Metronidazole 2% Gel Versus Clindamycin 1% Gel for Moderate Acne Vulgaris (METROCLIN)

February 5, 2026 updated by: Rubab Murtaza, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre

Comparison Of The Efficacy Of 2% Metronidazole Gel Versus 1% Clindamycin Gel In The Treatment Of Moderate Acne Vulgaris

Acne vulgaris is a common inflammatory skin disorder. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) will compare the efficacy and safety of 2% metronidazole gel versus 1% clindamycin gel in adults with moderate acne vulgaris at Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre (JPMC), Karachi. Sixty eligible participants (18-35 years) will be enrolled using consecutive sampling and randomized in a 1:1 ratio using blocked randomization. Participants will apply the assigned gel as a thin layer twice daily for 12 weeks. Acne severity will be assessed using the Modified Global Acne Grading System (mGAGS) at baseline and at weeks 4, 8, and 12. The primary outcome is the proportion of participants achieving at least a 50% reduction from baseline in total mGAGS score at week 12. Local adverse effects (e.g., erythema, itching, irritation) will be recorded at each follow-up visit.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

This is an investigator-initiated, parallel-group randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted in the Department of Dermatology, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre (JPMC), Karachi. After approval from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan (CPSP), adults aged 18-35 years with moderate acne vulgaris, defined by a Modified Global Acne Grading System (mGAGS) score of 45-80, and not using other anti-acne therapies will be enrolled using non-probability consecutive sampling. Participants who are pregnant or lactating, have severe acne (mGAGS >80), have a known allergy to metronidazole or clindamycin, or have other dermatologic conditions affecting the face will be excluded.

Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 allocation using blocked randomization to receive either metronidazole 2% gel or clindamycin 1% gel. The assigned treatment will be applied as a thin layer twice daily (morning and night) for 12 weeks after gentle cleansing and drying of the face. Concomitant anti-acne products will be discouraged during the intervention period. Follow-up assessments will occur at weeks 4, 8, and 12. At each visit, acne severity will be assessed using mGAGS, and tolerability will be evaluated by recording local adverse effects, including erythema, itching, dryness, burning, or irritation.

The primary endpoint is treatment response at week 12, defined as a ≥50% reduction in total mGAGS score from baseline. Participants will be classified as responders (≥50% reduction) or non-responders (<50% reduction). Data will be analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26. Categorical outcomes will be compared using the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, and continuous variables will be compared using the independent-samples t test or Mann-Whitney U test according to data distribution. Stratified analyses will explore effect modification by age and sex. A two-sided p value ≤0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria

Adults aged 18-35 years of either sex.

Clinical diagnosis of moderate acne vulgaris, defined as a Modified Global Acne Grading System (mGAGS) score of 45-80.

Not currently using any other anti-acne treatment (topical or systemic).

Exclusion Criteria

Pregnant or lactating women.

Severe acne vulgaris, defined as an mGAGS score >80.

Known hypersensitivity/allergy to metronidazole or clindamycin (or any component of the study gels).

