Trimodality Bladder Preservation

February 7, 2026 updated by: Mahmoud Esmail Ali Abdelbaki, Al-Azhar University

Outcome of a New Trimodality Bladder Perservation Protocol for Patients With Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

The aim of this study is To evaluate the outcomes of patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer managed by trimodal therapy", Neoadjuvant chemotherapy( NAC) followed by Transurethral resection of the bladder tumor then Radiotherapy, for bladder preservation and capability to reach the goal of better quality of life, compared to radical cystectomy with assessment of factors that may predict treatment response, risk of recurrences and (disease- free and over all)survival of such patients...

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Bladder Cancer (BC) is a worldwide health problem. It is the 7th most commonly diagnosed cancer in male population worldwide, whilst it drops to 11th for both sexes. Approximately 25% of newly diagnosed patients have muscle-invasive disease. Despite potentially curative radical surgery, approximately 50% of muscle invasive cases develop relapse within 2 years, and most of them die. Organ preservation has been the main goal of cancer care in the last two decades, yet it is not generally adopted for the cure of non-metastatic muscle invasive bladder cancer[1].

The standard of care for muscle invasive urothelial-cell carcinoma (UCC) of the bladder is radical cystectomy (RC). Radical surgery results in long-term survival rates of 40%-60% [2-4]. Sophisticated techniques for urinary diversion have been developed to improve patients' quality of life; however, this cannot substitute for the patient's original bladder [5].

Attempts to obtain bladder preservation are only justified when they have a high likelihood of achieving local cure with no compromise in survival rates. Transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT) alone, chemotherapy alone or radiation therapy alone provide inferior outcomes to radical cystectomy with only 20% to 40% local control rates in muscle invasive urothelial-cell carcinoma (UCC). Several groups have reported the value of combining all three modalities, with salvage cystectomy being reserved for patients with incomplete response or local relapse [6,7]. Bladder preservation approaches became increasingly favored, and became successful , essentially after the emergence of concurrent chemo-radiation protocols with cisplatin. The National Bladder Cancer Group first demonstrated the safety and efficacy of cisplatin, as a radiation sensitizer, in patients with MIBC who were unsuitable for cystectomy[8].

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

97

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Asyut, Egypt
        • Azhar Assiut faculty of medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria: clinical case's of muscle invasive bladder cancer .T2 or more bladder cancer according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system.

  • Age >18 years old. .Adequate bone marrow function. .Adequate renal functions. .Adequate hepatic functions.

Exclusion criteria:

.Distant metastases, pelvic lymph node metastasis. .Evidence of tumor-related hydronephrosis. .Severe irritative bladder symptoms.

  • Persistent infection. .Associated serious medical or psychiatric illness. .Prior or concurrent malignancy of any other site unless the patient was disease free for 5 years.

.Previous systemic chemotherapy or pelvic irradiation. .Pregnant or lactating female patients. .Each patient will give written informed consent before entering the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: T2 bladder cancer
T2 patients
Neo adjuvant chemotherapy followed by turbt followed by radiotherapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Clinical ,radiological response , diagnostic cystoscopy and turbt biopsy either before and after neo adjuvant chemotherapy. Assessed response either complete, partial or progressive . according to tumor size,site ,stage, biopsy ( complete or incomplete
Time Frame: 4 years
4 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23485231/

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 11, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

January 25, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 1, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 11, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 11, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Bladder cancer treatment

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bladder Cancer Treatment

Subscribe