Acetyl-leucine in Post-stroke Ataxia

December 7, 2025 updated by: Mohamed G. zeinhom, MD, Kafrelsheikh University

The Safety and Efficacy of Acetyl-leucine in Post-stroke Ataxia: a Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial

Along with the current clinical trial, the efficacy and safety of 4 gram of acetyl-leucine daily for three months in patients with post-stroke ataxia following posterior-circulation ischaemic stroke assessed through BBS, SARA, and mRS, and possible adverse effects.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

the investigators will conduct our double-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial in Kafr-Elsheikh University in the time between 1st January 2026 to 1st July 2026.

the study will include 200 post-circulation AIS patients who will undergo randomization and divided into two groups; The (A) group, which consisted of 100 patients who administered (a 4 gram of acetyl-leucine per day) and the (B) group, which had 100 patients who administered a placebo during the first 24 hours of stroke onset and for 3 months.

Both groups received (open-label 300 mg loading dose aspirin and 300 mg loading clopidogrel during the first 24 hours of stroke onset, followed by 75 mg clopidogrel and 100 mg aspirin once daily from the 2nd to the 90th day.

The diagnosis of ischemic stroke was established through a detailed clinical history and examination and suitable brain imaging. All of the patients had CT of the brain and CT angiography (CTA) including the aortic arch through the circle of Willis before thrombolysis; the CT of the brain was performed on the 64-slice dual-source spiral CT scanner of Somatom definition by Siemens, and the supratentorial compartment scans were imaged with 5-8mm contiguous sections and the brain stem and cerebellum scans were imaged with 3-5mm slices, and we obtained eighteen images for each series. After thrombolysis, all of the patients underwent an MRI brain on a 1.5 T (Siemens Essenza) MR system, stroke protocol: T1W, T2W, fluid attenuation inversion recovery imaging (FLAIR), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), T2 Echo Gradient, and MRA brain & neck time of flight (TOF) if CTA was contraindicated; the investigators performed an additional brain CT scan after 24-36 hours to evaluate hemorrhagic transformation. (8), and considered hemorrhagic transformation symptomatic if the NIHSS score increased by 4 points or more. (9) The computed tomography (CT)/ magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations were assessed in our study by two highly experienced professionals: a senior stroke physician and a senior radiologist.

the investigators identified posterior-circulation stroke (PCS) when ischemic occlusion affected basilar, posterior cerebral or vertebral arteries

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • the investigators included both males and females, aged between 18 and 80 years, who experienced their first-ever posterior-circulation ischaemic stroke and presented with gait ataxia and score at least 1 point on the items gait, stance, trunk or heel-shin-slide of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) and 47 points or less on the Berg Balance Scale (BBS).
  • All of our patients underwent randomisation during the first 24 hours of the symptoms' onset, and within the first 24 hours from the time at which the patient's condition was last reported to be normal for wake-up stroke patients.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • the investigators excluded patients with modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 5 or more, physical or mental conditions that would not allow safe participation in the study or would influence the assessment of outcomes (e.g., dementia, disturbed conscious level, severe aphasia, etc.).
  • the investigators ruled out participants who suffered from neurological diseases associated with recurrent neurological deficits, such as (epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, head trauma followed by neurological deficit).
  • the investigators excluded participants who underwent intravenous thrombolysis, carotid, cerebrovascular, or coronary revascularization during the first week of the trial to avoid clouding of efficacy and safety analysis.
  • the investigators excluded patients who experienced recurrent ischemic stroke detected from their clinical data and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain findings. In addition, we excluded participants who experienced hypersensitivity to the study treatment
  • the investigators excluded participants who experienced organ failure such as renal failure and liver cell failure, active malignancies, and patients with a known bleeding diathesis or coagulation disorder, a history of intracerebral hemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding within the past 6 months, or major surgery within 30 days before randomisation .

the investigators excluded pregnant and lactating women, patients with cerebral venous thrombosis, and patients with stroke associated with cardiac arrest.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: acetyl-leucine
The acetyl-leucine arm will receive (a 4 gram of acetyl-leucine daily for three months and an open-label loading 300 mg aspirin and 300 mg clopidogrel during the first 24 hours of stroke, followed by a maintenance dose of 100 mg aspirin and 75 mg clopidogrel.
The acetyl-leucine arm will receive (a 4 gram of acetyl-leucine daily for three months and an open-label loading 300 mg aspirin and 300 mg clopidogrel during the first 24 hours of stroke, followed by a maintenance dose of 100 mg aspirin and 75 mg clopidogrel.
Other Names:
  • group A
All patients received an open-label loading 300 mg clopidogrel during the first 24 hours of stroke, followed by a maintenance dose of 75 mg clopidogrel once daily.
All patients received an open-label loading 300 mg aspirin during the first 24 hours of stroke, followed by a maintenance dose of 100 mg aspirin once daily.
Placebo Comparator: placebo
The placebo arm will receive 4 gram placebo daily for three months and an open-label loading 300 mg aspirin and 300 mg clopidogrel during the first 24 hours of stroke, followed by a maintenance dose of 100 mg aspirin and 75 mg clopidogrel.
All patients received an open-label loading 300 mg clopidogrel during the first 24 hours of stroke, followed by a maintenance dose of 75 mg clopidogrel once daily.
All patients received an open-label loading 300 mg aspirin during the first 24 hours of stroke, followed by a maintenance dose of 100 mg aspirin once daily.
The placebo arm will receive (a 4 gram of placebo daily for three months and an open-label loading 300 mg aspirin and 300 mg clopidogrel during the first 24 hours of stroke, followed by a maintenance dose of 100 mg aspirin and 75 mg clopidogrel.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
value of the Berg balance scale (BBS)
Time Frame: 90 days

the primary efficacy endpoint is balance as assessed using the BBS (14). The BBS is considered the gold standard for evaluating balance in people after stroke (20).

a 14-item test that assesses an individual's balance and risk of falling. It measures static and dynamic balance through a series of tasks, with each item scored on a scale of 0 to 4, for a total possible score of 56, with higher score related to more impairment in balance

90 days
the rate of participants who suffered from treatment-related side effects
Time Frame: 90 days
the primary safety endpoint the rate of participants who suffered from treatment-related side effects assessed via questionnaire.
90 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
value of Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA)
Time Frame: 90 days

the first secondary efficacy endpoint is the severity of ataxic symptoms, as determined by the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA)

The SARA is a tool for assessing ataxia. It has eight categories with accumulative score ranging from 0 (no ataxia) to 40 (most severe ataxia).

90 days
value of Modified Rankin Scale(mRS) at three months
Time Frame: 90 days
mRS Measures the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke or other causes of neurological disability; its value ranges from 0 to 6; the lower the score, the better the stroke outcome. A favourable stroke outcome is considered with mRS value equal to two or less.
90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Mohamed G. Zeinhom, MD, neurology department kafr el-sheikh university

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 20, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 24, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 10, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 10, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

All the data that support the findings of this research will be available from the corresponding author M. Zeinhom upon reasonable request.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ischemic Stroke

Clinical Trials on Acetyl-Leucine

Subscribe