Any other dermatologic condition affecting the face that may interfere with assessment of acne severity or treatment response.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Metronidazole 2% Gel
Participants will apply 2% metronidazole gel as a thin layer twice daily (morning and night) for 12 weeks after gentle cleansing and drying.
Topical metronidazole gel 2% applied as a thin layer to affected areas twice daily (morning and night) for 12 weeks after gentle cleansing and drying.
Active Comparator: Clindamycin 1% Gel
Participants will apply 1% clindamycin gel as a thin layer twice daily (morning and night) for 12 weeks after gentle cleansing and drying.
Topical clindamycin gel 1% applied as a thin layer to affected areas twice daily (morning and night) for 12 weeks after gentle cleansing and drying.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment response by mGAGS at Week 12
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Proportion of participants achieving ≥50% reduction in total Modified Global Acne Grading System (mGAGS) score from baseline (Responder = Yes; Non-responder = No).
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • 20. Verma R, Yadav P, Chudhari M, Patel J, Umrigar D. Comparison of efficacy of two topical drug therapy of acne vulgaris-1% clindamycin versus 5% dapsone: a split-face comparative study. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2022;12(6):817-822.
  • 19. Irshad M, Syed AW, Shah MW, Naeem U, Mirza M, Naeem S. Comparative effects of azithromycin and probiotics for treatment of acne vulgaris. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2023;33(5):516-520.
  • 18. Naveed S, Masood S, Rahman A, Awan S, Tabassum S. Impact of acne on quality of life in young Pakistani adults and its relationship with severity: a multicenter study. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(3):727-732. doi:10.12669/pjms.37.3.2819
  • 17. Dessinioti C, Katsambas A. Antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance in acne: epidemiological trends and clinical practice considerations. Yale J Biol Med. 2022;95(1):53-63.
  • 16. Dréno B, Corvec S, et al. Acne microbiome: From phyla to phylotypes. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2024;38(4):657-664. doi:10.1111/jdv.19540
  • 15. Chen X, et al. Metronidazole: the clinical efficacy and pharmacological effects. Biomedicines. 2023;11(8):2153. doi:10.3390/biomedicines11082153
  • 14. Khodaeiani E, Fouladi RF, Yousefi N, Amirnia M, Babaeinejad S, Shokri J. Efficacy of 2% metronidazole gel in moderate acne vulgaris. Indian J Dermatol. 2012;57(4):279-281. doi:10.4103/0019-5154.97666
  • 13. Nakase K, Aoki S, Sei S, Fukumoto S, Horiuchi Y, Yasuda T, et al. Characterization of acne patients carrying clindamycin-resistant Cutibacterium acnes: a Japanese multicenter study. J Dermatol. 2020;47(8):863-869. doi:10.1111/1346-8138.15397
  • 12. Aoki S, Nakase K, Nakaminami H, Wajima T, Hayashi N, Noguchi N. Transferable multidrug-resistance plasmid carrying a novel macrolide-clindamycin resistance gene, erm(50), in Cutibacterium acnes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020;64(3):e01810-19. doi:10.1128/AAC.01810-19
  • 11. Koyanagi S, Koizumi J, Nakase K, Hayashi N, Horiuchi Y, Watanabe K, et al. Increased frequency of clindamycin-resistant Cutibacterium acnes strains isolated from Japanese patients with acne vulgaris caused by the prevalence of exogenous resistance genes. J Dermatol. 2023;50(6):793-799. doi:10.1111/1346-8138.16757
  • 10. Beig M, et al. Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Cutibacterium acnes isolated from acne patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.lansea.2024.100137
  • 9. American Academy of Dermatology. Guidelines of care for the management of acne vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2023.12.017
  • 8. Khodaeiani E, Fouladi RF, Yousefi N, Amirnia M, Babaeinejad S, Shokri J. Efficacy of 2% metronidazole gel in moderate acne vulgaris. Indian J Dermatol. 2012;57(4):279-81.
  • 7. Verma R, Yadav P, Chudhari M, Patel J, Umrigar D. Comparison of efficacy of two topical drug therapy of acne vulgaris - 1% clindamycin versus 5% dapsone: A split face comparative study. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2022;12(6):817-22
  • 6. Rahim S, Kumar A. The impact of acne vulgaris on quality of life and psychic health in young adolescents of Rehman Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan: a cross-sectional study. J Rehman Med Inst. 2024;8(1):1-5.
  • 5. Babar O, Mobeen A. Prevalence and psychological impact of acne vulgaris in female undergraduate medical students of Rawalpindi and Islamabad, Pakistan. Cureus. 2019;11(10)
  • 4. Irshad M, Syed AW, Shah MW, Naeem U, Mirza M, Naeem S. Comparative effects of azithromycin and probiotics for treatment of acne vulgaris. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2023;33(5):516-20.
  • 3. Rahim S, Kumar A. The impact of acne vulgaris on quality of life and psychic health in young adolescents of Rehman Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan: a cross-sectional study. J Rehman Med Inst. 2024;8(1):1-5
  • 2. Babar O, Mobeen A. Prevalence and psychological impact of acne vulgaris in female undergraduate medical students of Rawalpindi and Islamabad, Pakistan. Cureus. 2019;11(10)
  • 1. Irshad M, Syed AW, Shah MW, Naeem U, Mirza M, Naeem S. Comparative effects of azithromycin and probiotics for treatment of acne vulgaris. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2023;33(5):516-20.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 27, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 6, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared outside the study team. Data will be stored securely at the study site and used only for the purposes described in the protocol. Aggregate, de-identified results will be reported in publications

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acne Vulgaris

Clinical Trials on Metronidazole Topical Gel 2%

Subscribe