- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07400198
Gait and Bone Health in SMA
March 16, 2026 updated by: Jacqueline Montes
Identification of Gait-related Digital Biomarkers of Bone Health in Spinal Muscular Atrophy
The objective of this study is to understand how spatiotemporal and kinetic gait parameters are associated with bone health in pwSMA who are receiving DMT.
We hypothesize that gait parameters are associated with BMD and can determine fracture risk in pwSMA.
This is an observational study that involves one in-clinic visit (approximately 3 hours) with remote follow-up visits (approximately 15 minutes) every 3 months for 1 year to collect fracture and medical history.
Each of the assessments included in this study are non-interventional and are not intended as a treatment nor are they at the level of standard of care.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Detailed Description
Addressing bone health is a high priority and remains a concern for the SMA community despite the availability of DMTs.
Fractures often have devastating, irrecoverable impacts on function, especially in ambulatory pwSMA.
While the most recent standards of care for SMA recommend annual screening, supportive treatments are not recommended until there has been a fracture, a reactive approach which may not be enough to mitigate LBM.
Implementing novel, wearable technology and machine learning (ML) models to identify fracture risk will lead to a proactive approach to manage bone health and attenuate the negative sequalae of fractures.
This is an observational cross-sectional study of ambulatory children and adults with SMA.
The aims of this study are to (1) Identify gait-related digital biomarkers of bone health in ambulatory pwSMA, (2) Determine the ability of digital biomarkers to differentiate between pwSMA with and without a history of fractures, and (3) Investigate the ability of risk profiles derived from the digital biomarkers to predict prospective fractures over one year.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Estimated)
22
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Cara Kanner, PT, DPT, EdD
- Phone Number: 516-581-8150
- Email: chy2112@cumc.columbia.edu
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10032
- Recruiting
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center
-
Contact:
- Michael Lutzker
- Phone Number: 9257055133
- Email: ml5121@cumc.columbia.edu
-
Contact:
- Jacqueline Montes
- Phone Number: 212-305-8916
- Email: jm598@cumc.columbia.edu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
The study sample will include 22 ambulatory SMA participants.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Confirmed diagnosis of 5qSMA
- Between 8 and 50 years of age
- Able to walk 10 meters without support or an assistive device
- All participants who meet the inclusion criteria regardless of treatment status will be included, including those on adjuvant therapies, whether investigational or approved
Exclusion Criteria:
- Injury or surgery within previous 3 months that would impact ability to perform in-clinic gait assessments
- Unwilling or unable to comply with all study procedures
- Age less than 8 or over 50 years
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
|---|
|
Spinal Muscular Atrophy
Ambulatory children and adults at least 8 years old by the time of enrollment with genetically confirmed SMA.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Bone mineral density (BMD), a measure of the mineral content in bones is assessed using dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
DXA can be used to identify individuals with low bone mass (LBM).
DXA uses low-power x-ray and is a safe and reliable measure validated to diagnose osteoporosis.
DXA provides a t-score and z-score so that based on age, low bone mass can be appropriately determined.
DXA also provides a subtotal BMD score as well as scores specific to certain body regions, both of which will be utilized in the first aim.
|
Baseline
|
|
Blood collection
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Blood will be collected to assess for routine markers related to bone mineral density.
Blood will be tested for levels of calcium, vitamin D, bone alkaline phosphatase (BALP), and C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTx).
The amount of blood collected will be within hospital rules for children.
The total amount of blood will be approximately 2 mL or 1/2 a teaspoon.
BALP is a bone formation marker while CTx is a bone resorption marker.
Calcium and vitamin D are known to be positively associated with BMD.
|
Baseline
|
|
Fracture history
Time Frame: Baseline, months 3, 6, 9, and 12
|
Details regarding lifetime fracture history will be collected via questioning at the in-clinic visit and during remote follow up visits, every three months for one year.
The participant will be asked to describe each incident separately, including the age at fracture, mechanism of injury (how it happened, its nature, and force), any preceding events like falls or dizziness, and associated symptoms.
Fractures will be characterized by location, type and treatment (surgical or conservative).
|
Baseline, months 3, 6, 9, and 12
|
|
Fall history
Time Frame: Baseline, months 3, 6, 9 and 12
|
Details regarding falls, that occurred within the past year, will be collected using a structured questionnaire at the in-clinic visit and during the one-year follow-up.
Falls will be described by mechanism, environment and outcome.
|
Baseline, months 3, 6, 9 and 12
|
|
Collection of spatiotempoal and kinetic gait parameters using instrumented insoles (AI-Sole)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Stride-by-stride spatiotemporal and kinetic gait parameters will be collected with AI-Sole continuously during the 6MWT.
Spatiotemporal parameters included stride length (SL), stride velocity (SV), percent time in stance phase (%St), and percent time in terminal double support (%DS).
Kinetic parameters included the anteroposterior (AP-COP) and mediolateral (ML-COP) ranges of the center-of-pressure normalized by shoe size, as well as the Absolute COP-Cyclogram Asymmetry Index (|ASI|).
|
Baseline
|
|
Six Minute Walk Test
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Participants will complete the six minute walk test in a corridor which includes the instrumented walkway, while wearing the insoles.
