Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence Technology in Detecting Periapical Lesions in Human Teeth. (AI)

December 21, 2025 updated by: Mays Maher Albochi, Future University in Egypt

Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence Technology in Detecting Periapical Lesions in Human Teeth. Diagnostic Accuracy Experimental Study.

Aims to evaluate the accuracy of using Artificial intelligence software in detecting the presence of periapical lesion compared to CBCT imaging.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In this research, patients referred to endodontic department in the university will undergo clinical examination (percussion, palpation) tests. These will be recorded. Then the patient will undergo a periapical radiograph to detect the presence of periapical lesion. Patients with periapical lesions will then undergo a cone beam computed tomography and this scan will be uploaded into the Artificial intelligence software to detect the accuracy of the software in detecting the presence of the periapical lesion. Any patient with a periapical lesion in need of root canal treatment will undergo the treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Future University in Egypt

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. All patients must be medically free from any systemic disease that can affect root canal treatment.
  2. 18 to 50 years old patients with permanent teeth presenting with periapical pathosis.
  3. No sex predilection.
  4. All patients must have good oral hygiene.
  5. Restorable teeth
  6. Positive patient's acceptance for participating in the study.
  7. Patients able to sign informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients above 50 years or patients below 18 years.
  2. Patients with very poor oral hygiene.
  3. Pregnant women after taking detailed history and pregnancy test must be in the first visit.
  4. Psychologically disturbed patients.

Teeth that have:

  • Periodontally affected with grade 2 or 3 mobility.
  • Not restorable teeth.
  • Abnormal anatomy and calcified canals

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: cone beam computed tomography
detecting radiolucent periapical lesions using cone beam computed tomography
Cone beam computed tomography scans to detect the presence of periapical lesion by specialized investigators.
Active Comparator: artificial intelligence software
Cone beam CT scan will be uploaded to artificial intelligence software to ensure that the software will detect radiolucent periapical lesion compared to Cone beam CT scans.
artificial intelligence software that aids in diagnosis in dentistry

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CBCT scans
Time Frame: 1 year
Presence of periapical lesion on CBCT scans
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of Artificial intelligence software
Time Frame: 1 year
Comparing results from CBCT scans to Artificial intelligence software in detection of periapcial lesions.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 6, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

December 21, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 21, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 6, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • (52)/11-2024

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Sharing Time Frame

within 1 year from registering the study protocol

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

within 1 year from registering the study protocol

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Periapical Lesion

Clinical Trials on Cone beam computed tomography

Subscribe