Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes and Acceptability of an Anatomical Classification for Placenta Accreta Spectrum

January 14, 2026 updated by: Yalda Afshar, MD, PhD, University of California, Los Angeles

Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes and Acceptability of an Anatomical Classification for Placenta Accreta

This study evaluates the clinical implementation of intra-operative topographic classification system for PAS. In addition to a standard of care risk stratification prenatal ultrasound for patients with a risk of PAS, this study adds an additional intraoperative surgical staging protocol to validate the classification system, improve surgical approach, and significantly clinical outcomes of pregnant people with an a prior risk of PAS. The study will involve pregnant patients with PAS risk factor, include data collection spanning prenatal assessment, intraoperative classification, surgical technique implementation and postoperative analysis. The anticipated study duration is approximately 36-48 months.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study is a prospective cohort study designed to assess the validity, feasibility, and clinical utility of a topographic classification system for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS), with a primary focus on its application in the actual execution of surgery. This study is investigating a clinical decision flowchart used for intraoperative staging and classification of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) or similar uterine surgical scenarios. It integrates topographic classification, surgical decision-making, and treatment strategy selection.

The classification system will directly guide and be integrated into real-time surgical planning and management-from cesarean hysterectomy to one-step conservative surgery-based on prenatal ultrasound staging and intraoperative findings.

  • Standardizing prenatal ultrasound staging for PAS.
  • Implementing a structured protocol for intraoperative classification and surgical execution according to ultrasound.
  • Collecting and correlating surgical and pathological findings, including intraoperative photos, videos, and gross and histological analysis.
  • Utilizing an objective method to quantify intraoperative blood loss.
  • Comparing preoperative ultrasound findings with intraoperative and postoperative data to validate the classification system.
  • Managing participant dropouts and protocol deviations to ensure data integrity and minimize bias.
  • Applying appropriate statistical adjustments for multiple group comparisons to reduce the risk of type I error. Methods such as Bonferroni correction or false discovery rate adjustments will be utilized where applicable.
  • Incorporating serial blood draws for plasma and whole blood analysis to identify potential biomarkers associated with PAS severity, surgical complexity, and clinical outcomes. This will be optional and stored in the biorepository.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • Recruiting
        • University of California, Los Angeles
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Yalda Afshar, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This study will be comprised of pregnant people suspected of having PAS. PAS is a major obstetric complication associated with significant maternal morbidity and mortality that is increasing in prevalence due to the rising rate of cesarean births, which are the biggest clinical risk factor

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant people suspected of having PAS based on ultrasound findings or clinical risk factors
  • Patients undergoing planned surgical intervention for PAS, including a planned cesarean
  • Individuals who provide informed consent to participate in the study
  • Patients with at least one prenatal assessment before surgery
  • Expected age range: 18-55
  • Patient has agreed to conservative management approach as part of standard of care if feasible intraoperatively

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who decline participation or withdraw consent
  • Those with contraindications to the planned surgical procedure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
PAS
Patients with placental accreta undergoing planned surgical intervention for PAS
Removal of entire uterus
When partial tissue integrity is preserved
Considered when significant healthy myometrium is preserved

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ultrasound assessment
Time Frame: 0-30 days prior to planned surgery
Prenatal ultrasound assessment using the "Ultrasound Staging" protocol (6 views), with classification into one of the topographic categories
0-30 days prior to planned surgery
Surgical Procedure and Classification
Time Frame: At time of surgery
Intraoperative classification of the placental lesion using the topographic classification system
At time of surgery
Quantification of Blood Loss
Time Frame: Documented throughout surgery and at the completion of the procedure
Objective quantification of blood loss using suction devices, surgical sponges, and vaginal bleeding
Documented throughout surgery and at the completion of the procedure
Gross Pathological Analysis of Resected Tissues
Time Frame: Within 2 hours post surgery
Post-surgery gross pathological analysis of resected tissues to correlate with ultrasound and surgical findings
Within 2 hours post surgery
Adverse Events
Time Frame: Up to 12 months post surgery
Presence of any of the following during follow up will be measured in a binary fashion (Yes/No): re-admissions, re-operations, infection/sepsis, wound seroma.
Up to 12 months post surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yalda Afshar, MD, PhD, University of California, Los Angeles

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 19, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

December 15, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 16, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2026

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Placenta Accreta

Clinical Trials on Total Hysterectomy

Subscribe