- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07292415
Nerve Grafting Using MATRIderm® in Traumatic Digital Nerve Injuries: a Randomized, Single-center, Controlled Study (MATRINERVE)
Hand and wrist injuries are very common, with nearly 2 million cases each year in France. Many injuries involve cuts that damage important structures such as nerves, tendons, blood vessels, bones, or joints. About 12.5% of hand wounds affect nerves, which can cause numbness, pain, or abnormal nerve growths called neuromas. Patients may also experience unusual sensations or intolerance to cold.
The usual treatment for a cut nerve is to carefully stitch it back together. Sometimes, additional techniques can be used to help the nerve heal better and reduce scarring. One technique, called nerve wrapping, involves surrounding the damaged nerve with a small protective tube to support its repair.
This study is testing the use of MatriDerm®, a collagen-elastin matrix originally used to help skin heal. MatriDerm® acts like a scaffold, supporting tissue repair and controlling scar formation. Its properties may also help nerves heal when placed around a stitched nerve.
This is an academic, monocentric, prospective, randomized, controlled study conducted in a double-blind manner (neither the patient nor the evaluator knows which treatment is given). The goal is to see if wrapping a stitched nerve with MatriDerm® improves finger sensation recovery compared with stitching alone. Seventy patients with traumatic nerve injuries of the fingers will be included: one group of patients will receive standard nerve stitching alone and another group will receive nerve stitching plus MatriDerm® wrapping.
Researchers will evaluate finger sensation one year after surgery using standard touch tests. The hypothesis is that nerve wrapping with MatriDerm® will lead to better sensory recovery than stitching alone.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
- Procedure: Standard peripheral nerve repair under regional anesthesia with magnification; epineural sutures placed, followed by 2-week immobilization if needed.
- Procedure: Peripheral nerve repair under regional anesthesia with epineural sutures; nerve wrapped along its length with 1 mm MatriDerm® collagen-elastin matrix before standard skin closure.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Olivier CAMUZARD, Pr
- Phone Number: +33 4 92 03 36 62
- Email: camuzard.o@chu-nice.fr
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Charlotte CIAIS
- Phone Number: +33 4 92 03 93 93
- Email: ciais.c3@chu-nice.fr
Study Locations
-
-
Alpes Maritimes
-
Nice, Alpes Maritimes, France, 06000
- Recruiting
- CHU de Nice
-
Contact:
- Olivier CAMUZARD, Pr
- Phone Number: +33 4 92 03 36 62
- Email: camuzard.o@chu-nice.fr
-
Principal Investigator:
- Olivier CAMUZARD, Pr
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient aged 16 to 75
- Patient with a palm or finger wound with sensory nerve damage (partial >50% or total)
- Indication for repair by direct suture in the operating room
- Possibility of attending a follow-up visit after 1 year
- Patient affiliated with a social security system
- Patient who has given their written consent after receiving written and oral information
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pre-existing sensory disorders
- History of nerve damage in the affected hand
- Known hypersensitivity to bovine proteins
- Active infection in the affected hand
- Patient protected by law under guardianship or curatorship, or unable to participate in a clinical study MATRINERVE 24-PP-12 Version No. 1.0 dated July 22, 2025 Page 8 of 40 clinical trial under Article L. 1121-16 of the French Public Health Code
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women of childbearing age
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Sham Comparator: "Nerve suture alone" group
|
Peripheral nerve repair will be performed in the operating room under axillary regional anesthesia, with a pneumatic tourniquet at 250 mmHg.
The nerve will be exposed using a surgical microscope or magnifying loupes.
The two nerve stumps will be carefully dissected, and epineural sutures will be placed using simple 9/10 stitches.
When tension is present on the repair, postoperative immobilization will be applied for 2 weeks to protect the suture.
Postoperative care and follow-up will be standardized, including regular assessments of sensory recovery and hand function.
|
|
Experimental: "Nerve suturing and sleeving" group
|
Peripheral nerve repair will be performed in the operating room under axillary regional anesthesia with a pneumatic tourniquet at 250 mmHg.
The nerve will be exposed using a surgical microscope or magnifying loupes.
The two nerve stumps will be carefully dissected, and epineural sutures will be placed using simple 9/10 stitches, as in standard care.
In addition, for patients in the MatriDerm® arm, the sutured nerve will be wrapped along the entire dissected length with a 1 mm MatriDerm® collagen-elastin matrix.
The nerve and matrix will then be irrigated with saline before standard skin closure.
Postoperative immobilization will be applied for 2 weeks if tension is present on the repair.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of patients achieving ≤6 mm in 2-point static discrimination test at fingertip pulp 12 months after traumatic digital nerve repair, comparing MatriDerm® nerve wrapping versus standard nerve suturing.
