Feasibility and Efficacy of rTMS in Depression in Patients With Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) (DEPASS'R)

November 21, 2025 updated by: Hospital Center Guillaume Régnier

Feasibility and Efficacy of rTMS in Depression in Individuals With Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)

Depression is a common complication of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD): it is four times more prevalent in people with ASD than in the general population.

However, treating depression in people with ASD is complicated by the lack of guidelines. Antidepressants appear to be less effective and less well tolerated than in the general population.

rTMS (repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation) is a technique that stimulates the brain in a painless and non-invasive way. This technique is well tolerated and has very few side effects (headaches, fatigue). It is now used routinely in clinical practice to treat resistant depression, with satisfactory results.

A few studies using rTMS in depression in people with ASD have shown encouraging results and avenues for improvement.

It could therefore be interesting to conduct a therapeutic study with rTMS on depression in people with ASD, following the avenues for improvement proposed by previous studies.

The main objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of rTMS in depressed patients with ASD by looking at changes in mood before and after treatment. The investigator will also look at the effects on executive and attentional functions and repetitive behaviors, as well as treatment tolerance.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Depression is a common comorbidity of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Its prevalence is four times higher than in the neurotypical population, with specific symptoms, particularly irritability. However, the management of major depressive episodes (MDEs) in patients with ASD is complicated by the lack of specific recommendations for depression in ASD, while the effectiveness of pharmacological treatments is limited in this context.

rTMS (repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation) is a technique that stimulates brain tissue in a non-invasive and painless manner, with good tolerance and few side effects. In the neurotypical population, it is used routinely in clinical practice to treat resistant EDMs, with satisfactory results.

To date, there are few studies on the treatment of depression in patients with ASD using TMS. Although these studies have certain limitations, they have shown encouraging results. These two studies are open-label studies involving fewer than 20 patients, but they show a significant improvement in depression scales before and after TMS treatment. The stimulation parameters (stimulation target: left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, 15 to 30 sessions at a rate of one session per day, stimulation frequency of 10Hz for the first study and 50Hz in theta burst for the second) are those used in studies on depression in neurotypical depressed patients. In addition to the small sample size, these open-label studies have limitations in terms of parameter potentiation (target localisation, number of pulses per session and per day). It may therefore be worthwhile conducting a preliminary study to assess the feasibility and efficacy of rTMS in depressed ASD patients using an innovative accelerated, high-dose intermittent theta burst stimulation protocol with precise targeting of the stimulation site using neuronavigation and a detailed assessment of clinical depression in ASD, including irritability. Furthermore, an improvement in cognitive functions has been observed in neurotypical depressed patients receiving rTMS at the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. It would therefore be interesting to study the impact of rTMS on executive and attentional functions using these innovative stimulation parameters.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

25

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with a diagnosis of ASD validated by a psychiatrist or line 2
  • Patient aged 18 to 65...
  • Patients suffering from EDM (MADRS greater than 20)
  • No change in treatment in the month prior to inclusion
  • Patients affiliated with or entitled to social security
  • Patients who have received informed information about the study and have signed a consent form to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with psychiatric comorbidity (decompensated manic state, schizophrenic disorder)
  • Pregnancy at the time of inclusion
  • Patients with contraindications to rTMS and MRI (history of epilepsy, neurological stimulator, pacemaker, cardiac defibrillator, cardiac prosthesis, vascular prosthesis, intracranial clips or clamps, cerebrospinal fluid shunt, metal fragments in the eyes, claustrophobia)
  • Adults under legal protection (legal guardianship, curatorship, trusteeship), persons deprived of their liberty, persons hospitalised under compulsion (SDT, SDRE).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ASD patients with depression
Patients receive 4 sessions of 10 minutes per day with a 50-minute interval between each session
Patients receive 20 sessions of intermittent theta burst stimulation of the left CPFDL over 5 days (4 sessions of 10 minutes per day with a 50-minute interval between each session). The CPFDL is located using neuronavigation, which requires an MRI scan (without contrast agent injection) before the sessions.
rTMS (iTBS) treatment with stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Localization is performed using neuronavigation. There are four 10-minute sessions per day, with a 50-minute interval between each session.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in MADRS (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale ) score before versus after treatment.
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the data collecting process : 2 months.

