discharge or study period, whichever comes first. Routine monitoring will last until the seventh day after birth, and the longest evaluation period is expected to be 120 days.
Mortality
Time Frame: From the day of random grouping to the end of discharge or study period, whichever comes first. The longest evaluation period is expected to be 120 days.
Mortality during hospitalization
From the day of random grouping to the end of discharge or study period, whichever comes first. The longest evaluation period is expected to be 120 days.
Duration of invasive mechanical ventilation
Time Frame: Time is counted from invasive ventilation to successful extubation or death. The evaluation will last until the end of the study, and the longest evaluation period for each participant is expected to be 100 days.
Duration of ventilator use: from start to successful extubation or death.
Time is counted from invasive ventilation to successful extubation or death. The evaluation will last until the end of the study, and the longest evaluation period for each participant is expected to be 100 days.
NICU hospitalization duration
Time Frame: Time is counted from admission to transfer out of NICU or discharge. The evaluation will last until the end of the study, and the longest evaluation period for each participant is expected to be 120 days.
Time from admission to discharge for hospitalization
Time is counted from admission to transfer out of NICU or discharge. The evaluation will last until the end of the study, and the longest evaluation period for each participant is expected to be 120 days.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 15, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 25, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

November 28, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 28, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 25, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2023-KY-KZ-266-02
  • 2024A03J0771 (Other Identifier: Guangzhou science and technology plan project)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

This study plans to share the collected individual participant data after de-identification.Specifically, it includes: demographic data (gestational age, birth weight, etc.), baseline characteristics, data related to VAP diagnostic criteria, lung ultrasound results, position adjustment records, mechanical ventilation duration, and all primary and secondary endpoint data (feeding intolerance, pulmonary hemorrhage, new intracranial hemorrhage, mortality rate, hospitalization days in NICU, etc.).

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The data will be provided within 6 months after the publication of the main results of this study, and the data will be shared for at least 5 years.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

To provide researchers who provide research proposals with rigorous methodology and clear scientific objectives for achieving the research objectives in the approved proposals. It usually includes meta-analysis of individual participant data, verification of results, or exploration of new scientific hypotheses that conform to the original research ethical framework.The proposal should be submitted to: liangzhenyu0823@163.com (please note: please replace this with the official contact email you wish to use).

To gain access, the applicant needs to sign a data use agreement. The research steering committee of this study will review the scientific value and methodological rigor of the proposal.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pneumonia

Clinical Trials on standard positioning management

Subscribe