This is to measure spatial parameters, kinetic parameters, temporal parameters, and metrics of cumulative activity in order to compare against the gold standard instrumented walkway.
The six minute walk test is an objective evaluation of functional exercise capacity, and measures the maximum distance a person can walk in six minutes over a 25 meter course.
|
Baseline
|
|
IPAQ-SF
Time Frame: Baseline
|
A quantitative assessment of usual physical activity will be captured using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF).The IPAQ-SF is a commonly used self-administered questionnaire designed to obtain internationally comparable data on health-related physical activity.
The IPAQ-SF is composed of seven questions from four domains of physical activity, including vigorous and moderate physical activity, walking physical activity, and sitting time.
A weighted total from vigorous physical activity, moderate physical activity, and walking physical activity is calculated to produce a total amount of physical activity in MET-min/week.
|
Baseline
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Ten Meter Walk Run (10MWR)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The 10MWR is an objective evaluation of function that measures the speed at which an individual can complete 10 meters.
Gait speed is a commonly used indicator in NMD, and this test can be done by either walking or running.
The 10MWR has been demonstrated to be safe to administer in individuals with SMA.
|
Baseline
|
|
Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The TUG test, a method to assess balance and mobility, measures the time it takes an individual to stand up from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn around, and sit down in the same chair.
In SMA, TUG scores are associated with total leg and knee flexor strength, gross motor function, the 10-meter walk/run, and 6MWT.
TUG test is a sensitive and reliable measure of functional impairment in inherited neuromuscular disorders.
|
Baseline
|
|
30 Second Sit to Stand (30-STS)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The 30-STS test is used to evaluate basic muscle power and function.
The participant is to complete as many sit-to-stands as possible, with or without using their hands for support, in 30 seconds.
|
Baseline
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
SMA EFFORT
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The SMA EFFORT is a perceived physical fatigability patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) that provides a percent (PPF%) total score to each participant based on their participation over the past 30 days.
PPF% total scores are calculated as the sum of activity item ratings divided by the number of items rated multiplied by five (highest rating on Likert scale), with higher scores indicating greater perceived physical fatigability (PPF).Participants are instructed to not endorse any item that has not been performed in the past 30 days, ensuring a PPF% total score that is unique to their current level of function.
In addition to the PPF% total score (across all activities performed), PPF% subscale scores corresponding to the specific activities across 4 different domains of function are similarly derived (Exercise/Recreation, Mobility, Postural Control, and Activities of Daily Living (ADLs).
|
Baseline
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
March 5, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2027
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
December 3, 2025
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 3, 2026
First Posted (Actual)
February 10, 2026
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 18, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 16, 2026
Last Verified
March 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Central Nervous System Diseases
- Nervous System Diseases
- Wounds and Injuries
- Neuromuscular Diseases
- Genetic Diseases, Inborn
- Neurodegenerative Diseases
- Heredodegenerative Disorders, Nervous System
- Spinal Cord Diseases
- Motor Neuron Disease
- Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities
- Fractures, Bone
- Muscular Atrophy, Spinal
- Spinal Muscular Atrophies of Childhood
Other Study ID Numbers
- AAAV3667
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
UNDECIDED
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type 3
-
Institut de Myologie, FranceInstitut RocheCompletedType 2 Spinal Muscular Atrophy | Type 3 Spinal Muscular AtrophyBelgium, France, Germany
-
Marco CapogrossoRoche-GenentechCompletedSpinal Muscular Atrophy Type 3 | Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type 4United States
-
Marco CapogrossoRoche-GenentechActive, not recruitingSpinal Muscular Atrophy | Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type 3 | SMA | Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type II | Spinal Muscular Atrophy 4United States
-
Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.TerminatedSpinal Muscular Atrophy Type 3Italy
-
GeneCradle IncRecruitingSpinal Muscular Atrophy Type 3China
-
The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityThe University of Hong Kong; Manchester Metropolitan UniversityTerminatedSpinal Muscular Atrophy Type 3Hong Kong
-
Istanbul Medipol University HospitalIstanbul UniversityRecruitingNeuromuscular Diseases | Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type 3Turkey
-
Washington University School of MedicineActive, not recruitingSpinal Muscular Atrophy | Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type 3 | Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type IIUnited States, Canada
-
Scholar Rock, Inc.CompletedNeuromuscular Diseases | Neuromuscular Manifestations | Atrophy | Muscular Atrophy | Spinal Muscular Atrophy | Muscular Atrophy, Spinal | Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type 3 | SMA | Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type 2United States, Spain, Italy, Netherlands
-
Scholar Rock, Inc.Active, not recruitingNeuromuscular Diseases | Neuromuscular Manifestations | Atrophy | Muscular Atrophy | Spinal Muscular Atrophy | Muscular Atrophy, Spinal | Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type 3 | SMA | Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type 2 | Anti-myostatinUnited States, Spain, Belgium, Germany, Netherlands, Poland, United Kingdom, Italy, France