Phenol Neurolysis Versus Local Anesthetic Plus Steroid Genicular Nerve Block in Knee Osteoarthritis

November 24, 2025 updated by: Salim Sencar

Comparison of Phenol Neurolysis and Local Anesthetic Plus Steroid Genicular Nerve Block Under Ultrasound Guidance in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: Effects on Pain, Function, and Safety

This study aims to evaluate two different ultrasound-guided procedures for patients with knee osteoarthritis (gonarthrosis) who did not benefit from conservative treatments. The first method is genicular nerve neurolysis with phenol, a chemical agent that blocks nerve signals and may reduce pain for a longer period. The second method is a genicular nerve block with local anesthetic (bupivacaine) and corticosteroid (triamcinolone acetonide), which is commonly used to relieve pain and inflammation.

A total of 42 patients are followed prospectively. Pain intensity is measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and functional outcomes are assessed with the WOMAC Index and Oxford Knee Score (OKS). Joint range of motion, need for pain medications, and possible side effects are also monitored.

The results will help to compare the effectiveness and safety of phenol neurolysis and triamcinolone acetonide-local anesthetic nerve block, and may guide future treatment choices for patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Knee osteoarthritis (gonarthrosis) is a major cause of chronic pain and disability. Patients who fail to respond to conservative treatments such as medications, physical therapy, and exercise often require interventional options for pain relief.

This prospective observational cohort study compares two ultrasound-guided procedures targeting the genicular nerves of the knee:

Genicular nerve neurolysis with phenol - phenol induces protein denaturation and Wallerian degeneration in nerve fibers, providing long-term analgesia.

Genicular nerve block with local anesthetic (bupivacaine) and corticosteroid (triamcinolone acetonide) - this combination offers immediate pain reduction from nerve blockade and potential prolonged relief due to the anti-inflammatory action of the steroid.

A total of 42 patients with Kellgren-Lawrence grade 3-4 knee osteoarthritis and moderate-to-severe pain (VAS ≥ 4 for ≥ 3 months) are prospectively followed. Interventions are performed under ultrasound guidance at the superomedial, superolateral, and inferomedial genicular nerves.

The primary outcome is change in pain severity (VAS). Secondary outcomes include functional improvement assessed by the WOMAC Index and Oxford Knee Score (OKS), joint range of motion, need for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and procedure-related adverse events. Assessments are performed at baseline, 2 weeks, and 3 months post-procedure.

The study aims to provide comparative evidence on the effectiveness and safety of phenol neurolysis versus triamcinolone acetonide-local anesthetic block, helping to guide clinical practice in the management of knee osteoarthritis.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

42

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Samsun, Turkey (Türkiye), 55139
        • Ondokuz Mayis University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population consists of adult patients (≥40 years) diagnosed with moderate to severe knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 3-4) who did not benefit from conservative treatments such as medications and physical therapy. A total of 42 patients are enrolled and treated at the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Ondokuz Mayis University, Faculty of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 40 years
  • Diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 3-4) confirmed by radiographic evaluation
  • Moderate to severe knee pain for at least 3 months (VAS ≥ 4)
  • Inadequate response to conservative treatments (e.g., medications, physical therapy, exercise)
  • Ability to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of knee surgery (e.g., total knee arthroplasty) on the affected side
  • Intra-articular injection (hyaluronic acid, corticosteroid, PRP, etc.) within the last 6 months
  • Secondary arthritis (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, gout, septic arthritis, trauma-related arthritis)
  • Severe coagulopathy or current use of anticoagulant therapy contraindicating injection
  • Local skin infection at the injection site
  • Known allergy or contraindication to phenol, bupivacaine, or triamcinolone acetonide
  • Severe uncontrolled systemic disease (e.g., advanced cardiac, hepatic, or renal failure)
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Phenol Neurolysis
Patients in this group receive ultrasound-guided genicular nerve neurolysis. Using a 22G, 50 mm needle under ultrasound guidance, injections are performed at the superomedial, superolateral, and inferomedial genicular nerves. At each site, 2 mL of 6% phenol is injected to achieve chemical neurolysis and long-term pain relief.
Ultrasound-guided genicular nerve neurolysis performed at the superomedial, superolateral, and inferomedial genicular nerves. A 22G, 50 mm insulated needle is placed under ultrasound guidance, and 2 mL of 6% phenol is injected at each target site for chemical neurolysis.
Other Names:
  • Phenol Neurolysis
Local Anesthetic + Triamcinolone Acetonide Block
Patients in this group receive ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block. At the same three target nerves (superomedial, superolateral, inferomedial), 2 mL of a mixture containing 0.25% bupivacaine and 20 mg triamcinolone acetonide is injected at each site. This combination provides nerve blockade with additional anti-inflammatory effect from the corticosteroid.
Ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block performed at the superomedial, superolateral, and inferomedial genicular nerves. At each site, 2 mL of a solution containing 0.25% bupivacaine and 20 mg triamcinolone acetonide is injected using a 22G, 50 mm insulated needle. This provides both local anesthetic and anti-inflammatory effects.
Other Names:
  • Local Anesthetic + Steroid Block

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Pain Intensity Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 3 months after the intervention
Pain severity will be evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS; 0-10 cm), where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. Patients will rate their knee pain at rest and during activity. The main outcome is the change in VAS score from baseline to follow-up assessments.
Baseline, 2 weeks, and 3 months after the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Function and Symptoms Measured by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after the intervention
The WOMAC Index will be used to assess three domains: pain, stiffness, and physical function in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Scores will be calculated according to the standard WOMAC scoring system, with higher scores indicating worse symptoms. The outcome is the change in WOMAC score from baseline to follow-up.
Baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after the intervention
Change in Knee Function Measured by Oxford Knee Score (OKS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after the intervention
he Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is a 12-item patient-reported outcome measure evaluating pain and physical function related to the knee. Scores range from 0 to 48, with higher scores indicating better function. The outcome is the change in OKS from baseline to follow-up.
Baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after the intervention
Change in Knee Range of Motion (ROM)
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after the intervention
Knee joint range of motion, including flexion and extension, will be measured using a goniometer by a blinded assessor. Both active and passive ROM will be recorded. The outcome is the change in degrees of movement compared to baseline.
Baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after the intervention
Change in Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug (NSAID) Consumption
Time Frame: Baseline to 2 weeks, 2 weeks to 3 months, and 3 to 6 months after the intervention
The number of NSAID doses consumed by participants will be recorded throughout the follow-up period. The outcome measure is the total NSAID use and change compared to baseline.
Baseline to 2 weeks, 2 weeks to 3 months, and 3 to 6 months after the intervention
Adverse Events Related to the Intervention
Time Frame: Baseline through 6 months after the intervention
Any adverse events possibly or probably related to the intervention will be recorded, including local complications (infection, bleeding, hematoma, skin changes) or systemic side effects.
Baseline through 6 months after the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bora UZUNER, MD (Medical Doctor), Ondokuz Mayis University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • Study Director: Salim SENCAR, MD (Medical Doctor), Ondokuz Mayis University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 24, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 5, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 5, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared because this is a single-center thesis study with a small number of patients, and data are not intended for public repositories. Only aggregated, anonymized results will be published.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Phenol Injection

Subscribe