- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07281300
Mindfulness-Oriented Respiratory Distress Symptom Intervention for Lung Cancer
April 14, 2026 updated by: The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Mindfulness-Oriented Respiratory Distress Symptom Intervention for Patients With Lung Cancer: A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality, posing a critical public health challenge in both Hong Kong and global populations.
Patients with lung cancer frequently experience a distressing symptom cluster characterized by breathlessness-driven respiratory distress, accompanied by persistent cough and fatigue, which collectively impose a substantial disease burden.
While our research team leader previously developed and validated a multi-component Respiratory Distress Symptom Intervention (RDSI) in England, demonstrating clinical efficacy for lung cancer management, its impact on psychological distress (anxiety and depression) proved limited.
This limitation may reflect insufficient integration of psychological components, a crucial consideration given the well-established bidirectional relationship between respiratory symptoms and psychological distress.
Emerging evidence indicates that mindfulness interventions provide dual therapeutic benefits by improving patient adherence and effectively addressing both physical symptoms, such as breathlessness and fatigue, as well as psychological distress, including anxiety and depression.
Meanwhile, current evaluation methodologies have mainly focused on behavioral data collection, such as self-reported questionnaires, to reflect the effect before and after the intervention.
Neuroimaging data can help understand the brain mechanisms underlying breathlessness and elucidate the effectiveness of interventions, thereby improving intervention strategies.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This study aims to develop and evaluate a mindfulness-oriented respiratory distress symptom intervention (M-RDSI) for patients with lung cancer.
This study uses a two-phase experimental design to develop the M-RDSI and to evaluate the M-RDSI intervention's clinical and neurophysiological effects.
In Phase I, the aim is to develop and content-validate the M-RDSI, including cultural adaptation adjustment and co-design of the M-RDSI intervention, including intervention teaching materials, through an expert panel consisting of patients with lung cancer and healthcare professionals.
In Phase II, sixty-four participants will be randomized into the intervention group, receiving a 6-week M-RDSI intervention in addition to usual care followed by a 12-week follow-up, or the control group, which will receive usual care during the same period.
During Phase IIa, the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary clinical outcomes will be evaluated.
Feasibility will be assessed through recruitment, dropout, and retention rates.
Acceptability will be measured by treatment adherence rates and participant satisfaction, gathered through qualitative interviews.
Preliminary clinical effectiveness will include self-reported outcomes such as breathlessness, cough, fatigue, mindfulness, anxiety, depression, and quality of life.
The generalized estimating equation will be employed to analyze the intervention effects.
Additionally, one-on-one qualitative interviews will be conducted post-intervention to gather participants' feedback on the perceived effectiveness, acceptability, strengths, limitations, and suggestions for improving the M-RDSI program.
In Phase IIb, a task-based fMRI will be conducted at baseline and post-intervention, using a set of breathlessness-related word cues as stimuli to assess changes in brain activity.
Analysis will be corrected for multiple comparisons.
A general linear model will be constructed for the first-level fMRI analysis.
A 2-by-2 factorial ANOVA will assess the group-by-time interaction of brain activity, and a paired t-test will evaluate pre- and post-treatment changes within the intervention group for the group analysis.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
64
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Yan LI
- Phone Number: 2766 6388
- Email: yan-nursing.li@polyu.edu.hk
Study Locations
-
-
-
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
- Recruiting
- The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
-
Contact:
- Yan LI
- Phone Number: 2766 6388
- Email: yan-nursing.li@polyu.edu.hk
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- HK patients who can understand Cantonese, aged 18 years or older;
- A confirmed diagnosis of an intrathoracic malignancy, including small cell lung cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, or mesothelioma; at any stage of cancer treatment or palliative care;
- Self-reported impact on daily life from at least two of the three symptoms, where one symptom is breathlessness;
- Stability of COPD, if present;
- WHO Performance Status of 0-2;
- fMRI can be conducted;
- Expected lifespan of more than six months.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Cognitive impairments, severe psychotic symptoms, or other medical conditions that might hinder participation;
- Participating in mindfulness or other psychological support interventions or symptom management interventions.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Mindfulness-Oriented Respiratory Distress Symptom Intervention (M-RDSI)
Patients in the M-RDSI group will receive a 6-week intervention, including 1) mindfulness training, such as mindful breathing and relaxation; 2) controlled breathing techniques, cough suppression techniques, acupressure, and exercise; and 3) using mindful breathing, relaxation, and attitudes to orientate the practice of RDSI.
|
Patients in the M-RDSI group will receive a 6-week intervention and begin with a training session (ideally face-to-face at the cancer center or the research center or an online meeting as backup for around 60 minutes, including 1) mindfulness training, such as mindful breathing and relaxation; 2) controlled breathing techniques, cough suppression techniques, acupressure, and exercise; and 3) using mindful breathing, relaxation, and attitudes to orientate the practice of RDSI.
A second group training session will be conducted 3 weeks later to review the intervention and discuss any questions participants may have.
The training sessions will be delivered by a well-trained research assistant from experienced clinicians and the research team.
