Prospective, Non-interventional Study Assessing Periorbital Rejuvenation Procedure

March 20, 2026 updated by: Yuvell

A Prospective, Non-interventional, Single-Centre Study Assessing the Time Course of a Holistic Extended Periorbital Rejuvenation Procedure

The goal of this observation is to assess the time course of holistic extended periorbital rejuvenation using botulinum toxin A, cross-linked hyaluronic acid and polynucleotides corresponding to the application in routine practice in adults. It will also document the safety of treatment procedure and patient satisfaction.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • How does a holistic extended periorbital rejuvenation procedure using botulinum toxin A, cross-linked hyaluronic acid filler, and polynucleotides change skin wrinkling around the eye area over time (particularly after 8 and 22 weeks)?
  • How does the treatment affect the severity of dynamic glabellar lines at 8 and 22 weeks?
  • Does the procedure improve midface volume deficiency after 8 and 22 weeks?
  • How satisfied are participants with the overall rejuvenation treatment?

The investigator will observe the combination treatment of a drug Letybo® and medical devices PhilArt® Eye and Saypha® Volume Plus Lidocaine within their approved indications (non-interventional study, on-label use). The combination treatment aims to rejuvenate and improve the eye area holistically in patients coming routinely to the clinic.

Participants will:

  • take PhilArt® Eye on Week 0 (Baseline), 3 and 6; Saypha® Volume Plus Lidocaine on Week 0 (Baseline); Letybo® on Week 6.
  • visit the clinic on Week 0 (Baseline), 3, 6, 8 and 22 as per clinical practice for checkups and satisfaction assessment.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

29

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Vienna
      • Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 1010
        • YUVELL

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients visiting the clinic for such a treatment as part of routine clinical practice.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. 18 years or older at time of treatment.
  2. At least mild periorbital skin wrinkling, mild frown lines at maximum frown and mild.

    midface volume deficiency as assessed by the investigator

  3. Subject has a stable medical condition with no uncontrolled systemic disease.
  4. Willingness to participate in the routine follow-up after 8 weeks and 22 weeks and a signed informed consent form.
  5. Subject already visiting the clinic for the specific treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnancy and breast feeding.
  2. Neuromuscular disease (e.g. myasthenia gravis, Eaton - Lambert syndrome).
  3. Known impairment of blood coagulation.
  4. Drooping eyelid.
  5. Known allergy to botulinum toxin or human albumin (blood protein).
  6. Presence of acute infection or inflammation at the proposed injection sites.
  7. Botulinum toxin treatment in the glabella within the last 16 weeks.
  8. HA- Filler treatment in the midface or periorbital area within the last 6 months.
  9. Patients with a history of autoimmune disease or who are receiving immune therapy.
  10. History of hypersensitivity to hyaluronic acid, lidocaine hydrochloride or other amidetype local anaesthetics.
  11. History of fish product allergy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Single Observational Cohort
Participants receiving routine clinical care/undergoing the rejuvenation procedure.
Drug is used as part of routine clinical care. This observational study does not assign or modify treatment; it observes outcomes associated with drug use.
Other Names:
  • botulinum toxin A
  • BoNT/A
  • Letibotulinumtoxin A
Device is used as part of routine clinical care. This observational study does not assign or modify treatment; it observes outcomes associated with device use.
Other Names:
  • polynucleotide
Device is used as part of routine clinical care. This observational study does not assign or modify treatment; it observes outcomes associated with device use.
Other Names:
  • hyaluronic acid with lidocaine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in skin wrinkling in periorbital area at Week 8
Time Frame: Week 8
Change in the percentage of skin wrinkling in the periorbital area from baseline to Week 8, as assessed using VISIA® skin analysis. Skin wrinkling is quantified as a percentage-based measurement derived from standardized VISIA imaging of the area around the eye. The outcome is expressed as the percent change relative to baseline, with higher percentages indicating an improvement, which equals a reduction in skin wrinkling.
Week 8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in skin wrinkling in the periorbital area at Week 22
Time Frame: Week 22
Change in the percentage of skin wrinkling in the periorbital area from baseline to Week 22, as assessed using VISIA® skin analysis. Skin wrinkling is quantified as a percentage-based measurement derived from standardized VISIA imaging of the area around the eye. The outcome is expressed as the percent change relative to baseline, with higher percentages indicating an improvement, which equals a reduction in skin wrinkling.
Week 22
Change in severity of dynamic glabellar lines at Week 8 and Week 22
Time Frame: Week 8, Week 22

Change from baseline in everuty of glabellar lines at maximum frowning, measured at Week 8 and Week 22 using using the Facial Wrinkle Score (FWS).

Severity of glabellar lines is quantified by comparing FWS scores at baseline and follow-up visits to assess severity grade during maximum frowning.

The Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS) is a validated photo-numeric scale ranging from 0 to 3, where higher scores indicate greater wrinkle severity.

Week 8, Week 22
Change from baseline in midface volume deficit severity, assessed at Week 8 and Week 22 by the investigator using the Midface Volume Deficit Severity Score (MVDSS)
Time Frame: Week 8, Week 22

Change in investigator-assessed Midface Volume Deficit Severity Score (MVDSS) from baseline to Week 8.

The MVDSS is used to evaluate the degree of midface volume deficiency based on clinical assessment. The outcome is expressed as the change in MVDSS score relative to baseline at each follow-up time point, with lower scores indicating a reduction in midface volume deficit severity.

The Midface Volume Deficit Scale is a validated 5-point rating photo-numeric scale ranging from grade 0 to grade 4, where higher scores indicate greater very severe volume deficit.

Week 8, Week 22
Patient satisfaction with treatment assessed using a clinic-internal patient satisfaction questionnaire
Time Frame: Week 22
Patient satisfaction with the treatment as assessed by participants using the clinic-internal questionnaire titled "Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire". The questionnaire consists of 5 questions evaluating the participant's overall satisfaction with the treatment outcome. Each item is rated on a numeric ordinal scale from 1 to 5, where lower scores indicate higher patient satisfaction.
Week 22

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 2, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 11, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

March 11, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 2, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 10, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 23, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Glabellar Lines

Clinical Trials on Letybo®

Subscribe