Time Frame: 12 months after surgery (give or take 1 month)
|
The primary outcome is the recovery of tactile discrimination in the fingertip pulp 12 months after surgery.
It is assessed using the static 2-point discrimination test.
The proportion of patients achieving a discrimination distance of ≤6 mm will be compared between the experimental group (nerve suturing plus MatriDerm® wrapping) and the control group (nerve suturing alone).
This measure reflects the functional sensory recovery of the repaired nerve and allows evaluation of the potential benefit of MatriDerm® as an adjunct to standard nerve repair.
|
12 months after surgery (give or take 1 month)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of neuroma formation at 12 months after digital nerve repair
Time Frame: 12 months after surgery (give or take 1 month)
|
The proportion of patients developing neuromas within 12 months after surgery will be compared between the experimental group (nerve suturing plus MatriDerm® wrapping) and the control group (nerve suturing alone).
This measure evaluates whether MatriDerm® reduces the risk of neuroma formation after nerve repair.
|
12 months after surgery (give or take 1 month)
|
|
Incidence of chronic pain at 12 months after digital nerve repair
Time Frame: 12 months after surgery (give or take 1 month)
|
The proportion of patients reporting chronic pain one year after surgery will be compared between the experimental group (nerve suturing plus MatriDerm® wrapping) and the control group (nerve suturing alone).
This measure assesses whether MatriDerm® reduces the occurrence of long-term postoperative pain.
|
12 months after surgery (give or take 1 month)
|
|
Incidence of cold intolerance at 12 months after digital nerve repair
Time Frame: 12 months after surgery (give or take 1 month)
|
The proportion of patients experiencing cold intolerance one year after surgery will be compared between the experimental and control groups.
This measure evaluates the effect of MatriDerm® nerve wrapping on reducing postoperative sensitivity to cold.
|
12 months after surgery (give or take 1 month)
|
|
Patient satisfaction with scar quality at 12 months after surgery
Time Frame: 12 months after surgery (give or take 1 month)
|
Patient-reported satisfaction regarding the appearance and quality of the surgical scar will be collected using a 5-point scale (very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, disappointed, dissatisfied).
Results will be compared between patients in the experimental group (MatriDerm® wrapping) and the control group (suture alone).
|
12 months after surgery (give or take 1 month)
|
|
Overall patient satisfaction at 12 months after surgery
Time Frame: 12 months after surgery (give or take 1 month)
|
Overall satisfaction with the surgical outcome will be assessed using a 5-point scale (very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, disappointed, dissatisfied).
Comparison will be made between the experimental group (MatriDerm® wrapping) and the control group (suture alone) to evaluate the impact of MatriDerm® on overall patient satisfaction.
|
12 months after surgery (give or take 1 month)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 24-PP-12
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on This Study is Testing the Use of MatriDerm
-
Baylor College of MedicineRecruitingThe Aim of This Study is to Measure Blood Flow Before and After a BlockUnited States
-
University Hospital, GasthuisbergCompletedthe Focus of This Study is to Measure the Intra- and Interobserver Agreement for the Evaluation of Early Stage EmbryosBelgium
-
Food and Nutrition Research Institute, PhilippinesPhilippine Council for Health Research & DevelopmentNot yet recruitingAthletes | Nutrition Physiology | The Focus of This Study is to Describe the Body Composition and Metabolism of Athletes and Non-athletes
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, AmiensCompletedThe Main of This Study is to Compare the Nerve Block of the Muscles of the Abdominal Wall Between the Bilateral TAP Block and CurareFrance
-
Hacettepe UniversityCompletedThe Aim of This Study is to Evaluate the Effects of Acute Exercise on Serum Oncostatin M Levels in Healthy, Recreationally Active MalesTurkey (Türkiye)
-
University Hospital, Gentofte, CopenhagenUniversity of CopenhagenUnknownThe Focus of This Study is to Evaluete the Significances of the Vagal Cholinerg Nervuos System for the Effect of GLP-1 by Using Atropin Administration.Denmark
-
University of Colorado, DenverNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingThe Focus of This Study is to Identify How Different Approaches to Mammography Communication Affect Skepticism Toward Mammography EvidenceUnited States
-
Albert Einstein Healthcare NetworkRobert Wood Johnson FoundationCompletedFocus of the Study is on the Use of Incentives to Promote | Healthier Eating in Low-income CommunitiesUnited States
-
Jinnah Sindh Medical UniversityAl Khidmat Hospital Nazimabad Karachi; Medics Laboratories (Pvt.) Ltd.CompletedThe Main Focus of This Study is to Evaluate the Safety of Zingiber Officinale L. Tablets as Hypolipidemic Agent in Hypertensive PatientsPakistan
-
University Hospital, CaenNot yet recruitingthe Aim of This Study is to Describe Genomic Epidemiology of MSSA in Neonatal ICU