Participants will be guided by the M-RDSI web-based educational materials (e.g., text, pictures, and videos) and a detailed intervention manual for their daily home practice.
|
|
Active Comparator: Usual care
Usual care will receive health educational booklets and routine follow-ups offered by the oncology nurse in the cancer center that patients with lung cancer usually receive during the same 6 weeks.
|
Usual care will receive health educational booklets, including brief tips for symptom management designed by the research team, and routine follow-ups offered by the oncology nurse in the cancer center that patients with lung cancer usually receive.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Recruitment rate
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The recruitment rate will be calculated as the percentage of eligible participants who enroll in the study out of the total number of eligible participants.
|
Baseline
|
|
Retention rate
Time Frame: Immediately after intervention and at 12-weeks follow-up
|
The retention rate will be calculated as the percentage of participants who completed the entire research process (including the follow-up) out of the initial recruitment number.
|
Immediately after intervention and at 12-weeks follow-up
|
|
Drop-out rate
Time Frame: Immediately after intervention and at 12-weeks follow-up
|
The drop-out rate will be calculated as the percentage of participants who voluntarily withdrew from the study out of the initial recruitment number.
|
Immediately after intervention and at 12-weeks follow-up
|
|
Adherence rate
Time Frame: Immediately after intervention
|
The adherence rate will be calculated as the percentage of participants who complete the 6-week intervention.
|
Immediately after intervention
|
|
Participants' satisfaction
Time Frame: At 12-weeks follow-up
|
The participants' satisfaction will be assessed through one-to-one interviews by well-trained PhD students or research assistants.
|
At 12-weeks follow-up
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Breathlessness
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after intervention, and at 12-weeks follow-up
|
This will be measured by the Dyspnoea-12.
Participants will be asked to rate 12 items, with each item scored on a scale from 0 to 3. The total score ranges from 0 to 36, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms of breathlessness.
|
Baseline, immediately after intervention, and at 12-weeks follow-up
|
|
Breathlessness expectation
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after intervention, and at 12-weeks follow-up
|
This will be measured by the Breathlessness word cue set.
Participants will be asked to rate 23 items using two Visual Analogue Scales: one for breathlessness and the other for breathlessness-anxiety.
Each item ranges from 0% to 100%, with higher scores indicating greater levels of breathlessness or breathlessness-anxiety.
|
Baseline, immediately after intervention, and at 12-weeks follow-up
|
|
Cough
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after intervention, and at 12-weeks follow-up
|
This will be measured by the Leicester Cough Questionnaire.
Participants will be asked to rate 19 items, each scored on a scale from 1 to 7. The total score is calculated by converting the item scores, yielding a possible range from 3 to 21, with higher scores indicating less severe cough symptoms.
|
Baseline, immediately after intervention, and at 12-weeks follow-up
|
|
Fatigue
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after intervention, and at 12-weeks follow-up
|
This will be measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue.
Participants will be asked to rate 13 items, each scored on a five-point Likert scale from 0 to 4. The total score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating less severe fatigue symptoms.
|
Baseline, immediately after intervention, and at 12-weeks follow-up
|
|
Mindfulness
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after intervention, and at 12-weeks follow-up
|
This will be measured by the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale.
Participants will be asked to rate 15 items, each scored on a six-point Likert scale from 1 to 6.
The overall score is obtained by averaging the scores of all items, with higher mean scores indicating a greater level of mindfulness.
|
Baseline, immediately after intervention, and at 12-weeks follow-up
|
|
Depression
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after intervention, and at 12-weeks follow-up
|
This will be measured by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale.
Participants will be asked to rate 20 items, each scored on a four-point Likert scale from 0 to 3. The total score ranges from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms.
|
Baseline, immediately after intervention, and at 12-weeks follow-up
|
|
Anxiety
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after intervention, and at 12-weeks follow-up
|
This will be measured by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, which consists of two subscales: the State Anxiety Scale and the Trait Anxiety Scale.
Each subscale contains 20 items, with each item scored on a four-point Likert scale from 1 to 4. The total score for each subscale ranges from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater levels of state or trait anxiety.
|
Baseline, immediately after intervention, and at 12-weeks follow-up
|
|
Quality of life (QoL)
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after intervention, and at 12-weeks follow-up
|
This will be measured by the EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level.
Participants will be asked to rate five domains-mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
Each on a five-level scale ranging from no problems to extreme problems.
Participants will also be asked to provide an overall assessment of their health using a visual analogue scale from 0 to 100, with higher visual analogue scale scores indicating better quality of life.
|
Baseline, immediately after intervention, and at 12-weeks follow-up
|
|
Breathlessness expectation-related brain activity
Time Frame: Baseline and immediately after intervention.
|
A task-based fMRI technology will be used to measure breathlessness expectation using a breathlessness word cue set.
|
Baseline and immediately after intervention.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
August 12, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 30, 2027
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 5, 2025
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 1, 2025
First Posted (Actual)
December 15, 2025
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 17, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 14, 2026
Last Verified
May 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- HSEARS20250424001
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Coughing
-
Taichung Armed Forces General HospitalCompletedFentanyl-induced CoughingTaiwan
-
First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical...UnknownGeneral Anesthesia | Coughing Response | Thyroid SurgeryChina
-
Engelhard Arzneimittel GmbH & Co.KGUnknownSymptoms of Acute Bronchitis Accompanied by CoughingGermany
-
Yonsei UniversityCompletedCoughingKorea, Republic of
-
Yuzuncu Yıl UniversityCompleted
-
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal...Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de MontréalCompleted
-
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal...Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de MontréalCompleted
-
dilara gocmenNot yet recruitingAirway Complication of Anaesthesia | Target Controlled Infusion of Propofol | Sevoflurane Anaesthesia | Laryngospasm on Emergence | Coughing Responses at Tracheal Extubation | Throid Surgery
-
Université de SherbrookeCompletedExtubation | Coughing | Lidocaine | Endotracheal CuffCanada
-
University of Vermont Medical CenterUnknown
Clinical Trials on Mindfulness-Oriented Respiratory Distress Symptom Intervention (M-RDSI)
-
The Christie NHS Foundation TrustCompleted