Evaluating the Effectiveness of a School-based Stepped Care Treatment Model for Adolescent Depression in Pakistan (SMART-STEP)

This study aims to test the effectiveness of a stepped-care model to reduce depressive symptoms in adolescents in school settings in Pakistan. The study will examine whether the universal intervention, delivered by non-specialists, can reduce depressive symptoms in adolescents after 3 months. For adolescents who do not improve with universal intervention, the study will assess whether a Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT)-based guided self-help app can provide additional support as a second-step intervention. Six hundred adolescents aged 13-15 from 40 schools in Rawalpindi, Pakistan, will take part. The study will determine which interventions work best and for which students to reduce depressive symptoms in school settings in Pakistan.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Introduction:

Depression and anxiety symptoms among adolescents can have long-term negative effects on academic, social, and emotional development if not identified and treated early. School-based interventions, both universal and indicated, are recommended to address these symptoms. However, the optimal timing, dosage, and sequencing of such interventions remain unclear, particularly in low-resource settings. The SMART-STEP study in Pakistan aims to address this gap by evaluating two evidence-informed interventions within a stepped-care model: the universal intervention, delivered by trained non-specialists to provide early support to adolescents in schools, and a Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT)-based guided self-help application, designed for adolescents with persistent symptoms. Both interventions are endorsed by the WHO and UNICEF as part of the Helping Adolescent Thrive Toolkit. This study seeks to answer the question, "What works, for whom, under what conditions, and why, for reducing depressive symptoms in adolescents?"

Methods and Analysis:

The investigators will conduct a clustered Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Controlled Trial (SMART) to evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions, determine optimal timing and dosage, and identify which students benefit most from which intervention.

Study Setting and Participants: Forty eligible public schools in Rawalpindi, Pakistan, stratified by gender, will be included. Following ethical approvals, adolescents aged 13-15 years will be screened for psychological distress using the Paediatric Symptoms Checklist (PSC). Adolescents scoring above the threshold (≥28 on PSC) will be eligible for the trial. 600 adolescents will be recruited.

Stage 1 Randomisation: Schools and participants will be randomized in a 1:1 allocation ratio into intervention and control arms. The universal socioemotional life skills intervention will be delivered by non-specialists to adolescents in classroom settings.

Stage 2 Randomization: Adolescents who are non-responders at 3 months, defined as PHQ-9 scores ≥ 5, will be individually re-randomised to one of two options:

Continue with the initial intervention or augment with the CBT-based guided self-help app Outcomes: The primary outcome is reduction in depressive symptoms at 9-month from baseline. Secondary outcomes include changes in symptoms of anxiety, psychosocial distress, functioning, and perceived psychological well-being.

Ethics and Dissemination:

Ethics approval has been obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the Global Institute of Human Development, Islamabad, Pakistan. Written informed consent will be obtained from parents or primary caregivers, and assent will be obtained from adolescents. Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conferences, and community forums.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

600

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Punjab Province
      • Islamabad, Punjab Province, Pakistan, 46000
        • Global Institute of Human Development

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adolescents aged 13-15 years, currently enrolled in participating schools
  2. Provide assent for participation
  3. Parental/guardian consent provided
  4. Screen positive for psychosocial distress on the youth-reported Pediatric Symptom Checklist (PSC), defined as a total score ≥ 28

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Adolescents who require immediate in-patient (medical and/or psychiatric) care
  2. Adolescents with acute protection risks as assessed by a researcher applying the definitions in the WHO mhGAP intervention guide.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: First Stage Intervention - Universal Intervention for Intervention & TAU for Control Arms

The first-stage intervention involves a universal intervention delivered in the intervention arm, while the control arm receives treatment-as-usual (TAU). In the intervention arm, all adolescents aged 13-15 years receive a structured, school-based program delivered by non-specialists. It is grounded in developmental, behavioural, social, and cognitive theories and aims to provide basic psychological support to adolescents, build their socioemotional life skills, and strengthen collaboration between parents and schools, including referral pathways for those requiring specialist care. Using a structured manual, storybooks, and lesson plans, non-specialists deliver interactive sessions in class.

Mental health services are not available in public schools in Pakistan, so no structured programs will be delivered to adolescents in schools in the control group (TAU).

