InPART RX - Epicenters (InPART RX)

January 20, 2026 updated by: Scott K. Fridkin, Emory University

InPART Rx - Inpatient Provider Antibiotic Rate Benchmarking to Reduce Unnecessary Prescribing

InPART Rx is a collaborative research study to measure the impact of a planned quality improvement initiative to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing by the Hospital Medicine Service through a process of receiving peer-comparison summary prescribing data bimonthly. The initiative is a collaboration between EHC Pharmacy, the School of Medicine (SOM) Division of Infectious Diseases, and the SOM Hospital Medicine Service.

Roughly one-third of antibiotics prescribed in the hospital setting are for the wrong dose, wrong drug, or wrong duration, resulting in considerable unnecessary antibiotic exposure among the inpatient population. Such use increases patient risk for adverse events such as infectious diarrhea or antibiotic-resistant infections. Inpatients cared for by Hospital Medicine providers are a growing proportion of all patients, and developing efficient techniques to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing by these providers would benefit this growing population of patients.

The research team aims to measure the impact of implementing a process to provide peer comparisons of antibiotic prescribing among Hospitalists at four Emory Healthcare (EHC) hospitals back to these providers in an effort to minimize unnecessary antibiotic prescribing. All 147 current Hospital Medicine Service providers will participate as part of the Division's quality improvement effort, receiving no compensation. Only summary patient encounter information without private health insurance (PHI) will be presented back to the providers; investigators will track changes in summary prescribing metrics and summary patient outcomes every month. If such an automated peer-comparison feedback process is effective in safely reducing unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions in EHC, similar processes may be adapted to other inpatient provider groups or serve as a model for other healthcare systems.

The goal of this quality improvement (QI) work is to use traditional QI methods of peer-comparison through data feedback to improve antibiotic prescribing among EHC HMS by reducing unnecessary antibiotic use and improving patient safety on the EHC HMS.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The intervention is messaging to hospitalists via email every 2 months (bi-monthly) that contains peer comparison data of the previous 2 months and antibiotic prescribing educational content.

The details of the content may include a relative rank in prescribing metrics, with blinding to specific peers' identities, and department-wide and facility-specific goals highlighted. Those in the lowest prescribing quartile will earn the designation of "Top Performer". The usual care arm will be an educational email about simple steps to improve antibiotic prescribing sent bimonthly to all hospitalists.

Data Sources: The primary source of data will be the Emory Hospital (EH) Clinical Data Warehouse (CDW), a repository that integrates data from multiple clinical applications within EHC and has the flexibility to create customized, research-specific metrics for all adults (≥18 years old) admitted to the HMS at either Emory University Hospital (EUH), Emory University Hospital Midtown (EUHM), Emory Johns Creek Hospital (EJCH), or Emory St. Joseph's Hospital (ESJH).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

169

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30308
        • Emory Saint Joseph's Hospital
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Emory University Hospital (EUH)
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30308
        • Emory University Hospital Midtown (EUHM)
      • Johns Creek, Georgia, United States, 30097
        • Emory Johns Creek Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All Hospital Medicine Service (HMS) Providers at either Emory University Hospital (EUH), Emory University Hospital Midtown (EUHM), Emory Johns Creek Hospital (EJCH), or Emory St. Joseph's Hospital (ESJH)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: HMS Providers

Hospitalists will receive messages via email every 2 months with comparison data of the previous 2 months and antibiotic prescribing educational content.

HMS providers will be receiving data on prescribing as part of the intervention.

The intervention has two parts: (1) a one-time educational session on antibiotic de-escalation, and (2) bimonthly email feedback reports. Educational sessions, led by facility stewardship leads, focused on evidence-based recommendations for presumed pneumonia and urosepsis, specifically indications for empiric anti-pseudomonal coverage and use of Emory Healthcare's antibiotic prescribing assistance tool. Feedback reports reinforced these indications and provided a link to the tool.
Other: Usual Care Arm (Control)
Hospitalists will receive bimonthly educational emails about simple steps to improve antibiotic prescribing.
The usual care arm will be an educational email about simple steps to improve antibiotic prescribing sent bimonthly to all hospitalists.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Observed provider-specific antibiotic prescribing rate
Time Frame: Baseline and bimonthly for 2 years
The observed provider-specific antibiotic prescribing rate is defined as the billed days of therapy (DOT) of Broad-Spectrum, Hospital-Onset (BS-HO) antibiotics per 1000 billed patient-days.
Baseline and bimonthly for 2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
C. difficile infection
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks post discharge (9 weeks from admission on average)
C. difficile infection occurring during inpatient stay (average 7 days) or within 8 weeks after discharge among patients managed by hospital medicine and discharged with an ICD-10 diagnosis code for community-acquired pneumonia, urinary tract infection (UTI), or urosepsis.
Up to 8 weeks post discharge (9 weeks from admission on average)
Number of participants with a prolonged length of initial hospital stay
Time Frame: Hospital stay, an average of 10 days
Prolonged initial hospital stays, defined as a length of stay exceeding 7 days from arrival at the emergency department (ED) to hospital discharge, among patients managed by hospital medicine and discharged with an International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 diagnosis code for community-acquired pneumonia, urinary tract infection (UTI), or urosepsis.
Hospital stay, an average of 10 days
In-hospital mortality
Time Frame: Hospital admission, an average of 7 days
Rate of in-hospital mortality among patients managed by hospital medicine and discharged with an ICD-10 diagnosis code for community-acquired pneumonia, urinary tract infection (UTI), or urosepsis.
Hospital admission, an average of 7 days
Hospital readmissions
Time Frame: 30 days after hospital discharge
Hospital readmissions up to 30 days after index hospital discharge among patients managed by hospital medicine and discharged with an ICD-10 diagnosis code for community-acquired pneumonia, urinary tract infection (UTI), or urosepsis.
30 days after hospital discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Scott K. Fridkin, MD, Emory University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 20, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 26, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 26, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2025P009466
  • STUDY00003936 (Emory IRB)
  • U54CK000601-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hospital Infection

Clinical Trials on Messaging Hospitalists

Subscribe