Comparative Study Between Two Different Approaches of Brachial Plexus Block: Supraclavicular Approach and Retroclavicular Approach

September 4, 2022 updated by: Mahmoud Adel Mahmoud, Sohag University
In this study investigators will compare two different approaches of brachial plexus block ;supraclavicular approach and retroclavicular approach regarding success rate, duration of block, complications

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Sohag, Egypt
        • Sohag University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 100 patients doing distal arm surgery, elective , 18 to 60 years old , will be included in double blinded randomized study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal .
  • local infection or deformity at the block site.
  • Patient with significant neurological , psychiatric or neuromuscular disease.
  • Pregnancy or lactating women .
  • Coagulopathy .
  • Morbid obesity .
  • History of allergy to local anaesthetics

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Supraclavicular approach group
probe placed firmly over the supraclavicular fossa, parallel to the clavicle to obtain a short-axis view of the divisions of the brachial plexus and the subclavian artery, lying on the first rib After skin infiltration with lidocaine 2% a 23-gauge 70mm block needle inserted in-plane with the ultrasound beam, in a lateral-to-medial direction, until the needle tip's positioned at the junction of the first rib and subclavian artery
group will receive brachial plexus block above clavicle,Injection of anaesthetic will be done in brachial plexus around subclavian artery
Active Comparator: Retroclavicular approach group
the probe will be placed below and perpendicular to the clavicle, in a paramedian sagittal plane, medial to the coracoid process, to obtain a short-axis view of the cords of the brachial plexus and the axillary vessels. The needle will be then inserted in the supraclavicular fossa, approximately 1 cm posteriorly to the clavicle, and advanced in plane and strictly parallel to the ultrasound transducer. After passing the initial blind zone of about 2 cm caused by the acoustic shadow of the clavicle, the needle tip is constantly seen, until it is positioned posterior to the axillary artery
group will receive brachial plexus block inferior to the clavicle,injection of anaesthetic will be done around axillary artery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Block success rate
Time Frame: one year
Investigator will compare success rate of both types of block and which one is more likely to be successfully administrated
one year
Complications
Time Frame: one year
Investigators will compare complications like pneumothorax,nerve injury,bleeding and which one is more likely to cause complications
one year
Duration of sensory and motor blockade
Time Frame: one year
Time which each procedure will take to block sensory and motor stimuli
one year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of procedure
Time Frame: one year
Time which took the investigator to administrate each type of block
one year
Number of needle passes
Time Frame: one year
number of times in which needle has entered been entered into the participant in each group
one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 5, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 5, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

September 5, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 28, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

January 12, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 8, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 4, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Soh-Med-21-11-02

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Brachial Plexus Block

Clinical Trials on supraclavicular brachial plexus block

3
Subscribe