The first-stage intervention is universal intervention in the intervention arm and TAU in the control arm. In the intervention arm, adolescents receive universal intervention from non-specialists, while in the control arm, they receive TAU. Universal intervention, based on developmental, behavioral, social, and cognitive theories, aims to provide basic psychological support to adolescents, build their socioemotional life skills, and strengthen collaboration between parents and schools, including referral pathways for those requiring specialist care. The second-stage intervention is a CBT-based self-help app. At 3-months, adolescents scoring ≥5 on the PHQ-9 in both arms (indicating the presence of depressive symptoms) are individually re-randomized to continue their initial treatment (universal or TAU) or receive a step-up, CBT-based guided self-help app.
Experimental: Second Stage Intervention - CBT-based self-help app
The second-stage intervention in both arms is a CBT-based self-help app. At 3 months from baseline, adolescents scoring ≥5 on PHQ-9 in both arms are individually re-randomised to continue initial treatments (universal intervention/TAU) or receive a step-up, CBT-based guided self-help app. The app, accessible via tablet/mobile, is based on empirically supported strategies.
The first-stage intervention is universal intervention in the intervention arm and TAU in the control arm. In the intervention arm, adolescents receive universal intervention from non-specialists, while in the control arm, they receive TAU. Universal intervention, based on developmental, behavioral, social, and cognitive theories, aims to provide basic psychological support to adolescents, build their socioemotional life skills, and strengthen collaboration between parents and schools, including referral pathways for those requiring specialist care. The second-stage intervention is a CBT-based self-help app. At 3-months, adolescents scoring ≥5 on the PHQ-9 in both arms (indicating the presence of depressive symptoms) are individually re-randomized to continue their initial treatment (universal or TAU) or receive a step-up, CBT-based guided self-help app.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) for adolescents
Time Frame: Enrollment, 3-months, 6-months and 9-months from baseline
Depressive symptoms will be measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) for adolescents, a 9-item instrument rated on a 4-point Likert scale. The total score ranges from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating greater severity of depressive symptoms (worse outcome) over the past 2 weeks. The PHQ-9 has been previously adapted and validated in Pakistan and has demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.83).
Enrollment, 3-months, 6-months and 9-months from baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Paediatric Symptoms Checklist (PSC)
Time Frame: Enrollment, 3-months, 6-months and 9-months from baseline
The PSC is a 35-item screening scale comprising three subscales: internalizing, externalizing, and attention problems. Items are rated on a 3-point scale, with total scores ranging from 0 to 70. Higher scores indicate greater psychosocial difficulties (worse outcome). The Urdu version of the PSC has been adapted and validated in Pakistan and has demonstrated good reliability and validity.
Enrollment, 3-months, 6-months and 9-months from baseline
Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS)
Time Frame: Enrollment, 6-months and 9-months from baseline
This is a 25-item instrument rated on a 4-point Likert scale, with a total transformed score ranging from 0 to 100, used to measure levels of anxiety and low mood. The instrument comprises two subscales (anxiety and depression). Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity (worse outcome). The measure has been adapted and used successfully in Pakistan.
Enrollment, 6-months and 9-months from baseline
DSM-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure
Time Frame: Enrollment, 6-months and 9-months from baseline
The DSM-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure is a self-rated screening instrument that assesses mental health domains relevant across psychiatric diagnoses. It is used to identify additional areas of inquiry that may have a significant impact on the child's treatment and prognosis. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity (worse outcome) over the past 2 weeks.
Enrollment, 6-months and 9-months from baseline
Checklist of Somatic Symptoms of Distress
Time Frame: Enrollment, 6-months and 9-months from baseline
The Checklist of Somatic Symptoms of Distress is a 10-item instrument rated on a 3-point Likert scale, with total scores ranging from 0 to 20, used to assess somatic symptoms of distress. Higher scores indicate greater somatic symptom severity (worse outcome). The measure has been previously adapted and used in Pakistan.
Enrollment, 6-months and 9-months from baseline
Experience of Bullying
Time Frame: Enrollment, 6-months and 9-months from baseline
Experience of bullying in the past 30 days will be measured using a contextualised version of the Bullying Victimization Questionnaire. The total score ranges from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating greater levels of peer victimisation (worse outcome).
Enrollment, 6-months and 9-months from baseline
School Climate
Time Frame: Enrollment, 6-months and 9-months from baseline
Change in school climate, including students' relationships with teachers, sense of belonging with the school and peers, commitment to school tasks, and participation in school activities, will be measured using an adapted version of the Beyond Blue School Climate Questionnaire (BBSCQ). The questionnaire consists of 28 items, each rated on a 4-point Likert scale, with total scores ranging from 0 to 84. Higher scores indicate a more favourable perception of the school climate (better outcome). The measure will be administered to both adolescents and their caregivers.