Upon inclusion, patients are assessed for mood using the MADRS.(inclusion criterion: MADRS>20).

The primary endpoint is the change in MADRS score one week after the end of treatment and one month after the end of treatment.

score ranges from 0 to 60. The higher the score, the more severe the disorder is.

From enrollment to the end of the data collecting process : 2 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of changes in irritability before versus after treatment
Time Frame: from enrolment to one month after the end of the rTMS treatment
Irritability is assessed with the Angst scale. A global score of 10 or more indicates irritability.
from enrolment to one month after the end of the rTMS treatment
assessment of changes in attention functions
Time Frame: From enrolment to one week then 1 month after the end of the rTMS treatment

Attentional functions are assessed using two subtests of the TAP (Test of Attentional Performance):

  • sustained attention : The test measures the ability to maintain attention over the long term with a high density of target stimuli.
  • Split Attention : The test explores the Ability to focus attention on two tasks simultaneously.
From enrolment to one week then 1 month after the end of the rTMS treatment
Evolution of any side effects
Time Frame: During the treatment, at each stimulation time
Assessment of side effects of rTMS using the UKU scale
During the treatment, at each stimulation time
Assement of change in repetitive behaviors before versus after treatment
Time Frame: from enrolment and 1 month after the end of rTMS treatment
BPI-1 (Behavior Problems Inventory) is an informant-based behaviour rating instrument that was designed to assess maladaptive behaviours in individuals with ASD. Its items fall into one of three sub-scales: Self-injurious Behavior (14 items), Stereotyped Behavior (24 items), and Aggressive/Destructive Behavior (11 items). Each item is rated on a frequency scale (0 = never to 4 = hourly), and a severity scale (0 = no problem to 3 = severe problem).
from enrolment and 1 month after the end of rTMS treatment
assessment of changes in mood aspects in terms of psychomotor decline before versus after rTMS treatment
Time Frame: from enrolment to one week then one month after the end of the rTMS treatment
psychomotor decline is assessed with the depressive decline scale (ERD).This tool contains 14 items that describe the motor, verbal, ideational, hedonic, and cognitive behavior of depressed individuals. Each item is rated from 0 to 4 ( 1 expressing doubt about the pathological nature of the observed phenomenon).
from enrolment to one week then one month after the end of the rTMS treatment
assessment of changes in mood aspects in terms of depression before versus after rTMS treatment
Time Frame: From enrolment to one week then one month after the end of the rTMS treatment
Depression is assessed with the Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 items (PHQ-9) This is a brief tool used to assess and measure the severity of depression. Items are rated on a scale from 0 to 3. The maximum score is 27 (major depression)
From enrolment to one week then one month after the end of the rTMS treatment
Assessment of changes in executive functions before versus after rTMS treatment
Time Frame: From enrolment and 1 month after the end of rTMS treatment
The TMT (Trial Making Test) measures attention, visual screening ability, and processing speed. The Trail Making Test is scored by how long it takes to complete the test
From enrolment and 1 month after the end of rTMS treatment
Assessment of changes in executive functions before versus after rTMS treatment
Time Frame: From enrolment and 1 month after the end of rTMS treatment
The Stroop test measures recognition reaction times to color stimuli, evaluating psychomotor speed and cognitive flexibility.
From enrolment and 1 month after the end of rTMS treatment
Assessment of changes in executive functions before versus after rTMS treatment
Time Frame: From enrolment and 1 month after the end of rTMS treatment
The GO/NO GO task measures the ability to inhibit and the control of impulses
From enrolment and 1 month after the end of rTMS treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Cécilia NAUCZYCIEL, Doctor, Centre Hospitalier Guillaume Régnier

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 19, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 19, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 19, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 8, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 2, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 2, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Data about study protocol and clinical information will be available on request from other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on rTMS

Subscribe