Counselling Intervention for College Students Experienced Psychological Distress (TRESPASS)

March 26, 2024 updated by: Alda Troncone, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"

The Role of Mentalization, Emotional Regulation and Loneliness in College Students' Psychological Distress

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate mental health and academic motivation in university students asking help to university counselling service (UCS) in Southern Italy before anf after four weekly psychological sessions.

The main question it aims to answer are:

  • is the psychological counselling intervention useful in improving psychological distress and academic motivation
  • which psychological variables predict the intervention outcome

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The participants will be university students who completed psychological counselling intervention delivered by UCS (University of Campania, Italy). They will be asked to completed an internet-based survey, administered anonymously through Google Forms. The survey consist of two sections. The first section includes questions about sociodemographic characteristics (e.g., gender and age), enrollment year, type of university course attended, academic standing (i.e., whether all exams within the prescribed period had been passed), and previous or current contact with psychological or psychiatric mental health services (university or non-university). The second section comprises four scales that assessed the variables of interest.

To measure psychological distress and problems, the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) will be used. Feelings of loneliness will be assessed using the University of California-Los Angeles Loneliness Scale version 3 (UCLA-LS3). Emotion regulation will be assessed using the Difficulty in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS). Students intentions to continue or to drop out of the academic course will be measured with self-reported questions.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • being university students who asked psychological help to university counselling service and completed the intervention

Exclusion Criteria:

  • do not speak Italian

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Psychological intervention
four weekly psychological counselling intervention
four weekly psychological counselling intervention delivered by university students asking help to university counselling service in Southern Italy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
psychological distress
Time Frame: before and after the treatment, up to 7 weeks
To measure psychological distress and problems, the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) (Barkham et al., 1998; Evans et al., 2000). The CORE-OM is a 34-item self-report measure that evaluates the level of psychological distress will be used. The measure covers four domains: subjective well-being (4 items), problems/symptoms (depression: 4 items, anxiety: 4 items, physical problems: 2 items, trauma: 2 items); life/social functioning (close relationships: 4 items, social relationships: 4 items, general functioning: 4 items), and risk to self and others (6 items). Higher scores indicate higher levels of distress. To distinguish between clinical and non-clinical cut-off values, the four dimensions (scales for both males and females) indicated in the original validation and the Italian version (Evans et al., 2002; Palmieri et al., 2009) will be considered.
before and after the treatment, up to 7 weeks
Academic motivation
Time Frame: before and after the psychological intervention, up to 7 weeks
The Academic Motivation Scale (AMS) is a 20-item self-report questionnaire designed to evaluate the regulation of motivation based on the self-determination theory. Academic motivation is conceptualized according to the degree of autonomy on which the individual behavior is based, expressed through a continuum of increasing self-determination, from not self-determined (amotivation pole) to self-determined (autonomous regulation pole) behavior, from being externally motivated to becoming internally and autonomously driven to perform certain behaviors. The items are rated on a five-point Likert scale (0 = does not correspond at all to 7 = corresponds exactly) and distributed in five subscales--amotivation, external regulation, introjected regulation, identified regulation, and intrinsic motivation. Scores frange from 0 to 140. High score subscale indicates higher endorsement of that motivation type.
before and after the psychological intervention, up to 7 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Emotion regulation ability
Time Frame: before and after the treatment, up to 7 weeks
The Difficulty in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) is a 36-item multi-dimensional self-report measure of emotion dysregulation and emotion self-regulation strategies. The total scores range from 36 to 180, with higher scores indicating more difficulty in the emotion regulation component measured
before and after the treatment, up to 7 weeks
perceived loneliness
Time Frame: before and after the intervention, up to 7 weeks
The University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale version 3 (LS3) is a 20-item self-report measure of an individual's subjective feelings of loneliness. Higher scores indicate greater loneliness. A total score ≥ 47 will be considered indicative of higher-than-normal levels of loneliness.
before and after the intervention, up to 7 weeks
drop-out intention
Time Frame: before and after the intervention, up to 7 weeks
Students' intentions to continue or to drop out of the academic course will be measured with self-reported questions. For the present study, the Italian version, which consists of 4 items asking students how often they have thought about not continuing their university degree courses, will be adopted. Scores frange from 4 to 20. Higher scores indicate a greater intention to drop out.
before and after the intervention, up to 7 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 19, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 27, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 27, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • n. 08, 09/03/2021

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

only, if requested

Study Data/Documents

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Psychological Distress

Clinical Trials on four weekly psychological counselling intervention

3
Subscribe