Enrollment, 6-months and 9-months from baseline
Annual Academic Performance and Classroom Attendance
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 9-months]
Academic performance and classroom attendance will be assessed using official school records, which have been previously used by the investigators in Pakistan. Annual academic performance will be recorded as percentage scores (0-100), with higher scores indicating better academic performance (better outcome). Classroom attendance will be recorded as the percentage of days attended during the academic year (0-100%), with higher percentages indicating better attendance (better outcome).
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 9-months]
Short Warwick Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWS)
Time Frame: Enrollment, 6-months and 9-months from baseline
The Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWBS) is a 7-item self-report measure assessing mental wellbeing, focusing on positive functioning of thoughts and feelings over the past two weeks. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "none of the time" to "all of the time." Total scores range from 7 to 35, calculated by summing item responses. Higher scores indicate better mental wellbeing (better outcome).
Enrollment, 6-months and 9-months from baseline
Caregivers' Wellbeing
Time Frame: Enrollment, 6-months and 9-months from baseline
The Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ) will be used to assess psychological distress, represented by subscales of physical symptoms and emotional symptoms. Items are scored 0 or 1, where a score of 1 indicates the presence of a symptom of psychological distress. Total scores range from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater psychological distress (worse outcome).
Enrollment, 6-months and 9-months from baseline
Alabama Parenting Questionnaire (APQ)
Time Frame: Enrollment, 6-months and 9-months from baseline
Parenting practices will be assessed using the Positive Involvement subscale of the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire (APQ). This subscale assesses the extent to which parents engage positively with their children, including friendly communication, involvement in planning and conducting activities, awareness of children's free-time activities, playing games together, helping with homework, interest in day-to-day plans, and knowledge of children's friends. Items are rated on a Likert scale, with higher scores indicating greater positive parental involvement (better outcome).
Enrollment, 6-months and 9-months from baseline
PSYCHLOPS (Child's psychosocial well-being and functioning)
Time Frame: Enrollment, 6-months and 9-months from baseline
Child insight into problems and wellbeing will be measured using the self-administered PSYCHLOPS-Kids. The measure assesses three domains: problems, functioning, and wellbeing. PSYCHLOPS-Kids has three versions (pre-therapy, during-therapy, and post-therapy). In this study, the pre-therapy and post-therapy versions will be used as part of the assessment. Domain and total scores are calculated by summing item responses, with higher scores indicating greater problems and poorer wellbeing (worse outcome).
Enrollment, 6-months and 9-months from baseline
Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS)
Time Frame: Enrollment, 6-months and 9-months from baseline
Global functioning will be assessed using a brief clinician-rated measure that rates adolescents on a scale from 1 to 100, categorised into ten functioning bands. Scores range from 1-10 (indicating severe impairment) to 91-100 (indicating superior functioning). Higher scores indicate better global functioning (better outcome).
Enrollment, 6-months and 9-months from baseline
The Social Problem-Solving Inventory - Revised Short Form
Time Frame: Enrollment, 6-months and 9-months from baseline
This is a 25-item instrument rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0-4), used to assess social problem-solving skills, including positive problem orientation, negative problem orientation, rational problem solving, impulsivity-carelessness style, and avoidance style. Total scores are calculated by summing item responses (possible range 0-100). Higher scores indicate better social problem-solving skills (better outcome).
Enrollment, 6-months and 9-months from baseline
Perceived Emotional/Personal Support Scale
Time Frame: Enrollment, 6-months and 9-months from baseline
Perceived emotional support will be assessed using a measure rated on a 4-point Likert scale, with scores ranging from 1 to 4, to assess the level of emotional support perceived by the child across three relationship categories: family members, non-family adults, and friends. Higher scores indicate higher levels of perceived emotional support (better outcome).
Enrollment, 6-months and 9-months from baseline
Client Service Receipt Inventory (CSRI)
Time Frame: Enrollment, and 9-months from baseline
Health service utilisation will be assessed using a structured measure to collect information on outpatient and inpatient healthcare services used by adolescents over a period of up to 9 months, including contacts with all types of healthcare providers. Higher values indicate greater health service utilisation.
Enrollment, and 9-months from baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Syed Usman Hamdani, PhD MBBS, Global Institute of Human Development

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 13, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 10, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • GIHD/Trials/2025/03
  • ISRCTN11220474 (Registry Identifier: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

The availability of individual participant data (IPD) has not been determined at this time.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Psychological Distress

Clinical Trials on Universal Intervention & CBT-based Guided Self-Help Application

Subscribe